LS motors: Big CI vs small CI + FI
LS motors: Big CI vs small CI + FI
Disclaimer: Mods, if you feel this is in the wrong section, I understand if it is moved - since it is a bit cross-platform, I was hoping to get some opinions from the experts.
So I've been giving myself an ulcer thinking about next year's project. I know I'm gonna be shooting for some big power (650+ RWHP) but I'm not exactly on the "How" I wanna get there
I guess it boils down to two categories: Big cubes or small (maybe even stock) cubes with FI.
There are pro's and con's with each obviously. Personally, I have always wanted to do a Procharger setup on maybe a stock-ish (347) cube, built motor. But then I look at it, and I could probably get near the numbers for a bit less money stay with an N/A setup on maybe a 427 or 454.
How about power efficiency? I'm guessing I would be safer on a big cube setup since I would be making a lower HP/CI number. I know both big cubes and FI are both gonna build good torque throughout the curve, but which curve is gonna be better for a mostly-street/some-strip car?
Reliability? I supposed you can make a case for both with proper tuning, fuel system, etc. I'm guessing long term and FI would be a bit more maintenance.
Risk? More could go wrong with FI I would assume, given boost adjustment, detonation, octane issues, etc. I know the LS block can handle good power given the proper tuning... but would this be pushing the limit?
Just thinking a bit out loud here. This topic is directed at my specific LS1 setup, however I supposed it could be compared against all SBC setups. I would appreciate the insight and experiences of people who have hammered out this issue themselves. I didn't make a poll because this is more of brainstorm session than a cut-and-dry decision right now.
Thanks all
So I've been giving myself an ulcer thinking about next year's project. I know I'm gonna be shooting for some big power (650+ RWHP) but I'm not exactly on the "How" I wanna get there
I guess it boils down to two categories: Big cubes or small (maybe even stock) cubes with FI.
There are pro's and con's with each obviously. Personally, I have always wanted to do a Procharger setup on maybe a stock-ish (347) cube, built motor. But then I look at it, and I could probably get near the numbers for a bit less money stay with an N/A setup on maybe a 427 or 454.
How about power efficiency? I'm guessing I would be safer on a big cube setup since I would be making a lower HP/CI number. I know both big cubes and FI are both gonna build good torque throughout the curve, but which curve is gonna be better for a mostly-street/some-strip car?
Reliability? I supposed you can make a case for both with proper tuning, fuel system, etc. I'm guessing long term and FI would be a bit more maintenance.
Risk? More could go wrong with FI I would assume, given boost adjustment, detonation, octane issues, etc. I know the LS block can handle good power given the proper tuning... but would this be pushing the limit?
Just thinking a bit out loud here. This topic is directed at my specific LS1 setup, however I supposed it could be compared against all SBC setups. I would appreciate the insight and experiences of people who have hammered out this issue themselves. I didn't make a poll because this is more of brainstorm session than a cut-and-dry decision right now.
Thanks all
My thoughts on the subject is to go for a 6.0 or ls2 block for more cubes. Forged crank will drop in and get you 408ci very easily. Run very mild compression and keep the cam simple. Run the best heads you can possibly afford with an eye toward the larger port sizes. Buy a nice big head unit for the supercharger setup so you have a little room to grow and plenty of airflow. That way you have a pretty decent size engine with good manners that will outpull the bigger n/a stuff all over the place.
Don't forget you need a really good rear end and transmission and a hell of a fuel system to keep it reliable and happy. If you dont know a good tuner find one and make very good and sure that they know how to tune forced induction ls1 cars. If you happen to get a hack for a tuner you're going to do nothing but scatter the engine all over the road or dyno.
Don't forget you need a really good rear end and transmission and a hell of a fuel system to keep it reliable and happy. If you dont know a good tuner find one and make very good and sure that they know how to tune forced induction ls1 cars. If you happen to get a hack for a tuner you're going to do nothing but scatter the engine all over the road or dyno.
I used to ask people that ask this kind of question 1 thing. Are you racing in a class that has a maximum displacement rule? If no, then build the biggest engine that you can.
These days I would also ask how important is fuel economy to you?
Two years ago I saw a 500" LS2 being put together. Now that there are even more tall deck blocks available, I'm wondering why there aren't more of these monster motors out there?
These days I would also ask how important is fuel economy to you?
