Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

Balancing ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2004 | 11:34 AM
  #1  
zrg91gt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 91
Balancing ?

Howdy, I am writing to verify that I havent screwed up with my balancing. I gave them a flexplate from an automatic, and I had my mahine shop balance the rotating assembly without the stock dampner, since I believe that it is nuetral on the front. My questions are:

1. I have a M6. Is the balance on the flywheel different than the automatic? Should I be concerned?

2. Should I have given them my dampner assembly? I thought LT1's were neutrally balanced in the front.


Thanks for helping!

Last edited by zrg91gt; Jun 10, 2004 at 11:54 AM.
Old Jun 10, 2004 | 01:53 PM
  #2  
irocz383's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 670
From: Surrey, B.C., Canada
your right on the neutral balanced part. They do not require the balancer if it is neutral in the front.

As for the rear... I did the same thing. Since they will be adding of removing weight from the automatic flexplate you will need to have the T56 flywheel reblanaced to match the auto flexplate.

While its back in the shop you might as well get them to resurface it too.

What you'll need to do is give them the felxplate you had the motor balanced with along with the T56 flywheel and tell them you want the flywheel balance matched to the flexplate.

It might be a good idea to keep the flexplate as a template. Just in case you get a diferant flywheel of if you need to replace the T56 one, you'll have a template to balance the new one to.
Old Jun 10, 2004 | 02:09 PM
  #3  
zrg91gt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 91
But wouldn't this be an issue with the auto-manual swap crowd? My thought is that if you can swap between an auto and a manual, the balance of the two flywheels/flexplate is exactly the same?
Old Jun 10, 2004 | 02:56 PM
  #4  
MRBIGBLOCK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 28
From: MONROE NC
SHOULD BE THE SAME. INTERNALLY BALANCED ENGINES DONT REQUIRE WEIGHT TO BE DIFFRANT.
Old Jun 10, 2004 | 04:15 PM
  #5  
irocz383's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 670
From: Surrey, B.C., Canada
I was under the same assumption.... turns out that the flexplate I bought needed to have weight removed.

when I got the T56 a lot of the weight needed to be removed. Its was far from a bolt on swap.

IT wont hurt to make sure its balanced properly. Better to do it and make sure now rather than having it all installed to find that its not balanced. Then you'll have to re and re everything again.
Old Jun 11, 2004 | 09:25 AM
  #6  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
As long as you are building a new motor, why not have it internally balanced to neutral? Than you can swap flywheels/flexplates to your heart's content, as long as they are neutral balanced. Some people think internal balance places less stress on the crank, FWIW.

Rich Krause
Old Jun 11, 2004 | 09:32 AM
  #7  
zrg91gt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 91
but what about the factory? Both the auto and m6 use the same exact engine, with the same balancing inside. What gives? Other than the obvious larger mass that the m6 flywheel posesses, shouldnt the counterweight be the same?
Old Jun 11, 2004 | 10:21 AM
  #8  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Originally posted by zrg91gt
but what about the factory? Both the auto and m6 use the same exact engine, with the same balancing inside. What gives? Other than the obvious larger mass that the m6 flywheel posesses, shouldnt the counterweight be the same?
I believe that it is. In fact, when I first swapped the T56 for a TH400 I simply swapped in a standard external balanced flexplate with no problems.

Rich
Old Jun 11, 2004 | 10:45 AM
  #9  
MRBIGBLOCK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 28
From: MONROE NC
MAYBE IM WRONG BUT ARENT ALL THESE MOTORS INTERNALY BALANCED
Old Jun 11, 2004 | 12:28 PM
  #10  
zrg91gt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 91
Nope, the LT1 motor is internally balanced on the front 1/2 (that is why the dampner has no keyed shaft to locate it), and externally balanced on the rear. Weird stuff, huh....
Old Jun 11, 2004 | 12:46 PM
  #11  
MRBIGBLOCK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 28
From: MONROE NC
I QUEES YOU LEARN SOMETHING EVERYDAY WELL I KNOW MY BIGBLOCK IS INTERNALY BALANCED
Old Jun 11, 2004 | 03:34 PM
  #12  
AdioSS's Avatar
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,371
From: Kilgore TX 75662
dude, lose the caps lock please
Old Jun 11, 2004 | 03:39 PM
  #13  
MRBIGBLOCK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 28
From: MONROE NC
Sorry about thatIim at work and all our stuff is done in caps lock. Its just habbit.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff1904
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
5
Jun 5, 2016 05:00 PM
Daluchman1974
Cars For Sale
1
Sep 11, 2015 06:12 AM
karpetcm
Parts For Sale
5
Aug 14, 2015 03:02 PM
bunker
Parts For Sale
0
Aug 1, 2015 10:10 PM
RallyRed701/2
LT1 Based Engine Tech
3
Jul 20, 2015 11:18 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 PM.