Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

Bummed about by 383 dyno performance.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-11-2008, 08:41 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
WS6T3RROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Engineerland
Posts: 1,517
Check out the map readings too that will give you an idea if its something in the motor or if something in front of the tb is causing the problem. Get your maf airflow in grams per second as well, peak number will be what to look for. I have seen enough of these run that i have an idea about what it should take to make x hp.

Off a tooth would have you 16-20 degrees advanced depending on your timing chain, I really really think you would know for certain if it was off that far. The results would be horrific. Cranking compression test would reveal this most likely.

I am guessing you are also certain that the valve springs are up to the job since both pieces are gtp stuff.

Last edited by WS6T3RROR; 09-11-2008 at 08:46 AM.
WS6T3RROR is offline  
Old 09-11-2008, 09:57 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
SS MPSTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,525
Assuming everything is right, and you haven't killed compression, that engine 'should' be capable of numbers well north of 400rwhp.
SS MPSTR is offline  
Old 09-11-2008, 10:13 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
tomcowle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: GENEVA, Ohio
Posts: 463
Take it to the track, if your AFR and timing is right who cares what the dyno says? You built it to have fun with and thats all that matters.

My neighbor has a LS1 Camaro that wheel dyno's at 400rwhp and he always bragged himself up on this number and how crazy I was to do an LT1 car. Long story short, he hasn't beat me yet and my car is just barely at 300rwhp and trust me his car has ALOT more into it than mine does, it drives him nuts.
tomcowle is offline  
Old 09-11-2008, 11:10 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
James Montigny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,444
Probably not off by a tooth, but if the cam was not degreed as part of the install, it may
very well be off +/- 6* which would cause a significant loss of power up top.
Overtightened rockers, gaskets protruding into the passages could also cause you to be down on power.

Also keep in mind that larger displacement (in this case 383) will tend to squeeze the operating RPM.
A cam designed to peak at 6200 for a 350 will peak much lower (5600ish) in a 383.

Last edited by James Montigny; 09-11-2008 at 11:18 AM.
James Montigny is offline  
Old 09-15-2008, 02:52 PM
  #20  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Balke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 18
Alright, I did a compression test and everything looked good to me. All cylinders came in between 195 and 225.

I have a call into my machine shop to verify that they degreed the cam. But I am planning on pulling the timing cover this week to take a look anyway.

I am going to attempt to put an old version of free scan on my laptop and get some map and maf readings for you guys.

Thanks for the help.
Balke is offline  
Old 09-16-2008, 09:15 AM
  #21  
Registered User
 
slomarao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,705
Take it to the track, most a4's lay down low numbers. It may run low 12's/high 11's, yougot to run it to find out tho.
slomarao is offline  
Old 09-18-2008, 07:05 AM
  #22  
Banned
 
Pontiac_97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 183
you built a crappy engine. throw it away and start over
Pontiac_97 is offline  
Old 09-28-2008, 11:32 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
94/96ZsM6s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ceresco, NE
Posts: 109
i wouldn't be too bummed, i had the same issues with my 94 camaro w/ 396. 355hp and 381tq on a dynojet. A few months later I dynoed on a mustang dyno and get 345/365. The only mods i did before the mustang dyno runs was replacing the slp loudmouth w/stainless works chambered muffler to a magnaflow catback and a cutout. I have the CC306 and it peaked at the same RPMS as yours did. The car has run strong for 15K and never skipped a beat.

my buddys 02 Z 6sp dynoed at 389 and 376 on the same dynojet dyno with only mild thrunder racing cam,CAI, longtubes, catback w/cutout and 4.10s. We raced on DR's froma roll, still beat him by a car length while not hooking up in 1st or 2nd with 315 goodyear DR's. So i knew the car was perfroming near what it should.

Even with what i thought were crappy #'s i still did 133mph in the half mile at the sandhills open road challenge, same as an 06 mustang GT with the saleen SC.

get out there and take it to the track, you won't be dissapointed!
94/96ZsM6s is offline  
Old 11-12-2008, 12:31 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
Airbornec507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 372
MAP and AFR above 5500rpms?

