Horsepower vs. Torque...
Your question makes no sense to me.
Horsepower is basically a result of an equation of torque and rpm.
It's not a "one or the other" kind of thing.
Horsepower is a measure of power, which is a technical term in physics. It measures the amount of work that a force does as it acts over time. Work is another technical term in physics. It measures the actual effect of a force in moving an object over a distance. If we move an object one foot by applying a force of one pound, we are said to be doing one foot-pound of work. If it takes us one second to move the object, we have exerted one foot-pound per second of power. A horsepower is 550 foot-pounds per second.
For a more detailed explanation, go to http://home.inu.net/davidstua/horsepower_and_torque.htm
Horsepower is basically a result of an equation of torque and rpm.
It's not a "one or the other" kind of thing.
Horsepower is a measure of power, which is a technical term in physics. It measures the amount of work that a force does as it acts over time. Work is another technical term in physics. It measures the actual effect of a force in moving an object over a distance. If we move an object one foot by applying a force of one pound, we are said to be doing one foot-pound of work. If it takes us one second to move the object, we have exerted one foot-pound per second of power. A horsepower is 550 foot-pounds per second.
For a more detailed explanation, go to http://home.inu.net/davidstua/horsepower_and_torque.htm
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 173
From: from the land of Justin Wilson and Huey Long!
I understand everyone's concern with the question but I purposely simplified it b/c it is a very complicated subject...
What made me post is the thread on the 10.8 second 350 turbo diesel posted in the lounge. Lots of torque, lots of extended hp (for a diesel) but a low mph...never the less a respectable et. Some builders spin the engines up higher relying on hp. Others don't concentrate on the rpms so much and go for the torque. It's been done both ways (winning), but I really want a discussion on what makes a vehicle cross the traps "faster"....
What made me post is the thread on the 10.8 second 350 turbo diesel posted in the lounge. Lots of torque, lots of extended hp (for a diesel) but a low mph...never the less a respectable et. Some builders spin the engines up higher relying on hp. Others don't concentrate on the rpms so much and go for the torque. It's been done both ways (winning), but I really want a discussion on what makes a vehicle cross the traps "faster"....
Registered User
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 884
From: I reached back like a pimp and smacked that LS1....
Well, RPM x Torque/5252 = HP.
It's easier to think of it as "which one will get you through the traps fastest, high rpm or low rpm torque".
Higher horsepower is just the ability to produce more torque at higher rpm.
For example, if you have 500ft/lbs at 5000 rpm's you have 476hp at the same rpm.
If you can make 500ft/lbs at 7000 rpm's you have 666 hp at the same rpm.
A diesel is by nature a low rpm machine. AFAIK, they will never even reach 5252 rpm, therefore always having higher torque than horsepower.
It's easier to think of it as "which one will get you through the traps fastest, high rpm or low rpm torque".
Higher horsepower is just the ability to produce more torque at higher rpm.
For example, if you have 500ft/lbs at 5000 rpm's you have 476hp at the same rpm.
If you can make 500ft/lbs at 7000 rpm's you have 666 hp at the same rpm.
A diesel is by nature a low rpm machine. AFAIK, they will never even reach 5252 rpm, therefore always having higher torque than horsepower.
Originally posted by INTMD8
It's easier to think of it as "which one will get you through the traps fastest, high rpm or low rpm torque".
Higher horsepower is just the ability to produce more torque at higher rpm.
It's easier to think of it as "which one will get you through the traps fastest, high rpm or low rpm torque".
Higher horsepower is just the ability to produce more torque at higher rpm.
Good answer=>
Grumpy used to say it was HP,
but it's more average HP and TQ
in the highest RPM band you can run the motor in.
------------------------------------
Good answer=>
Your question makes no sense to me.
Horsepower is basically a result
of an equation of torque and rpm.
It's not a "one or the other" kind of thing.
---------------------------------
Torque without motion produces no work
No work..no power
No power ..can't win anything
Torque = ( HP * 5252 ) / RPM
HP = ( Torque * RPM ) / 5252
whenever you have more Torque
at a given RPM
you also have more HP at that RPM
whenever you have more Horsepower
at a given RPM
you also have more Torque at that RPM
increasing Torque is the same thing
as increasing Horsepower at the same RPM
Which engine will accelerate down the DragStrip the fastest ET/MPH ??
a 1250 HP engine with 800 Peak Torque
or
a 1150 HP engine with 800 Peak Torque
(if the amount of Peak TQ was the real answer)
then how can any engine on Earth
ever accelerate past its peak Torque RPM ??
next time you go to DragStrip
shift at peak Torque point
and see if you go faster
next time you go to DragStrip
don't let the engine past peak Torque RPM point
and see if you go faster
does NASCAR go around the Track the "fastest" at
Peak Torque RPM ??
does NASCAR "gear" their race cars to go around
the Track at Peak Torque RPM ??
does a Drag Boat go faster in the water
at Peak Torque RPM ??
Peak Torque is basically "LOCKED" into
2 major components ;
1-engine size in cubic inches
2-Compression Ratio
so after you have pretty much
exhausted peak torque gains
you have to then find a way
to shift the same peak torque
higher in rpms
so, in all forms of MotorSports
the only way to go faster
is to find a way to make the
same peak torque
but at a higher RPM (which is HP)
and ultimately=> HP/CID Ratio
and HP/Weight Ratio rules
(example=> Formula 1)
does a Formula 1 race engine
go the fastest around the Track at Peak Torque ??
does a Land Speed record streamliner keep the
engine at peak torque RPM point ??
why do Formula 1 engines turn so high??
why do ProStock Cars / Bikes / etc turn so high ??
why "doesn't" NHRA rate SuperStock and Stock Eliminator
on rated Torque/Weight Ratio ??
