Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

2.4L n/a Cobalt SS Pics and Review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 01:33 PM
  #16  
falchulk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,881
Re: 2.4L n/a Cobalt SS Pics and Review

While it has the coupe's looks, its still slow. Its more then a base for not much more performance. It makes the ricers think that they just beat the real ss when they thrash this t hing all day long.
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 03:12 PM
  #17  
maksik7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 272
From: North NJ
Re: 2.4L n/a Cobalt SS Pics and Review

Originally Posted by falchulk
While it has the coupe's looks, its still slow. Its more then a base for not much more performance. It makes the ricers think that they just beat the real ss when they thrash this t hing all day long.
That is exactly the appeal. It looks like the S/C SS but for much less money. As we all know, most of today's youth value looks over performance. A kid can buy this car and everybody will think it's a lot faster then it is. The kid will be happy, and GM will be happy. Everybody wins. It seems to me that only the old-timers have a problem with how the car is named. Guess what? You're not going to be buying them, and the younger crowd really doesn't care that there are 2 SS models. I predict that they will sell great.
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 03:17 PM
  #18  
dream '94 Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,646
From: Portland, OR
Re: 2.4L n/a Cobalt SS Pics and Review

Originally Posted by maksik7
That is exactly the appeal. It looks like the S/C SS but for much less money. As we all know, most of today's youth value looks over performance. A kid can buy this car and everybody will think it's a lot faster then it is. The kid will be happy, and GM will be happy. Everybody wins. It seems to me that only the old-timers have a problem with how the car is named. Guess what? You're not going to be buying them, and the younger crowd really doesn't care that there are 2 SS models. I predict that they will sell great.
I don't know if you'd call me an 'oldtimer' at 33.

I understand your point or view, and it definately has merit. My opinion is that the 'SS' badge should be exclusive to the top performer to keep its respect and street credibility.

I'd be afraid if you start slapping it on the 'one less' model it'll become a watered down marketing gimick.
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 03:20 PM
  #19  
falchulk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,881
Re: 2.4L n/a Cobalt SS Pics and Review

Originally Posted by dream '94 Z28
I don't know if you'd call me an 'oldtimer' at 33.

I understand your point or view, and it definately has merit. My opinion is that the 'SS' badge should be exclusive to the top performer to keep its respect and street credibility.

I'd be afraid if you start slapping it on the 'one less' model it'll become a watered down marketing gimick.

Excactly. Whats so Super Sporty about this car anyway??
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 03:37 PM
  #20  
orbitalshock2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 220
Re: 2.4L n/a Cobalt SS Pics and Review

Originally Posted by maksik7
I think naming this coupe SS was a good idea. Who cares that SS stood for V8 musclecars in the 60's, that time is long gone and the automotive landscape is not the same. However, the SS moniker is still recognized by the public today and GM is right to capitalize on that. It will help drive sales of the Cobalt more then RS or LS Sport would. As a person in the target audience for this car, I can tell you that just that SS badge puts the car in a more performance oriented light for me. And I guarantee you that people my age (18-25) would agree.

In the end its a affordable, sharp looking coupe with decent performance. What's not to like. I think the SS will be a great competitor to the tC and the base RSX which seem to be the image leaders in this price segment.

BTW Why is the N/A SS not on the Chevy website or GMBuyPower yet? I though they were in dealerships already? I wanted to price one out against the tC and the RSX, but no luck.
The first Cobalt SS was underrated from what I heard, and ran .5-.7 faster than the RSX-S in the 1/4

I think the SS name has lost value though. I grew up with the Impala and Camaro SS in the 90s and they were both very respectable. The old timers will remember the Chevelles and Camaros that dawned the SS badge and don't think much of the new ones.
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 04:03 PM
  #21  
maksik7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 272
From: North NJ
Re: 2.4L n/a Cobalt SS Pics and Review

Originally Posted by dream '94 Z28
I don't know if you'd call me an 'oldtimer' at 33.

I understand your point or view, and it definately has merit. My opinion is that the 'SS' badge should be exclusive to the top performer to keep its respect and street credibility.

I'd be afraid if you start slapping it on the 'one less' model it'll become a watered down marketing gimick.
I wouldn't call you an old timer, but you are also not part of the demographic that buys these sport compacts, you probably don't socialize with too many of these kids, and thus have an outsider's look at the whole scene. These kids go crazy for shiny badges and names: Type S, si, Type R. Shiny wheels plus a recognizable name spells cool to them, and I for one am glad that Chevy finally caught on to this trend.