Two years ago I saw a 500" LS2 being put together. Now that there are even more tall deck blocks available, I'm wondering why there aren't more of these monster motors out there?
Actually it's a bigger decision than that. If he goes NA and shoots for 600hp it's looking at very high flow heads with a long duration cam and high compression ratio.
My 500hp 396ci LT1 is a prime example. The fueling requirements for such in a NA means 39# injectors and a single walbro 255lph pump will suffice. Adding Nitrous for a 100 is pretty easy but beyond that the concerns of the pump keeping up comes into play.
A 600hp NA engine will probably be fine without more than a single pump, but the same design with FI will have less headroom.
To build a 600hp NA engine and "slap on a turbo" later means:
1) turbo, intercooler, plumbing oil lines, headers, ets...
2) fuel pump upgrade... dual probably plus new, BIG injectors.
3) a tranny than can handle 800+hp...
4) new heads... why? because no small cc combustion chamber used in NA is gonna play nice with FI at those levels. If not it gets worse... rebuild the bottom end with new pistons.
5) vaccum pump... not essiental for 600hp, but in a FI application that large you can expect a good amount of blow-up that needs some help.
Slapping on a turbo is NOT cheap, and in a high hp NA it's even worse...
Personally I went with more cubes (396 vs the 383 or 355 options common in LT1s) and decided a nitrous hit will suffice if I need more.
If you're set on FI you're way better off going with the strongest block you can find, cool and vaccume pump it, them boost the sucker with a big *** supercharger (easier to tune and install than a turbo for LT1's, though I imagine the same advantages of rpm-depandace and header availability applies to LS1 engines as well).
Ultimately the NA engine of the same hp will pull harder down low, be lighter, and probably cost less... but the options for more ponies afterwards are limited to Nitrous (and even that will probably require another pump and new pistons depending on how much you want to add).
"Just slapping on a turbo" consits of replacing about have the engine at those levels... it aint' any cheaper.
Superchargers also have the advantage than you can just pull the belt and get better gas milage and less hp (if say you have a kid you wants to borrow the car... although a good tune limited to say 3500rpms and timing retardrd can do just as well I guess).
My 500hp 396ci LT1 is a prime example. The fueling requirements for such in a NA means 39# injectors and a single walbro 255lph pump will suffice. Adding Nitrous for a 100 is pretty easy but beyond that the concerns of the pump keeping up comes into play.
A 600hp NA engine will probably be fine without more than a single pump, but the same design with FI will have less headroom.
To build a 600hp NA engine and "slap on a turbo" later means:
1) turbo, intercooler, plumbing oil lines, headers, ets...
2) fuel pump upgrade... dual probably plus new, BIG injectors.
3) a tranny than can handle 800+hp...
4) new heads... why? because no small cc combustion chamber used in NA is gonna play nice with FI at those levels. If not it gets worse... rebuild the bottom end with new pistons.
5) vaccum pump... not essiental for 600hp, but in a FI application that large you can expect a good amount of blow-up that needs some help.
Slapping on a turbo is NOT cheap, and in a high hp NA it's even worse...
Personally I went with more cubes (396 vs the 383 or 355 options common in LT1s) and decided a nitrous hit will suffice if I need more.
If you're set on FI you're way better off going with the strongest block you can find, cool and vaccume pump it, them boost the sucker with a big *** supercharger (easier to tune and install than a turbo for LT1's, though I imagine the same advantages of rpm-depandace and header availability applies to LS1 engines as well).
Ultimately the NA engine of the same hp will pull harder down low, be lighter, and probably cost less... but the options for more ponies afterwards are limited to Nitrous (and even that will probably require another pump and new pistons depending on how much you want to add).
"Just slapping on a turbo" consits of replacing about have the engine at those levels... it aint' any cheaper.
Superchargers also have the advantage than you can just pull the belt and get better gas milage and less hp (if say you have a kid you wants to borrow the car... although a good tune limited to say 3500rpms and timing retardrd can do just as well I guess).
What is the budget? What fuel does it have to run on? Why 650hp? What parts do you already have? Have you thought through the fact that with that kind of hp, the motor typically ends up only ~40% of the whole project cost? There are many more 650rwhp cars on the internet than on the road and there is a reason for this.
I don't think a hp goal is the way to go about it. I would start with an idea of what I wanted to do with the car and a budget. Get the most for your dollar you can, rather than pick a number.
