Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles
View Poll Results: Which styling direction should the 6th gen Camaro take?
An evolution of the 5th gen.
58.76%
Something completely fresh.
41.24%
Voters: 97. You may not vote on this poll

6th gen Camaro styling poll.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 04:15 PM
  #31  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by JeremyNYR
SSbaby, you should review production numbers for 3rd gens. They were INCREDIBLY popular! Also I don't see how the 3rd to 4th gen transition can be seen as anything but evolutionary. the structure from the firewall back is nearly identical and just about everything swaps between them.

For the 6th gen, honestly I don't know! I can see either direction being great or a trainwreck... it all depends on what kind of emotional reaction it gives me when I see it.
Yes, I know about the sales numbers but I think Mustang's "sedan based coupe" like proportions indicate that Ford had the right formula all along.

The 4th Gen was similar to the 3rd gen in that it was a Corvette like car... which tend to have a limited lifespan.

Originally Posted by Z284ever
GM can only pray to have a Camaro which sells in the same volumes as the old 3rd gen.
Pardon me, but don't you drive the least successful Camaro model ever,which was loosely based on the 3rd Gen?

Like I keep saying, the car that appeals to you may not be the best design proposal for Camaro. A complete redesign is a huge risk on an already successful and probably iconic design.
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 04:38 PM
  #32  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by SSbaby

Pardon me, but don't you drive the least successful Camaro model ever,which was loosely based on the 3rd Gen?

Like I keep saying, the car that appeals to you may not be the best design proposal for Camaro. A complete redesign is a huge risk on an already successful and probably iconic design.

There are two Camaros currently sitting in my garage. They are more than just "loosely based on the 3rd gen" - they are 3rd gens.

The point being, I don't think GM would be too unhappy about selling 250,000 -300,000 F-cars annually again.

Whatever styling direction the the next Camaro takes - it will be a complete redesign, even if it retains some of the current car's styling elements.

Last edited by Z284ever; Feb 15, 2010 at 04:51 PM.
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 05:18 PM
  #33  
onebadponcho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 954
From: Shelton, WA
I vote for a complete refresh, both interior and exterior.

The only thing "iconic" about the current Camaro is the name.
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 06:01 PM
  #34  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by onebadponcho
I vote for a complete refresh, both interior and exterior.

The only thing "iconic" about the current Camaro is the name.
Hey let's not allow sales figures and general popularity of the 5G to cloud your judgement... I mean personal opinion far outweighs sales stats.

What was Guy saying in the other thread about the internet?

Oh yes, found it...

Internet forums are not reality.
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 06:17 PM
  #35  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by Z28x
Something fresh could turn out amazing, or absolutely horrid. It is a tough call.
Originally Posted by Z284ever
I'm still not quite sure where I'm at on this. One thing I wonder about, is what carrying forward the current car's styling themes to a smaller car might bring as far as proportions and stance. Imagine the current design, but on an architecture with a lower cowl, lower beltline, and without dependence on 729 mm diameter tires to proportion it.

Could look very agressive and fresh while retaining evolutionary styling.
Either strategy could result in something amazing or horrid. Tighten the current one up a bit while lowering the beltline, and it could be a great looking car.

Since this one has sold so well, and a lot of its appeal is its looks, it makes sense to do a variation on the current one. Though you could also argue that you don't want the current styling to get old.

Old Feb 15, 2010 | 06:33 PM
  #36  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
This is the 2010's, the market is extremely competitive with hundreds of models available. The only things that sell in the 250K-300K per year a vehicles with a lot of utility and practicality. Coupes are also not as popular as they were in the 80's. A sporty car that can sell 100K in the 2010's would be a miracle.

Any Camaro that can go neck and neck sales wise with the Mustang is a huge success.

Edit: I think a better question on which direction the Camaro should go is trunk vs. hatch.

Last edited by Z28x; Feb 15, 2010 at 06:38 PM.
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 08:14 PM
  #37  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by Z28x
This is the 2010's, the market is extremely competitive with hundreds of models available. The only things that sell in the 250K-300K per year a vehicles with a lot of utility and practicality. Coupes are also not as popular as they were in the 80's. A sporty car that can sell 100K in the 2010's would be a miracle.

Any Camaro that can go neck and neck sales wise with the Mustang is a huge success.
Sure, those kinds of numbers are probably no longer possible. I was simply countering SSbaby's assertion on the 3rd gen that "their popularity sunk to unprecedented lows".
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 09:47 PM
  #38  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by Z28x
Edit: I think a better question on which direction the Camaro should go is trunk vs. hatch.
Yeah!

