Autocross and Road Racing Technique There is more to life than a straight line

Tubular vs Boxed LCA's any real difference?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2002 | 10:22 AM
  #1  
ZBLKHELLRZR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 972
From: The Haven, Fl
Question Tubular vs Boxed LCA's any real difference?

I've just replaced my Hotckis units that were heavy as hell. 10lbs each or more for one. Swapped in some adj tubular double rod end Comp Engineering alum LCA's that weigh 2lbs each.

Is there any benefit to having a lighter LCA? Is that considered unsprung weight? How will it affect wheel hop as I had none w/ the boxed units, haven't driven yet w/ the new pieces (down for the winter). Just wondering as I see many folks go to tubular I guess for clearance purposes.

Thanks.
Old Dec 6, 2002 | 10:50 AM
  #2  
I CORNER's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 136
From: Stuart, FL USA
Well the overall weight and unsprung weight reduction is a benefit.

However, your major improvement is lack of bind in the rear suspension during cornering. While your car has a "live" axle, it still needs to be able to articulate some (each side of the car needs to be able to move somewhat independently from the other). Did you notice that the stock rubber bushings were not solid, but appeared star shaped, so that the arms did not bind? Those poly bushings in the Hotckiss rear LCAs don't like it when the car leans some under heavy cornering. Where it get nasty, is when you are corning hard and then hit a bump. The bushings bind and the rear of the car immediately tries to come around on you.

With spherical bearings or rod-ended links, there is no bind. Did you say 2lbs for each arm? Sound very light. I certainly would want the rear LCAs to be very strong. My tubular Global West rear LCAs with spherical bearings probably weigh about 8lbs each.
Old Dec 6, 2002 | 04:41 PM
  #3  
ZBLKHELLRZR's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 972
From: The Haven, Fl
Thumbs up

Thanks for the info. 2lbs each. Well I took one off to weigh it again and the scale reads 2.89lbs. They are really light. They came of my partner's car we traded. LS1 w/ 500fwhp w/ the a 150 shot.

Won't be able to try them out til spring though. But when in his car they were quiet and didn't bind for nothing. That may have been a problem w/ him and launching.

Thanks again.
Old Dec 6, 2002 | 08:27 PM
  #4  
Suaveat69's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 167
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Anyone have a picture of the spherical bearings and the rod ended links? I know what the rod ends look like but the bearings?
Old Dec 6, 2002 | 10:41 PM
  #5  
I CORNER1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 52
From: Stuart, Florida
Go to Global West Suspensions at "http://www.globalwest.net/". They have some photos of the rear LCAs with spherical bearings.
Old Dec 8, 2002 | 05:42 PM
  #6  
Jon A's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 482
From: Mukilteo, WA
Cripes! 8, 10 lbs each? What a waste of metal! (I won't even mention the obvious lack of Engineering in the designs.)

My 2 lb aluminum LCA's were strong enough to bend my axle when I crashed backward into a hillside at the track this summer. How much stronger do they need to be?
Old Dec 9, 2002 | 05:21 PM
  #7  
94bird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 727
From: Wolverine Lake, MI
Small off topic here - hey Jon, how did you manage to register for this forum before PCs were even invented?
Old Dec 9, 2002 | 08:22 PM
  #8  
Dr.Mudge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,148
From: Bay Area, CA
LoL, now that is odd... Must have been on a DEC PDP machine back then, or maybe the same Honeywell that Al Gore used to create the internet with.
Old Dec 9, 2002 | 10:24 PM
  #9  
I CORNER1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 52
From: Stuart, Florida
Response to Jon A

Jon A,

Sorry to hear you crashed your car and bent the axle. I guess the aluminum LCAs are pretty strong when subjected to compression forces.

The estimate of 8lbs each for the GW LCAs was probably too much. 5lbs each is probably more accurate. I handled Hotckiss LCAs and the Metco solid aluminum boxed LCAs and both of these were much heavier than the GW LCAs.

On a vaguely related subject, I had an intake valve snap on me on a BME aluminum rodded Pontiac Super Duty 455 years ago. The rod as completely unaffected and was flexible enough to save the crankshaft and bearings! However, the iron head was complete toast. It is amazing what aluminum can do to steel, under compression forces. Unfortunately, good alloys are required to hold up under repeated stretch cycling from tensile forces.

Rick R
Old Dec 10, 2002 | 12:14 AM
  #10  
Jon A's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 482
From: Mukilteo, WA
Don't you guys know I'm on the cutting edge of technology? I never get credit! For example, Al Gore would not have been able to invent the internet had I not first invented the home PC!

Rick,

These are 6061-T6511 and are actually stronger in tension than compression (assuming both ends pinned for a buckling calculation). Did you read the links? You could chain 15 F-Bodies together and hang them from a set of these. With about .85" or so of thread protrusion the pullout of the rod end is about equal to the ultimate tensile strength of the arm. Strong enough...and much, much stronger than the stock LCA's.
Old Dec 10, 2002 | 07:39 AM
  #11  
chuck's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 906
I have the LG aluminum LCA's and PHB with double rod ends, and they survived a laterat trip across the rumble strips at MSR yesterday.
Old Dec 16, 2002 | 02:21 PM
  #12  
WOT's Avatar
WOT
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 422
From: Louisville, KY, USA
Just for reference

Just for reference my stock LCA's weighed 4.25lbs each and my G2 poly/rod LCA's were 3.75 lbs each.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
DirtyDaveW
Parts For Sale
1
Mar 15, 2015 07:01 PM
87Aerocoupe
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
0
Jan 10, 2015 07:27 PM
lbrowne
LT1 Based Engine Tech
25
Nov 13, 2011 04:25 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 AM.