Advanced Tech Advanced tech discussion. Major rebuilds, engine theory, etc.
HIGH-END DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT FOR GENERAL TECH INFO

.609 lift with .600 lift springs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2002, 02:03 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
KCFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: KU
Posts: 557
.609 lift with .600 lift springs?

A friend of mine has a '00 TA and he is in the middle of a head and cam swap. Will he be alright for a while running a cam with .609 lift and springs that say they max out at .600?

EDIT: MTI told him they were the springs to use
KCFormula is offline  
Old 11-23-2002, 02:58 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
MW93Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: SPRINGFIELD, MO.
Posts: 10
Who's car Joe?
MW93Z28 is offline  
Old 11-23-2002, 06:00 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
KCFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: KU
Posts: 557
Mike- It's Griffins. He is getting 2.05/1.60 valves with a 7 angle valve job. I think it is overkill for a stock bottom end but he says in the not too far future he will be getting a stroker kit.
KCFormula is offline  
Old 11-23-2002, 09:45 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
gearjammer94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Somewhere, Ok.
Posts: 19
The only way to know if they will be ok is to set them up with the desired installed height, check for coil bind. You can set them up taller than the specified installed height, but you will lose some preasure at that height! New springs might be the safer choice!
Check out the link below for some info that may help you guys out.
http://www.cranecams.com/morvtfaq.htm
gearjammer94 is offline  
Old 11-23-2002, 10:42 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Stephen 87 IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500' elevation
Posts: 2,037
If the spring is installed at the recommended height then the .600" max lift means they have .060" clearance between the coils at max lift. Going to .609" lift reduces that minimum clearance of .060". Although you won't get coil bind, it's not good for the springs.

Install the spring at least +.009 higher than the recommended install height. This usually means cutting the spring pocket down, using longer valves or using special keepers (valve locks) that position the retainer higher on the valve.

The higher install height will reduce the amount of closed spring pressure and could cause valve float but I doubt .009" will make a huge difference.

Make sure the valve guides are cut down for the extra lift or the bottom of the spring retainers will hit the top of the guides.
Stephen 87 IROC is offline  
Old 11-24-2002, 01:40 AM
  #6  
Banned
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
The reduction in seated height will give you less seated pressure which as you said will not help. I think the best solution here is to go with better springs. Hell they are under $100, that's better than replacing bent valves later.

BTW what springs are they?

Bret
SStrokerAce is offline  
Old 11-24-2002, 06:44 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
KCFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: KU
Posts: 557
SSstrokerAce- they are Iskys of somesort.
KCFormula is offline  
Old 11-24-2002, 07:47 PM
  #8  
Banned
 
SStrokerAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,518
Originally posted by KCFormula
SSstrokerAce- they are Iskys of somesort.
need an exact spring. Part number would be nice.

Bret
SStrokerAce is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DirtyDaveW
Parts For Sale
1
03-15-2015 07:01 PM
MadMav
Parts For Sale
8
02-06-2015 11:02 PM
Red_94Formula
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
01-22-2015 12:17 AM



Quick Reply: .609 lift with .600 lift springs?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 PM.