1st pics of......The Ford Interceptor.
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,597
From: Mack and Bewick
Having seen the front I kind of like it, which is more than I said about the 300 the first time I saw it.
We'll see if they build anything that resembles it.
This is the 427 if anyone missed it.
I can see the resemblance, but the Interceptor seems a much better effort, the 427 seems almost as bland as the 500.
We'll see if they build anything that resembles it.
This is the 427 if anyone missed it.
I can see the resemblance, but the Interceptor seems a much better effort, the 427 seems almost as bland as the 500.
Last edited by Good Ph.D; Jan 1, 2007 at 02:28 AM.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,748
From: New England
to me that looks nothing like the 300 or the Charger now..after seeing it for a while.
Its the same market sure. If its a rip then its like saying the Mustang and the Camaro are the same..sure they are..same market, same type of car. Its like Caddy and Linc. not having two lixury cars, Town car and DTS..both the same market..
I think Ford needs to put this car into production. get the face ready for it and you got a hit.
Its the same market sure. If its a rip then its like saying the Mustang and the Camaro are the same..sure they are..same market, same type of car. Its like Caddy and Linc. not having two lixury cars, Town car and DTS..both the same market..
I think Ford needs to put this car into production. get the face ready for it and you got a hit.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,224
From: CNY
I think it looks great overall. A step in the right direction for Ford.
The profile is awesome. The front & rear ends need to be re-worked. They are too boxy.
The hoodline needs to be dropped to the lower line as it progresses to the nose and with a little more inward taper. Then, put the more current Ford nose on it.
The rear end needs more taper and then the tail needs to be totally redone.
I can see the 300 in this car.
The profile is awesome. The front & rear ends need to be re-worked. They are too boxy.
The hoodline needs to be dropped to the lower line as it progresses to the nose and with a little more inward taper. Then, put the more current Ford nose on it.
The rear end needs more taper and then the tail needs to be totally redone.
I can see the 300 in this car.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,688
From: Middle of Kansas
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
I think it looks great overall. A step in the right direction for Ford.
The profile is awesome. The front & rear ends need to be re-worked. They are too boxy.
The hoodline needs to be dropped to the lower line as it progresses to the nose and with a little more inward taper. Then, put the more current Ford nose on it.
The rear end needs more taper and then the tail needs to be totally redone.
I can see the 300 in this car.
The profile is awesome. The front & rear ends need to be re-worked. They are too boxy.
The hoodline needs to be dropped to the lower line as it progresses to the nose and with a little more inward taper. Then, put the more current Ford nose on it.
The rear end needs more taper and then the tail needs to be totally redone.
I can see the 300 in this car.
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,502
I think once it has been de-conceptified it would be a very attractive production car.
But I'm more interested in that junkyard with the Fox Theater sign -- is that a set, or is that stuff lying around somewhere in Detriot?
But I'm more interested in that junkyard with the Fox Theater sign -- is that a set, or is that stuff lying around somewhere in Detriot?
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,802
From: Annapolis MD
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
I'm glad they did this. Even if it is likely to be dilluted a little by the time it is for sale. It means that when I'm on the highway, I will be able to tell and American Sedan from a foreign one without having to read the badge. Way to get Bold Ford! 