Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

Carburetor choice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 02:20 AM
  #1  
camaro75racer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 74
Question Carburetor choice

Ok to start the motor is a sbc 406, 6" rods, KB flat tops, 306/298 .499/.502 solid roller cam, Pro-Topline 200cc runner heads with 2.02/1.60 valves,RPM Perf. intake for now(going to single plane later). The question is on carburetor choice, i was looking at a 725cfm Demon, 750 Edelbrock and 750 Holley. The Demon is the cheapest but ive heard that the parts quality is great on them. I was wondering if i would see a noticeable amount of performance loss with it flowing 25cfm less than the other 2 carb's. Anyone that could help me with this i would greatly appreciate it. Thanks in advance.
Dale
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 09:41 AM
  #2  
OldSStroker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,931
From: Upstate NY
It probably would help to know driveline and how car will be used.

IMO, 750 is too small.

I don't understand only .500 lift with a 300 deg (advertised) SR. That's only .333 lobe lift (with 1.5 RR) which seems lower than almost all SRs.
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 01:11 PM
  #3  
StudyTime's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 735
From: BTR, Louisiana
I don't really mean to use your thread as a plug for me, but if you do decide to go with a 750 I have a new double pumper I am trying to sell. It and one just like it was used on a tunnel ram on a 502. They were used for six months.

It's a 750 cfm double pumper (mechanical secondary) with the four-corner idle adjustment. It has been upgraded with a proform main-body. You can PM me if you are interested in it.

I certainly would not recommend the Edelbrock although I have no personal anecdotal experience, but every one I have talked to wishes they would have went with a Holley.

If you tell us what you're using it for we may be able to help you some. Check with places like

allcarbs.com and thecarbshop.com

If you need any help they may be albe to assist you in putting a custom carb together.

Ben T.
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 06:09 PM
  #4  
camaro75racer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 74
OldSStroker
It has a TH350 tranny with 2400 stall, 3.73 gears and detroit locker. I drive it pretty much every day and take it to the track on thursday nights (grudge night here). I wanted to keep it easy to drive on the street was the reason for the cam choice.
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 08:21 PM
  #5  
Damon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,147
From: Phila., PA
On a dual- plane intake you want a BIG carb. 750 CFM is probably about the smallest I would go. On a single plane a 750 is fine.

Old school reasoning: on a dual-plane any given cylinder only "sees" half the carb. On a single plane it sees all 4 barrels. My expereince has been that there's a bit of truth to this.

Even my mild 350 street motors just LOVE to have an 800 CFM Qjet sitting on top of their dual-plane intakes. On a single plane intake the motors seem to run nearly as well with a vac. sec Holley as small as 650 CFM (spread bore Holley carb) vs. the higher flowing QJet.

Go figure.
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 07:14 AM
  #6  
OldSStroker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,931
From: Upstate NY
Originally posted by camaro75racer
It has a TH350 tranny with 2400 stall, 3.73 gears and detroit locker. I drive it pretty much every day and take it to the track on thursday nights (grudge night here). I wanted to keep it easy to drive on the street was the reason for the cam choice.
I still don't understand a 300* (advertised) cam for your application, but nevermind..

How about a vacuum secondary 870 Holley? They have some great ones out-of-the-box now. Very driveable and you get the flow the engine needs at the high end.

As Damon said, the Q-jet airvalve carb acts like a vac.sec. carb as it opens airvalve based on demand. My OHC 230 Pontiac I6 (1966) had a 750 Q-jet stock. That might have been one of the first uses of that carb, BTW.

My $.02
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 08:57 PM
  #7  
white97z/28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 164
IMO, 870 is way too big for that motor, if it was me, id get a 750 double pumper or 750 road demon. An 800 might be suitable for the dual plane, but Switch intakes to a victor jr. and get rid of that messed up cam too, what kind of cam is that BTW, crane, comp?? Id go with a bigger cam than that, too much duration and not enough lift. Id get a hyrd. roller in the .550 range with about the same duration and some dual springs. Just my 2 cents.
Old Mar 31, 2004 | 08:35 AM
  #8  
Mike383LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 522
From: york pa
carb

take a look at the holley 770 steet avenger pt#080770
Old Mar 31, 2004 | 09:03 AM
  #9  
StudyTime's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 735
From: BTR, Louisiana
Question

Do you have any specific reasons for recommending the street avenger? I've noticed this carb has been heavily marketed lately.

I don't see what makes them different than any other Holley. They come pretty close out of the box. Was Holley just trying broaden their market? Increase sales?

IMO, a 750 4150 Holley tuned with a wideband would be an even better choice.



Ben T.
Old Mar 31, 2004 | 11:06 AM
  #10  
Mike383LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 522
From: york pa
street avenger

i work for a speed shop and i bet we sell between 5-7 street avengers a week anywhere from the 570 up to the new 870 i have never heard a bad report from any of the customers who have bought these carbs i saw that he drives this car a lot on the street the carb takes very little work out of the box to run good if this was a race car i agree 750-800 cfm mech. secondares carb would probley be a better choice

Last edited by Mike383LT1; Mar 31, 2004 at 11:12 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff1904
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
5
Jun 5, 2016 05:00 PM
surreybrad
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
Sep 29, 2015 09:00 PM
zFrank
New Member Introduction
3
Aug 12, 2015 03:46 AM
surreybrad
LT1 Based Engine Tech
2
Jul 5, 2015 10:36 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 AM.