Originally Posted by 94/96ZsM6s
i wouldn't be too bummed, i had the same issues with my 94 camaro w/ 396. 355hp and 381tq on a dynojet. A few months later I dynoed on a mustang dyno and get 345/365. The only mods i did before the mustang dyno runs was replacing the slp loudmouth w/stainless works chambered muffler to a magnaflow catback and a cutout. I have the CC306 and it peaked at the same RPMS as yours did. The car has run strong for 15K and never skipped a beat.

my buddys 02 Z 6sp dynoed at 389 and 376 on the same dynojet dyno with only mild thrunder racing cam,CAI, longtubes, catback w/cutout and 4.10s. We raced on DR's froma roll, still beat him by a car length while not hooking up in 1st or 2nd with 315 goodyear DR's. So i knew the car was perfroming near what it should.

Even with what i thought were crappy #'s i still did 133mph in the half mile at the sandhills open road challenge, same as an 06 mustang GT with the saleen SC.

get out there and take it to the track, you won't be dissapointed!
I couldn't agree more with this statement. Once you get track times you will see were you are truly at. In my opinion dyno numbers should only be used for base runs and tune from there to get the most out of the tune. What the actual numbers are and what dyno it is really isn't worth a hill of beans to me. Course we all know what opinions are worth. Just saying (a dyno to me is for tuning not bragin).

That being said. What is your A/F above 5500rpms? My SVO #30 INJ leaned out bad after 5400 rpms. I just can't believe that those injectors would be holding you around a 13.0 +/- .2 above 5500 rpms based on my own testing on a wideband with my car that has a similar set up with less lift in the cam.

Also I agree with the MAP statement above too. See what your MAP readings are above 5500rpms. I bet somewhere BTW the MAP and AFR you’ll find your culprit. That's where my problem was when I was traping 87.5mph and am now traping 91mph consistently in the 1/8th with a few more bugs to work out in the tune and shift points(not to bad for a little of the shelf grind).

Just a word of encouragement. Take this as a hobby. The difference with folks who run great times and folks who don't regardless of the set up are the folks who run the good times have spent a lot of time figuring out and fixing the numerous little things that make that set up max out it's potential. Yes there are a few folks that get everything set up correctly the first time out and are kinda lucky if you ask me and yes some set ups just won't run but those are far and few in between. G/L and post up the answers to these questions and we'll get you on the right track.
Airbornec507 is offline  
Old 11-12-2008, 03:35 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
marshall93z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 2,640
You trapping 91 with the 306 and stock heads?
marshall93z is offline  
Old 11-12-2008, 05:36 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
Airbornec507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 372
Originally Posted by marshall93z
You trapping 91 with the 306 and stock heads?
Check the link below to keep this on track with the original question posted by the OP. I think it will answer your question sufficiently.

https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=647907
Airbornec507 is offline  
Old 11-15-2008, 10:54 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
MachinistOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,001
I think your cam is way too advanced, those compression #'s are high for a street motor.
MachinistOne is offline  
Old 11-27-2008, 03:14 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
NVetro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,439
I have the same compression, about the same heads..and a little bigger of a cam....I put down the numbers below. Did you throw a scanner on it and see whats going on? Fuel pressure ,etc... all that jazz...my first dyno on my new motor i put down 389rwhp and was pretty pissed...it ended up being it was running a bit rich and had a lot of false knock. Dig deeper, you should be 405-415 rwhp'ish
NVetro is offline  
Old 11-28-2008, 11:29 AM
  #29  
Registered User
 
95Blackhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,277
I have to agree with those saying cam timing. You never indicated it was degreed or not.
95Blackhawk is offline  
Old 12-03-2008, 06:46 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
dookie454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 573
something changes right around 280-290hp, not sure what RPM that is, both HP and Torque seem to take a hit towards the flat side. That's about all I have to say.
dookie454 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
football4life
Cars For Sale
2
10-04-2015 07:48 AM
fift5
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
11
10-01-2015 10:31 AM
Z Power
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
09-19-2015 11:19 PM
cristian1311
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
2
09-12-2015 08:16 PM
sleeperZ96BT
Parts For Sale
0
09-10-2015 08:01 AM



Quick Reply: Bummed about by 383 dyno performance.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 AM.