I love my hatchback 4th gen, and all of the utility that layout allows.
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 09:53 PM
  #39  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Sure, those kinds of numbers are probably no longer possible. I was simply countering SSbaby's assertion on the 3rd gen that "their popularity sunk to unprecedented lows".
Actually, my assertion was that the 4th Gen (which was loosely based on the 3rd Gen) had sunk to unprecedented lows. Yes, I thought you owned a 4th Gen but I've since been corrected.
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 09:59 PM
  #40  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
Yeah!

I love my hatchback 4th gen, and all of the utility that layout allows.
Even at the expense of body rigidity?
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 10:34 PM
  #41  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by SSbaby
Actually, my assertion was that the 4th Gen (which was loosely based on the 3rd Gen) had sunk to unprecedented lows. Yes, I thought you owned a 4th Gen but I've since been corrected.

Actually, you asserted both.

Originally Posted by SSbaby
One thing the 6G Camaro shouldn't morph into is another 'Vette. I hope GM learned a valuable lesson when they produced the 3rd and 4th Gen Camaros, when their popularity sunk to unprecedented lows. If that is what people are wanting, then you are almost guaranteeing the Camaro's premature demise, IMHO.
I get it already. You think the 5th gen Camaro is absolute perfection, delivered by the hand of God himself, and no detail of it should ever be deviated from, for now and forever.
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 11:29 PM
  #42  
bkpliskin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 654
From: Snow Belt, PA
Originally Posted by Zigroid
I have always liked the concept drawings before the current camaro was unveiled.





change the front/back around a little more to look like an evolution of the current design. I like the side profile in those cars, it doesn't look HUGE and need 20" wheels to look right.

make it about 7/8ths size of the current camaro.

doesn't really matter though as I can't afford one so im not the target market
That's more of a Corvette type of car. I like it a lot, but it's not a pony car.
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 11:33 PM
  #43  
onebadponcho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 954
From: Shelton, WA
Originally Posted by SSbaby
Hey let's not allow sales figures and general popularity of the 5G to cloud your judgement... I mean personal opinion far outweighs sales stats.

What was Guy saying in the other thread about the internet?

Oh yes, found it...
https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/sho...uction+figures

So in your "reality", the 1978-1979 and 1984 Camaros were "icons", right?
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 11:53 PM
  #44  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by onebadponcho
https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/sho...uction+figures

So in your "reality", the 1978-1979 and 1984 Camaros were "icons", right?
Different era. Therefore, you cannot compare today's 5G sales with those of the past if that is your point. It's all relative. You can't claim with any certainty that the 5G isn't a sales success. Time will prove either of us right or wrong as far as this model being iconic... but you are being too quick to judge, is all I was saying.

But carry on.
Old Feb 16, 2010 | 12:04 AM
  #45  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Actually, you asserted both.
Yeah poor sentence structure but when you look at both of those models, the public had had enough of that type of car - and most low slung cars have a limited life.

Originally Posted by Z284ever
I get it already. You think the 5th gen Camaro is absolute perfection, delivered by the hand of God himself, and no detail of it should ever be deviated from, for now and forever.
No. I'm just not interested in some of the gospel bandied about by people hung out about weight and size. I do honestly believe that most people don't actually like small cars... but I digress.

In regards to the 5G, I love almost everything about this car. I'm not saying it's the best car in the world but I will say that it evokes pure emotion. My eyes pop out whenever I look at one in traffic. My pulse races. Not many GM cars stir as much emotion as this car. You know, the type of fanfare that is normally reserved for European exotics. An M3 would almost blend in with the traffic, in comparison. Just my humble opinion, of course.

Yes, I know your requirements are different but that doesn't mean the 6G will tick all your boxes either unless you base your purchasing decision purely on weight and size.

Of course you'd know that the 2nd Gen Camaro was annually the biggest selling model in its history. It was also about 500lbs heavier than the 3rd Gen. Like I said, weight and size is meaningless for some.

Btw, I just noticed you've added your own connotation to the definition of the term 'pony car' in your sig... just one important word you omited - relatively! I find that quite amusing.

Pony car is an American class of automobile launched and inspired by the Ford Mustang in 1964.[1][2] The term describes an affordable, compact, highly styled car with a sporty or performance-oriented image. "It was small by Detroit standards, with sporty styling... [a]nd the rear wheels were driven by an engine — ideally a big V8 — mounted up front..."[3] Pony cars were "relatively small, relatively light and often absurdly powerful."[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pony_car
It's all relative!

Last edited by SSbaby; Feb 16, 2010 at 03:24 AM.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 AM.