Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

solid roller lifter HELP needed !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 9, 2003 | 03:58 PM
  #1  
MSM69Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 116
solid roller lifter HELP needed !

got a 383 with a crower .950 small base circle solid roller cam. this is in a late model block (87-95) with the taller lifter bores. i see comp cams sells lifters 883 and 893. 883 is .300" longer than standard lifter and 893 is supposed to work with small base circle cams.

http://www.compcams.com/catalog/263.html

since i have a combination of both, i need to know what lifter to order.

i measured the length needed from base circle to top of lifter bore which is 2.520". i am not sure if either of these lifters "vertical linking bar" will still hit the top of the lifter bore. anyone have any suggestions or information. i need to get this ordered asap. this is the only thing holding me up from wrapping up this beast.

thanks,

mike
Old Mar 9, 2003 | 05:01 PM
  #2  
Jason Short's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 3,051
From: Rochester, NY USA
If you are using an LT1/LT4 block:

Comp cams Endure-X (CCA-888-16)
or
Crane 11522-16

Both are great lifters that have been used in LTx motors with great results

Jason
Old Mar 9, 2003 | 05:25 PM
  #3  
Turbo6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 368
From: Indianapolis, IN
Jason,
Concerning use of the Comp Endure-X vs. the Crane Solid roller lifter difference, do you know of any reason to go with the Endure-X over the crane's as there is about a $150 difference in price. Does one require the use of an oil restricter or do a better job of valvetrain stability or longevity than the other? Thanks.
Old Mar 9, 2003 | 05:52 PM
  #4  
MSM69Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 116
actually, not an LT1 block (i don't think), but still a late model block. the casting numbers is

14093638...350...87-95...2 or 4...Roller or flat tappet cam
one-piece rear seal

info found at:

http://www.mortec.com/castnum.htm

would this make a difference?

thanks,

mike
Old Mar 9, 2003 | 06:00 PM
  #5  
MSM69Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 116
also, any idea what the dimensions are from roller tip to bottom of link bar (vertical link bar not spring loaded lifters). i have 2.520" from cam base circle to top of lifter bore. can anyone confirm the .300" taller lifters dimensions?

thanks,
mike
Old Mar 9, 2003 | 06:21 PM
  #6  
STAR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 103
You can also machine down the lifter bore and use a standard size lifter.
Old Mar 9, 2003 | 06:56 PM
  #7  
MSM69Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 116
ouch. just got 2k worth of machine work done and engine is in car. not coming back out :-)

i'd duck tape two lifters together before that. :-)

mike
Old Mar 9, 2003 | 08:16 PM
  #8  
JordonMusser's Avatar
West South Central Moderator / Special Guest
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 1,650
From: Coppell, TX USA
the 11522s should work. I would stay away from the endurax. Ihave seen SEVERAL come appart.

I have run 11522s with a <.900 base circle cam in an LTX block NP
Old Mar 9, 2003 | 11:19 PM
  #9  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
The 883 will clear.

You will also need shorter pushrods most likely, but that's not a bad thing.

Having a pushrod checker is always a good idea.

Bret
Old Mar 10, 2003 | 08:00 AM
  #10  
Jason Short's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 3,051
From: Rochester, NY USA
As Jordon said, the 11522s are good...I use them in my motor as well. I have never personally seen anyone have problems with the EndureX lifters, but Jordon has so I am not sure what the story is on them. All of the applications that I have seen them used in have worked well.

The EndureX have an extra oiling groove in them, whereas the 11522s do not. Are they worth the $150 extra? Mabye....but I went with the 11522s and have not regreted it one bit.

Jason
Old Mar 10, 2003 | 09:42 AM
  #11  
MSM69Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 116
thanks fellas. you've been a great help.

mike
Old Mar 10, 2003 | 10:50 AM
  #12  
MSM69Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 116
one more thing. i see crane makes a 11552 which is the horizontal linking.

which do you guys think is better. vertical linking (with the spring for easy cam changes) or the horizontal linking.

11522 is around 280.00
11552 is around 380.00

the price difference worth anything. different quality or durability?

any help appreaciated.

thanks,

mike
Old Mar 10, 2003 | 10:52 AM
  #13  
MSM69Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 116
****, one more question. sorry.. lol

can the taller lifters be installed with the heads already on. i hope so because mine are on already. :-(

mike
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
4586
Parts Wanted
1
Mar 17, 2015 11:24 PM
HectorM52
Parts Wanted
2
Feb 11, 2015 09:33 AM
95chwagon
Parts For Sale
4
Jan 13, 2015 09:19 PM
siguy
Parts For Sale
3
Nov 27, 2014 10:07 AM
mjcent922
Car Audio and Electronics
10
Jul 27, 2002 12:42 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 AM.