Will any of the above examples ever win races
keeping the engine at peak torque RPM ???
-----------------------------------------------
so whats the answer ?
it's the highest average HP and TQ amounts
in the highest RPM band you can sucessfully
run the engine in, that is ultimately capable
of wining races
Grumpy used to say it was HP,
but it's more average HP and TQ
in the highest RPM band you can run the motor in.
------------------------------------
Good answer=>
Your question makes no sense to me.
Horsepower is basically a result
of an equation of torque and rpm.
It's not a "one or the other" kind of thing.
---------------------------------
Torque without motion produces no work
No work..no power
No power ..can't win anything
Torque = ( HP * 5252 ) / RPM
HP = ( Torque * RPM ) / 5252
whenever you have more Torque
at a given RPM
you also have more HP at that RPM
whenever you have more Horsepower
at a given RPM
you also have more Torque at that RPM
increasing Torque is the same thing
as increasing Horsepower at the same RPM
Which engine will accelerate down the DragStrip the fastest ET/MPH ??
a 1250 HP engine with 800 Peak Torque
or
a 1150 HP engine with 800 Peak Torque
(if the amount of Peak TQ was the real answer)
then how can any engine on Earth
ever accelerate past its peak Torque RPM ??
next time you go to DragStrip
shift at peak Torque point
and see if you go faster
next time you go to DragStrip
don't let the engine past peak Torque RPM point
and see if you go faster
does NASCAR go around the Track the "fastest" at
Peak Torque RPM ??
does NASCAR "gear" their race cars to go around
the Track at Peak Torque RPM ??
does a Drag Boat go faster in the water
at Peak Torque RPM ??
Peak Torque is basically "LOCKED" into
2 major components ;
1-engine size in cubic inches
2-Compression Ratio
so after you have pretty much
exhausted peak torque gains
you have to then find a way
to shift the same peak torque
higher in rpms
so, in all forms of MotorSports
the only way to go faster
is to find a way to make the
same peak torque
but at a higher RPM (which is HP)
and ultimately=> HP/CID Ratio
and HP/Weight Ratio rules
(example=> Formula 1)
does a Formula 1 race engine
go the fastest around the Track at Peak Torque ??
does a Land Speed record streamliner keep the
engine at peak torque RPM point ??
why do Formula 1 engines turn so high??
why do ProStock Cars / Bikes / etc turn so high ??
why "doesn't" NHRA rate SuperStock and Stock Eliminator
on rated Torque/Weight Ratio ??
Will any of the above examples ever win races
keeping the engine at peak torque RPM ???
-----------------------------------------------
so whats the answer ?
it's the highest average HP and TQ amounts
in the highest RPM band you can sucessfully
run the engine in, that is ultimately capable
of wining races
This is the best discussion I've seen of power vs. acceleration:
http://mclements.net/mrc-PowerTorque.html
http://mclements.net/mrc-PowerTorque.html
Originally posted by MaxRaceSoftware
in all forms of MotorSports
the only way to go faster
is to find a way to make the
same peak torque
but at a higher RPM
in all forms of MotorSports
the only way to go faster
is to find a way to make the
same peak torque
but at a higher RPM
Bud ;
if you could move the very same power curve to a higher RPM band ..you could go faster without having to use a variable ratio transmission
and last statement in that same post was ;
so whats the answer ?
it's the highest average HP and TQ amounts
in the highest RPM band you can sucessfully
run the engine in, that is ultimately capable
of wining races
if you could move the very same power curve to a higher RPM band ..you could go faster without having to use a variable ratio transmission
and last statement in that same post was ;
so whats the answer ?
it's the highest average HP and TQ amounts
in the highest RPM band you can sucessfully
run the engine in, that is ultimately capable
of wining races
Yeah, but that's a big if, isn't it? Wouldn't every engine builder love to find a way to maintain the same power spread at a higher engine speed?
But you last statement sounds logical.
BTW, I was just reading about Kenny Roberts and the TZ750 powered flattracker. His remark about having a that bike (which had way more peak hp than any of his competitors) was "They don't pay me enough to ride that thing!"
But you last statement sounds logical.
BTW, I was just reading about Kenny Roberts and the TZ750 powered flattracker. His remark about having a that bike (which had way more peak hp than any of his competitors) was "They don't pay me enough to ride that thing!"
Last edited by Bud M; Feb 22, 2004 at 08:15 PM.
MaxRaceSoftware,
You pretty much said it all. Even though it seems simple not too many people get it for some unknown reason. I don't even worry because it's the people that argue about stuff like this who's money you can always take in any race!
CAJUN-Z,
RWTQ, which is what is accelerating your car is proportional to the engine power at that point so you will always accelerate fastest when you keep the motor in it's "power" band and gear appropriately.
Getting a car down a 1/4 mile is WORK and doing it in a given time period is POWER, so POWER is where you're looking if you want to get somewhere FAST!
You pretty much said it all. Even though it seems simple not too many people get it for some unknown reason. I don't even worry because it's the people that argue about stuff like this who's money you can always take in any race!
CAJUN-Z,
RWTQ, which is what is accelerating your car is proportional to the engine power at that point so you will always accelerate fastest when you keep the motor in it's "power" band and gear appropriately.
Getting a car down a 1/4 mile is WORK and doing it in a given time period is POWER, so POWER is where you're looking if you want to get somewhere FAST!
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 173
From: from the land of Justin Wilson and Huey Long!
Originally posted by Chris 96 WS6
This is the best discussion I've seen of power vs. acceleration:
http://mclements.net/mrc-PowerTorque.html
This is the best discussion I've seen of power vs. acceleration:
http://mclements.net/mrc-PowerTorque.html
BTW, HP vs. Torque is really what I want...


