Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

2005 Mustang GT: Way to go Chevy (NOT!)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 28, 2003 | 02:21 PM
  #16  
number77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
Originally posted by RiceEating5.0
With the 2006 Cobra rumored at 500hp, i assume there'll be a sub 400hp Mustang be it a GT (maybe an optional High-output S/c engine) or another v8 model (Boss?? Mach-1??).
this also brings up the argument of why the cobra and the GT (gt40) would be so close in hp/tq but to far away in price range
Old May 28, 2003 | 02:25 PM
  #17  
Schismblade's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 563
From: Z
Not every GT is gonna have 400HP. Only the supercharged option will be. Those will be about as rare as Mach 1s. The normal 2005 (Common) GT will be around 300~ HP.

This was discussed about a month ago.
Old May 28, 2003 | 03:59 PM
  #18  
RiceEating5.0's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,313
Originally posted by number77
this also brings up the argument of why the cobra and the GT (gt40) would be so close in hp/tq but to far away in price range
The GT (40) is a 2004 year model, and the upcoming Cobra is a 2006 model. That's 2 year difference. Maybe Ford has plans to up to the GT/40's ouput to 600+hp by 2006.

I really don't know. Nothing's clear right now.
Old May 28, 2003 | 06:51 PM
  #19  
WERM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,873
From: South Jersey
Originally posted by Z28Wilson
Again, I don't think today's Mustang strays from its roots at all. In 1964 the Mustang was an upright, sporty car based on a mid-size platform. Today it is all that plus it brings some performance goods to the table. If anything, the Mustangs that strayed were possibly Mustang II and the early fox-body cars (pretty small and homely IMO compared to all other Stangs.)

Help me I'm actually defending Mustangs!
Actually, the farthest Mustang Strayed from it's roots were the '71-'73 models. BTW, for those that say camaro never strayed from it's roots tell me this - which is closer to the car you could buy in 1967 - A 2002 Mustang or a 2002 Camaro?

BTW, when deciding whether Mustang or Camaro "strayed from it's roots" one has to understand that the cars, while rivals, have - different roots.
Old May 29, 2003 | 08:59 AM
  #20  
cmsmith's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 201
Originally posted by Meccadeth
NOOOOnonononoo.....not what I meant...
I said that the FWD concept (which the virtual public doesn't know aobut) was probably what hurt the Camaro's integrity the most. I didn't mean that it is what killed the fbody by any means...
LOL What?! HOw does something hurt the intergrity the most if "the virtual public doesn't know about" it?
Old May 29, 2003 | 11:19 AM
  #21  
blkformula94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 23
From: Smiths, AL
Originally posted by SNEAKY NEIL
It seems that every other week someone posts "See, the new GT will have 400 HP..............look!" but then it is STILL the same Mustang concept. I am putting my money on a GT with barely over 300 hp.
I agree, they've got 260 now, should be around 280hp
Old May 29, 2003 | 11:57 AM
  #22  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Forget 400hp GT's. I expect GT to have 290-320 hp.
Old May 29, 2003 | 03:54 PM
  #23  
bombd84's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 211
From: College Station, Austin, TX
I guess nobody else read the last paragraph. It says that there will be a base model v-6, a gt and a cobra, and that the cobra is the one that will most likely have the supercharged engine.
Old May 29, 2003 | 04:13 PM
  #24  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally posted by WERM
Actually, the farthest Mustang Strayed from it's roots were the '71-'73 models. BTW, for those that say camaro never strayed from it's roots tell me this - which is closer to the car you could buy in 1967 - A 2002 Mustang or a 2002 Camaro?

BTW, when deciding whether Mustang or Camaro "strayed from it's roots" one has to understand that the cars, while rivals, have - different roots.
The '71-'73 models seemed closer to Gran Torinos in size than the original Mustang.

There is no contest as to which car strayed away from it's roots, it was Camaro. Instead of becoming a stylish car that appealed to all buyers (say what you want about women buying them, the truth still is that more men bought them than f-bodies, and you can buy a 2003 Mustang!)

Once enthusiasts get their fill of a car, it's still going to have to sell to the general population.
Old May 29, 2003 | 04:33 PM
  #25  
RiceEating5.0's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,313
Originally posted by blkformula94
I agree, they've got 260 now, should be around 280hp
I've heard that the upcoming base v6 will be a sub-250hp 3.5 Dohc (called the Cyclone which will be used in other Ford vehicles as well). If that's true, than you can bet that the GT will have more than just 280hp (especially when comparably priced family sedans will have 265hp v6's). I expect nothing less than 300hp.
Old May 29, 2003 | 07:11 PM
  #26  
SNEAKY NEIL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,072
From: Lilburn, GA, USA
I doubt much less than 300 too but I also don't think it will be much higher, if any, than 300 hp.
Old May 29, 2003 | 08:38 PM
  #27  
Meccadeth's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,472
From: South Bend, Indiana
Originally posted by guionM
The '71-'73 models seemed closer to Gran Torinos in size than the original Mustang.

There is no contest as to which car strayed away from it's roots, it was Camaro. Instead of becoming a stylish car that appealed to all buyers (say what you want about women buying them, the truth still is that more men bought them than f-bodies, and you can buy a 2003 Mustang!)

Once enthusiasts get their fill of a car, it's still going to have to sell to the general population.
If no one had seen a Camaro for the past 35 years, and it popped up as a 2002 model looking the way it did, it would appeal to all buyers, the way it did when it first came out...
Old May 29, 2003 | 08:41 PM
  #28  
Meccadeth's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,472
From: South Bend, Indiana
Originally posted by cmsmith
LOL What?! HOw does something hurt the intergrity the most if "the virtual public doesn't know about" it?
Exactly...it didn't hurt it THAT much since the general population of car buyers don't know about it. Thats one of the only 2 or 3 scars I can see on the Camaros past...like I said before...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
1
Apr 8, 2015 06:08 PM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
0
Jan 11, 2015 03:47 PM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
2
Dec 7, 2014 06:01 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Dec 3, 2014 12:30 PM
formula79
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
18
Jul 1, 2002 02:39 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 PM.