I would be upset if they named it Cobalt Z06 because that would indeed water down the name. But the SS is not the ultimate performance model, it's a step up above the norm. (You can probably guess I'm in the Z/28 camp) The name is already watered down, and if what I heard is true, then the next gen Aveo SS would ruin the name much more then a Cobalt.
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 04:21 PM
  #22  
dream '94 Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,646
From: Portland, OR
Re: 2.4L n/a Cobalt SS Pics and Review

Originally Posted by maksik7
I wouldn't call you an old timer, but you are also not part of the demographic that buys these sport compacts, you probably don't socialize with too many of these kids, and thus have an outsider's look at the whole scene. These kids go crazy for shiny badges and names: Type S, si, Type R. Shiny wheels plus a recognizable name spells cool to them, and I for one am glad that Chevy finally caught on to this trend.

I would be upset if they named it Cobalt Z06 because that would indeed water down the name. But the SS is not the ultimate performance model, it's a step up above the norm. (You can probably guess I'm in the Z/28 camp) The name is already watered down, and if what I heard is true, then the next gen Aveo SS would ruin the name much more then a Cobalt.
I see and understand where you're coming from, even tho you're right, I really don't hang with that crowd.

I've no problem with what they want; except with this analogy, to me this is like Civics with 'Type-R' stickers on them.

I would nessesarily consider an Aveo SS watering down the 'SS' marque as long as it's the best performing Aveo in the lineup.

If I was to put an '*' next to my opinion, does the non-s/c 'SS' come with a performance suspension that, if not the same as the s/c car, is sportier than an LS or LT? If that's the case, then I'd say you could call this 'SS', because it has a bigger engine than the LS and LT cars and sportier dynamics.

This would be just like getting a 350 or 396 in a SS/RS or SS/Z28. As long as it's just not 'badge slapping'.
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 04:51 PM
  #23  
turbo96z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,255
From: new jersey
Re: 2.4L n/a Cobalt SS Pics and Review

if i'm not mistaken, i think both of the SS cobalts are the same except for the motor. i know for sure they are n/a SS is definetley one step above the LS. the car feels like the s/c SS without the umph, like driving a 350 and a 396 SS camaro back to back.
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 05:29 PM
  #24  
maksik7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 272
From: North NJ
Re: 2.4L n/a Cobalt SS Pics and Review

Originally Posted by dream '94 Z28
If I was to put an '*' next to my opinion, does the non-s/c 'SS' come with a performance suspension that, if not the same as the s/c car, is sportier than an LS or LT? If that's the case, then I'd say you could call this 'SS', because it has a bigger engine than the LS and LT cars and sportier dynamics.

This would be just like getting a 350 or 396 in a SS/RS or SS/Z28. As long as it's just not 'badge slapping'.
The N/A SS comes with a "Performance Tuned Supsension" as opposed to the regular "Comfort Tuned" on base and LS. I am not sure if this is the same suspension tuning as on the supercharged, but the description is the same. However I don't think the regular SS gets the upgraded brakes of the S/C.
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 07:38 PM
  #25  
305fan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,308
From: Calgary
Re: 2.4L n/a Cobalt SS Pics and Review

Originally Posted by maksik7
The N/A SS comes with a "Performance Tuned Supsension" as opposed to the regular "Comfort Tuned" on base and LS. I am not sure if this is the same suspension tuning as on the supercharged, but the description is the same. However I don't think the regular SS gets the upgraded brakes of the S/C.
The suspension in the 2.4L SS is not the same as the S/C SS.

Rest assured it is far above the base suspension and LS/LT.

Car had a nice ride but still was firm enough for mosr but the die hards. Probably a good trade off over thte S/C SS---provides more comfort at a slight cost of ultimate grip.

The brakes are shared between both SS cars.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fastbird93
Parts For Sale
24
Apr 9, 2016 07:01 PM
filbielansk
Parts For Sale
4
Apr 21, 2015 08:59 AM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
0
Dec 28, 2014 02:25 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Nov 25, 2014 11:20 AM
T/A lt1
Drag Racing Technique
0
Sep 5, 2002 06:53 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 AM.