Head Gaskets
Re: Head Gaskets
Jared, you may consider stock LT1 (f-body) gaskets to *try*. The only reason I say that is because there have been a handful of fast guys that have ran them in the past with no problems. I think they are a good gasket...just thick for most people
.049" and I believe the bore is slightly smaller than 4.125" but I may be wrong.
It may be worth a try....stock gaskets and ARP studs.
Jason
.049" and I believe the bore is slightly smaller than 4.125" but I may be wrong.It may be worth a try....stock gaskets and ARP studs.
Jason
Re: Head Gaskets
Originally Posted by markinkc69z
Make sure you have stiff wrist pins, and not too much running bore clearance. You can check piston rock with the heads off, but it won't tell you much about what happens when the pistons warm up. If you get by with it, you'll be a hero of sorts. I was in a position with a former job to be able to ask major successful engine builders about this subject and couldn't get a single one of them to go any tighter than .034" on a high performance motor. A friend of mine builds his own asphalt oval track engines and has gone as tight as .029" and had the pistons leave the part number in the quench of the head. While I never saw it, I do believe him. I have been interested in how tight you could run the piston to head clearance on a steel rod small block for a long time as I think you could get away with more compression on pump gas that way. Good luck.
By the way, the composite MrGasket Ultra Seal head gaskets provide an excellent seal. The problem comes when you want to take the heads off. Cleaning those gaskets off can make you hate life. I am not a believer in using scotchlock pads on an engine.
By the way, the composite MrGasket Ultra Seal head gaskets provide an excellent seal. The problem comes when you want to take the heads off. Cleaning those gaskets off can make you hate life. I am not a believer in using scotchlock pads on an engine.
Have run a measured .030 on the street with a tight fitting piston..0035-.0040
I was told some 30 year ago by a well respected engine builder that "they run their best when the piston just kisses the head" and I have run a few engines like that to see and he is right. The amount of clearance is determined by how brave ya are or how much experience ya have with such things.RPM's plays a big part too as well as piston fit. Your measuring tools had better be calibrated RIGHT too.
Re: Head Gaskets
I don't see where the gains in power are going to come from .005" tighter quench... You want it tight but too tight is REALLY bad. Personally "kissing the head with the piston" is a sure fire way to lead parts to a early failure... I'd hate to see what the pins look like when it's all said and done.
Bret
Bret
Re: Head Gaskets
Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
I don't see where the gains in power are going to come from .005" tighter quench... You want it tight but too tight is REALLY bad. Personally "kissing the head with the piston" is a sure fire way to lead parts to a early failure... I'd hate to see what the pins look like when it's all said and done.
Bret
Bret
It' a bitch when the car comes in after qualifying and it sounds like ya got an exhaust leak,but you know it's not a leak. Time to break out the wrenches and go a tad thicker.
Ya don't touch the head ya just come very very close like blowing a kiss at it.
Re: Head Gaskets
lol thanks again guys. I think I am going to keep the chastity belt on my pistons. They are too young to be going out and experiementing with those "heads". 
Ive decided to tear apart the motor first and then do my parts ordering after carefully getting some good measurements. Ill post back up after all is said and done.

Ive decided to tear apart the motor first and then do my parts ordering after carefully getting some good measurements. Ill post back up after all is said and done.
Re: Head Gaskets
Originally Posted by atljar
lol thanks again guys. I think I am going to keep the chastity belt on my pistons. They are too young to be going out and experiementing with those "heads". 
Ive decided to tear apart the motor first and then do my parts ordering after carefully getting some good measurements. Ill post back up after all is said and done.

Ive decided to tear apart the motor first and then do my parts ordering after carefully getting some good measurements. Ill post back up after all is said and done.
Just keep um in the hole and you'll be allright.
Re: Head Gaskets
Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
I don't see where the gains in power are going to come from .005" tighter quench... You want it tight but too tight is REALLY bad. Personally "kissing the head with the piston" is a sure fire way to lead parts to a early failure... I'd hate to see what the pins look like when it's all said and done.
Bret
Bret
I've seen back to back dyno tests with tighter and tighter quench (Circle Track years ago) and there comes a point of diminishing returns. Too many variables for an accurate approximation. Street car... "NO".... race car.... "NO" is good there too.
-Mindgame
Re: Head Gaskets
My take here as it applies to the word kiss. My interpretation of kiss is consistant to that of Larry's. Technically, that being ZERO clearance. Is it practical? Regardless, striving for any given figure, first you need an accurate method of checking. Do not even consider clay when it comes to determining clearance. Get comfortable using a good depth mike... accurately. Block MUST be 'square'. Assure yourself pistons are (and remain) square in hole before bothering to measure. Time is money, and I'm not talking taking a couple of minutes to check/measure quench. If the checking/measuring is not accurate, it's value will be questioned..
Last edited by arnie; May 14, 2005 at 09:01 AM.
Re: Head Gaskets
Originally Posted by arnie
My take here as it applies to the word kiss. My interpretation of kiss is consistant to that of Larry's. Technically, that being ZERO clearance. Is it practical? Regardless, striving for any given figure, first you need an accurate method of checking. Do not even consider clay when it comes to determining clearance. Get comfortable using a good depth mike... accurately. Block MUST be 'square'. Assure yourself pistons are (and remain) square in hole before bothering to measure. Time is money, and I'm not talking taking a couple of minutes to check/measure quench. If the checking/measuring is not accurate, it's value will be questioned..
And again, what is the gain? As I recall, "near zero" vs " ~.020 was worth something on the order of .005% for a 700hp race engine.
-Mindgame
Re: Head Gaskets
Originally Posted by SStrokerAce
Yeah if you want to replace piston pins, go for it. 4340 ones are cheap, Honda sized DLC coated ones are not. Hell Tool Steel or 9310 pins aren't cheap in my book!
Bret
Bret
Like I said,with the a forged bottom end @7000 there is no need to be afraid of .030 and that includes all the "stack" clearances ya can add. Like I also said ya better be able to measure correctly. Been there done that.
Already have a couple running with .030 in them.Would they have run as good with .035,maybe,but not with .045-.060.
Ya don't win races following somebody.
Am I saying .030 is for the masses-- NO. I am saying it can be done with experience in doing it. If ya don't want to do it, then don't.But if ya come out with .035,then there is no sense in spending heavy bucks for a gasket to go to .040 or more.
What do ya think the intentions of someone is that profiles a set of dome piston's. This makes the whole top of the piston quench and ya better have a tight piston fit and more than.030 in them
Try to find a rod manufacturer to tell ya how much rod stretch their rod has at any given RPM
and temp. Try to get crank flex and block wiggle spec's.Good luck..
Edit: Don't try this with a stock bottom end-- It won't work. I use a particular set up that I know works.
Last edited by 1racerdude; May 14, 2005 at 03:40 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM



