Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

Manifold Isolators - Reducing Intake Air Temperature

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 25, 2004 | 01:03 AM
  #16  
Minotaur15's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 36
From: Neptune, NJ
Re: Manifold Isolators - Reducing Intake Air Temperature

Anybody know where one might buy some raw phenolic material? McMaster-Carr has one extremely expensive material under plastics called kevlar/phenolic garolite. Most the the Garolite family of products touts flame retardant properties, but that was the closest to being a good thermal insulator. So, whats the right stuff and where can it be purchased from.

BTW, that Kevlar/Phenolic Garolite costs $308 for a 12 x 24 x .125 sheet
Old Nov 25, 2004 | 01:12 PM
  #17  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Re: Manifold Isolators - Reducing Intake Air Temperature

Originally Posted by Minotaur15
Anybody know where one might buy some raw phenolic material? McMaster-Carr has one extremely expensive material under plastics called kevlar/phenolic garolite. Most the the Garolite family of products touts flame retardant properties, but that was the closest to being a good thermal insulator. So, whats the right stuff and where can it be purchased from.

BTW, that Kevlar/Phenolic Garolite costs $308 for a 12 x 24 x .125 sheet
I think you found the right source.


Originally Posted by 94bird
The general rule of thumb I've always used is 10 deg. F drop in charge temperature is worth 1% in power. I'm interested to see if anyone else here has found differently.
I think you are about right 1% is good for a NA motor.

Bret
Old Nov 26, 2004 | 10:36 AM
  #18  
Denny McLain's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 752
From: Double Oak TX
Re: Manifold Isolators - Reducing Intake Air Temperature

I’m going to chime in on the “icing the intake is a waste of time” and respectfully disagree based upon real world experience having been formerly sponsored by a dyno shop.. On the dyno you can consistently pick up 5-8 hp and 8-15 ft torque by icing down a LT series car. At the track you pick up about a tenth and 1 mph.

Iceing the intake is the real deal unless you start the car or allow it warm back up by sitting hours in the staging lane.

On a heavily ported intake and heavily ported heads the effect is not as great as one with more metal, but don’t think for a second cooler (read denser) air doesn’t help.

This comes from the school of "been there, done it" with probably 500 pulls on the dyno testing and tuning.
Old Nov 26, 2004 | 11:05 AM
  #19  
94bird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 727
From: Wolverine Lake, MI
Re: Manifold Isolators - Reducing Intake Air Temperature

Originally Posted by Denny McLain
I’m going to chime in on the “icing the intake is a waste of time” and respectfully disagree based upon real world experience having been formerly sponsored by a dyno shop..
Denny, I just skimmed through this thread again and don't see the post you're referring to that says "icing the intake is a waste of time". I don't think anyone would say that with any engine experience.
Old Nov 26, 2004 | 01:54 PM
  #20  
Denny McLain's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 752
From: Double Oak TX
Re: Manifold Isolators - Reducing Intake Air Temperature

"It would probably have about as much effect as blocking off the exhaust crossover passage on a carbureted intake manifold- very slight gain to be had. I'm sure it's gotta be worth something. People don't ice down their intake manifolds at the dragstrip for nothing."
__________________


I missed the "don't" in the earlier post. My apologies…. Just read a bit to fast I guess.

Interesting enough my LT4 intake is ported almost paper thin in some areas and the LE3 heads are pretty thin also. We iced everything down a couple of weeks ago during a tuning session just to see how much it would pick up and it only picked up 3hp and about 7lbs torque. This was after about five runs trying different water temps and cooling periods as it picked up virtually nothing on the first pass.

Not sure if it was because we had the tuning pretty much dead on prior icing the intake, a whole bunch of material removed and less to hold heat or just one of those days. I’m going to do it again after the first of the year as I typically see much more of a gain.

Frankly I’d like to see it replicate itself low again as icing is a pain in the butt.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DirtyDaveW
Forced Induction
13
Dec 1, 2016 05:37 PM
95chwagon
Parts For Sale
4
Jan 13, 2015 09:19 PM
Jazsun
Cars For Sale
0
Dec 29, 2014 12:14 PM
chevroletfreak
LT1 Based Engine Tech
202
Jul 4, 2005 05:00 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 AM.