Rich
I don't think a hp goal is the way to go about it. I would start with an idea of what I wanted to do with the car and a budget. Get the most for your dollar you can, rather than pick a number.
Rich
Well that is what I was kinda going for. Maybe I phrased it wrong. Money isn't exactly the biggest concern, I just want to make the most efficient, reliable power for the money. I understand that either setup will likely be in the 12k to 16k range when its all said and done.
Currently, its just a heads and cam car. Obviously, with the aim of the setup, the motor would pretty much be thrown out with either direction I go. I understand that I'm going to need a new fuel system, more suspension, etc. The 9 in is about to be ordered and I've already talked with a Trans guy...
I'm not saying that the car HAS to make 650 RWHP for me to deem this project a "success", I'm just kinda using it as a starting point for what I would like to get out of the car. Basically, a radical big cube motor, maybe 427, 454, etc. vs a built 347 with a D1 S/C at 12-15 PSI, blower cam, etc. The target would be 93 octane to retain a respectable amount of "street-ability", but could still make a few adjustments for a nice track setup as well.
I started with the 650 rwhp also as a point of comparison.... which setup, at that power level, would be more efficient? best torque curve? reliable? etc.
Believe me, I'm not one of those "I NEEDZ MOE HORZPOWA" kinda guys. They say every project needs a goal, and I thought I worded this correctly. Now I feel stupid lol
I just want to make the most efficient, reliable power for the money... I understand that I'm going to need a new fuel system, more suspension, etc. The 9 in is about to be ordered and I've already talked with a Trans guy...
The target would be 93 octane to retain a respectable amount of "street-ability", but could still make a few adjustments for a nice track setup as well.
... which setup, at that power level, would be more efficient? best torque curve? reliable? etc.
The target would be 93 octane to retain a respectable amount of "street-ability", but could still make a few adjustments for a nice track setup as well.
... which setup, at that power level, would be more efficient? best torque curve? reliable? etc.
The real issue I guess is streetabliity and the shape of the power curve. Having gone the big cubes direction with a 7000 redline, I'd say it was a good decision, though for 650hp you may not be in such great shape for idle surge... especially in a LSx which don't tend to like as big cams at idle. Once you get it tuned and dialed in you'll be fine, but I'd be careful about trying to break new ground on your first big engine... find some examples of similar builds and see if the owners have any tips on hp goals and specific parts to avoid or endorse. I learnt a lot by building my 396 (or in reality taking direction and supervision from gurus who knew what was up) but like I said, it was a LTx build so the parts and lessons aren't all directly transferable.
650 isn't gonna be easy, but with a high compression engine, and maybe a vaccum pump and the willingness to look at a true shaft rocker design you should be able to get there. With your concerns of idle and low rpm drivabliity I'd seriously consider a custom cam.
FI would make this easier on the engine build (less expensive heads, maybe even the same ones you use now) with some extra work in installation... though once it's built it probably is easier to up a few ponies as needed... plus the idle and drivabliity when off the boost would probably be better than a similar powered NA engine.
If you plan on road racing it or even auto cross I'd have to say big cubes win any contest, but on a strip the FI designs allow for some wicked launches using a transbreak, automatic tranny, and some big set of brass *****.

I imagine a auto tranny is a given for this build unless it is a road racer or like me you prefer a stick just for fun factor. Expect a T56 rebuild(s) with this much power... my 396 is chewing up the T56 in only a few months of driving... I expect I'll go with face-plated gears on rebuild. Turbo may be easier in this regard if you plan on sticking with a stick. Heavy torque down low makes it too easy to lug an engine without realizing the damage youre doing.
Nothing about big hp is cheap.
It's only a question of money. How much you have or want to spend will dictate what route is best to take. Stock displacement at either 6.0 or 6.2 is plenty big IMO, and will allow re-use of the stock crank which handles big power numbers without fail. With a well tuned twin turbo kit your number is easy to obtain. I think the easiest way to get there right now is building off the LS3 platform, block, crank, and heads. If you are using FI, adding those extra cubic inches for a street car only makes sense if you need to have that "408" or "427" decal on the hood...



I think for the power level you are looking at you will need a power adder no matter what for a "streetable" car. The larger the motor the less "wild" it will have to be.
