Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

Effects of Compression Ratio effects on Power/Powerband

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 07:00 AM
  #1  
Fastbird93's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,827
From: Waynesboro, PA
Effects of Compression Ratio effects on Power/Powerband

Something I've been wondering. Given the same two motors with the exact same setup, one with about a 9.0-9.5 (something a blower/turbo could go on and work well) compression ratio, and the other with about a 11.0-11.5 compression ratio for N/A. Feasibly, how much of a power difference are we talking about???

Reason I ask is that I *may* be looking at a rebuild shortly if bad news comes on my car. That said, I want to go power adder in the not to far future, and would like to have a motor in place rather than rebuild another one.

Asked this here because I figured I'd get a better answer and it might be useful. Mods move if you deem necessary!!
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 08:31 AM
  #2  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
It's going to effect your cam selection more than anything. The higher compression motor can take more camshaft and still be a "street" car. Meaning it will be driveable.

If you build it for a blower and put a blower cam in it, it's bascially going to be unimpressive NA but work really well on the blower.

Bret
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 08:34 AM
  #3  
Fastbird93's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,827
From: Waynesboro, PA
I was thinking of something like a 224/236, something that's ok on N/A but is ready for a blower. Or, a cam swap prior to a blower/turbo isn't that big of a deal.

Say I go with an 847 or even keep the 224/230. Feasibly how much would I cost myself by going with the lower compression ratio??
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 08:37 AM
  #4  
SStrokerAce's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Originally posted by Fastbird93
I was thinking of something like a 224/236, something that's ok on N/A but is ready for a blower. Or, a cam swap prior to a blower/turbo isn't that big of a deal.

Say I go with an 847 or even keep the 224/230. Feasibly how much would I cost myself by going with the lower compression ratio??
Powerwise not as much, but power and driveablity you will suffer on both a large amount.
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 01:57 PM
  #5  
MaxRaceSoftware's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 291
From: Abbeville , LA
with the exact same setup, one with about a 9.0-9.5 (something a blower/turbo could go on and work well) compression ratio, and the other with about a 11.0-11.5 compression ratio for N/A. Feasibly, how much of a power difference are we talking about???
------------------------------------------------------------------------

approx 10.0 hp to as much as 26 hp gains per point in CR
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 02:09 PM
  #6  
Fastbird93's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,827
From: Waynesboro, PA
So what I'm understanding here is that I could be leaving 50ish HP worst case on the table by going N/A with a 9.0 compression ratio. AND driveability would be affected?? Dang, this is going to be a descision.
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 02:12 PM
  #7  
MaxRaceSoftware's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 291
From: Abbeville , LA
So what I'm understanding here is that I could be leaving 50ish HP worst case on the table by going N/A with a 9.0 compression
===========================================

"ONLY" => if "no" detonation occurs , octane and timing curve are correct for your application
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nayr
LT1 Based Engine Tech
7
Mar 3, 2023 08:34 PM
13qtr
Parts For Sale
24
Oct 28, 2016 08:11 PM
surreybrad
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
Sep 29, 2015 09:00 PM
Daluchman1974
Cars For Sale
1
Sep 11, 2015 06:12 AM
92_RS_305
Cars For Sale
1
Sep 8, 2015 07:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 PM.