Appearance Hoods, spoilers, custom mods, accessories, etc.

What is the uglyist camaro?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2004 | 10:38 PM
  #31  
ztalon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 60
From: New York
Even though my least favorite Camaro was the 2nd generation until the 78 model year, they still looked better than the meager selection of sporty cars back then. When they redesigned the front and rear of the 2nd gen in 78, it got a whole lot better looking.

93-97 ......best looking of all in my opinion. They still command a lot of attention even today. Haven't aged in the looks department at all. And the salad shooters don't look bad...particularly the chrome ones.

I don't mind the 98+, but prefer the SS because of the hood scoop.
Old May 24, 2004 | 10:22 PM
  #32  
Skull Leader's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 455
From: Skull-1 revival
Originally posted by Capn Pete
Hey, Camaros were around for 15 years before they built the style that you like (LT1 4th-gen), so you can't knock the ones in between, otherwise they wouldn't have made it to where they did. And maybe that big "mouth" isn't your favourite look, but under the hood is probably one of the best engines GM has ever built, and it seems to be becoming the new standard, like an old "350 Chevy" used to be the benchmark.
Everyone knows it was the Bandit TA that carried the F-bodies popularity through the rough years.

I can't argue the LS1 was one if not THE best engine GM put in a car. But then again, if you didn't like the fishy look of the Camaro, there was always the hamburger bun bumper look of the Formula/TA instead.
Old May 24, 2004 | 10:30 PM
  #33  
lbls1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 343
That is a really hard question. I'll answer this one in terms of my opinion.

Best looking: First Gen '67-'69.

Then all others in this order: '70-'73, '98-'02, '78-'81, '93-'97,'74-'77, '82-'92.

My all time favorites are the '67-'68, and the '77 z28.

There were no bad looking camaros in my book!

PS: can't argue the fact that the LS1 was the best overall regular production engine ever installed in a camaro. (and one of the best GM engines ever).

Its ashame how some things become so good, then their gone.

Last edited by lbls1; May 24, 2004 at 10:33 PM.
Old May 24, 2004 | 10:36 PM
  #34  
MikeStank's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 267
From: McKeesport, PA, USA
yea, i guess there really are no ugly camaros, but there were sure some ugly firebirds.
Old May 25, 2004 | 04:06 PM
  #35  
TheV6Bird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,040
From: New Haven, CT
Originally posted by MikeStank
yea, i guess there really are no ugly camaros, but there were sure some ugly firebirds.
Very early 3rd gen Camaros and Firebirds are nasty, but a front end swap easily clears that up

The ugliest Camaros are the totally riced out ones with gigantic wings, stickers, bad paint, and bad wheels.
Old May 26, 2004 | 11:02 AM
  #36  
94camarof1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 169
From: Sheldon, Iowa
Re: What is the uglyist camaro?

Originally posted by Ville H. Valo
what do you think, year, type, several years that look the same?

I think that the 1993 - 1997 camaros are the worst. and the 1982 - 1985
coming from the owner of one of the ugliest/slowest camaro's ever
Old May 26, 2004 | 03:02 PM
  #37  
NBred94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 427
From: Houston
IROC and Z28 third gens look good to my eyes (minus the hoover dam spoiler on the later models) but there's something toxic about those early 80's berlinettas

EEEW!

It's like a Buick Camaro or something.
Old May 26, 2004 | 07:08 PM
  #38  
Sandman_97Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 369
From: Mesa, AZ
IMO the early 3rd gens are probably the worst, followed VERY closely by the 98-2002 catfish/concorde. Both ugly.

Originally posted by Capn Pete
Hey, Camaros were around for 15 years before they built the style that you like (LT1 4th-gen), so you can't knock the ones in between, otherwise they wouldn't have made it to where they did. And maybe that big "mouth" isn't your favourite look, but under the hood is probably one of the best engines GM has ever built, and it seems to be becoming the new standard, like an old "350 Chevy" used to be the benchmark.
Dude we're not talking about engines. Quit taking offense because you drive a catfish/concorde.
Old May 26, 2004 | 09:27 PM
  #39  
Lt1 and Ls1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,460
From: Texas
I have to disagree, the 91 and 92s are SWEET!! The 98 - 02s are sweet too. 70s are awesome too
Old May 26, 2004 | 09:39 PM
  #40  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Originally posted by Sandman_97Z
IMO the early 3rd gens are probably the worst, followed VERY closely by the 98-2002 catfish/concorde. Both ugly.

Dude we're not talking about engines. Quit taking offense because you drive a catfish/concorde.
Oooooooooooh buddy...........dem's be fightin' words!!!



Hey, it's all a matter of opinion, right? I don't like the close resemblance between the 4th-gen Camaros and Chryslers, but it doesn't mean I don't like how my Camaro looks.

All that counts is you like your car, which I do. Oh, and the '98+ 4th-gens just happen to have the LS1.....in case I forgot to mention that before!!!!
Old May 26, 2004 | 10:04 PM
  #41  
blackbirdta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,372
From: Reston, Virginia
first gen- love em
early second gen- love em
mid second gen- bumpers are gay
late second gen- pretty sweet
early third gen- no
85-90- ok
91-92- pretty sweet
93-97- lose the salad shooters and they're sweet
98+ sweet

of course the best would be the LT1 SS (although i would take a nice clean classic first gen or 70-73 second gen too)
Old May 27, 2004 | 06:24 PM
  #42  
Sandman_97Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 369
From: Mesa, AZ
Originally posted by Capn Pete
Oooooooooooh buddy...........dem's be fightin' words!!!



Hey, it's all a matter of opinion, right? I don't like the close resemblance between the 4th-gen Camaros and Chryslers, but it doesn't mean I don't like how my Camaro looks.

All that counts is you like your car, which I do.
I completely agree

Originally posted by Capn Pete
Oh, and the '98+ 4th-gens just happen to have the LS1.....in case I forgot to mention that before!!!!
All that means is you're faster in a straight line......and where's the fun in that?

Just kiddin around......
Old May 27, 2004 | 11:47 PM
  #43  
Jilly's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 600
Worst - 3rd gens
Best - 1st gens
Old May 30, 2004 | 03:41 PM
  #44  
Ville H. Valo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 179
From: Carmel, California
wow
Old Jun 3, 2004 | 08:48 AM
  #45  
stangkilla1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 497
From: Atlanta, Ga
Yea bad place to post this but......




1983-4 3rd gen Berlinetta, 4cyl.
No GFx kit and a 4 banger to boot!!!!!! just plain ooooogly, but I still give it a speck of respect because it is a camaro and I cant hate the army because of one ugly slow soldier.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 AM.