Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

How do you convert .050 duration from 1.5 rockers to 1.6's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 09:45 PM
  #1  
speed_demon24's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,245
From: Ocala, Florida
How do you convert .050 duration from 1.5 rockers to 1.6's

I'm thinking abuot getting the gm847 cam, but I have the 846 right now (222/230 with 1.5 rockers) and I was wondering what that converts to with 1.6 rockers. I'm thinking about the next XFI 230/236 but if its barley any bigger than my cam now there's no point. And how would the 242/248 XFI cam work compared to the gm847? 292/300 adv duration vs 296/304?

Last edited by speed_demon24; Nov 26, 2006 at 09:58 PM.
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 06:15 AM
  #2  
Damon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,147
From: Phila., PA
Since .050 duration is measured when the TAPPET is .050" off the base circle a different set of rocker arms won't change that at all. But I know what you're getting at. How much "bigger" will the cam act with higher ratio rockers? Figure 1.6s will effectively "add" about 4* more .050 duration than with the 1.5s. The difference is pretty modest.

Don't compare cams based on "advertised" duration and ESPECIALLY NOT GM CAMS. They measure advertised duration in a way that is rarely comparable to a typical aftermarket cam from Comp, Crane, etc. Even comparing based on standard .050 durations, LSA and ICL doesn't tell the whole story, but it's far better than using advertised durations.

Last edited by Damon; Nov 28, 2006 at 06:03 AM.
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 02:35 PM
  #3  
Ram Air 383's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 61
GM 847 (or Crane 109841) cam has advertised duration measured at .004" lift. Comp Cams measures advertised duration for XE/XFI cams at .006" lift. CC 242/248 is definitely a bigger cam.
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 07:13 AM
  #4  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Higher ratio rockers, unless the ratio gets so extreme as to cause geometry problems, are about as close to a "free lunch" as you can get in top-end mods. At low speeds, the cam will "act" pretty much the same as the valve events are not changed. At higher engine speeds, because of more area under the lift curve, there will be better cylinder filling and more power and torque.

However, if you are looking to substantially change where the valve events occur, you need a different cam regardless of the rockers used. What are you trying to accomplish by the change? What is the rest of your combo? How do you use the car? These are the kinds of things that need to be considered when picking a cam. But as stated above, regardless of the cam, higher ratio rockers usually give gains without a downside. OTOH, IF the cam has been truly optimzed for your combo and intended use there might be only a marginal difference with a rocker ratio change

Rich
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 11:38 AM
  #5  
speed_demon24's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,245
From: Ocala, Florida
Originally Posted by rskrause
Higher ratio rockers, unless the ratio gets so extreme as to cause geometry problems, are about as close to a "free lunch" as you can get in top-end mods. At low speeds, the cam will "act" pretty much the same as the valve events are not changed. At higher engine speeds, because of more area under the lift curve, there will be better cylinder filling and more power and torque.

However, if you are looking to substantially change where the valve events occur, you need a different cam regardless of the rockers used. What are you trying to accomplish by the change? What is the rest of your combo? How do you use the car? These are the kinds of things that need to be considered when picking a cam. But as stated above, regardless of the cam, higher ratio rockers usually give gains without a downside. OTOH, IF the cam has been truly optimzed for your combo and intended use there might be only a marginal difference with a rocker ratio change

Rich
I have every bolton except an electric waterpump, and my 846 cam isn't performing how I want it to. I'm not thinking about doing a rocker arm change, I'm just wondering if there would be any difference than the gm846 vs 230/236 XE or XFI cam since those are rated with 1.6 rockers and the 846 is rated with 1.6's. I'm probalby going to go with hte 847 cam though.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldschool
Parts For Sale
16
Feb 9, 2016 09:21 PM
carl.froehlich
LT1 Based Engine Tech
6
Mar 13, 2015 12:38 AM
alliance12364
Parts For Sale
3
Mar 6, 2015 04:39 PM
Red_94Formula
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
Jan 22, 2015 12:17 AM
thenewkid
New Member Introduction
5
Nov 27, 2014 09:41 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 PM.