3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech 1982 - 1992 Engine Related

Spohn Torque Arm Q's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2004 | 11:10 PM
  #1  
OrangeIROC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 188
Spohn Torque Arm Q's

I am in the process of putting a new everything in my car, engine, trasmission, suspension.. The tranny is a th400 and i saw that spohn sold a th400 torque arm/crossmember for my car (88 iroc) so i ordered the Chromoly one.. On the downside i didn't do much research and didn't realsize BMR sold the Trac-Pack which i like alot, however its too late now.. Anyways my Q is how is the Spohn th400 style torque arm that i ordered?? Good Bad Ugly?? Any info is good info, thanks ahead of tiem for the replies..

The Spohn still relocated the lifting point to the crossmember rather than the transmission.. Any comments??

Thanks in advnace! Mike
Old Apr 18, 2004 | 12:22 AM
  #2  
Stephen 87 IROC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,037
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500' elevation
Nothing wrong with the Spohn torque arm however you didn't really need the chromoly version.

Having the torque arm attach to the crossmember takes the load and stress on the tailshaft housing off the tranny and moves it to the chassis.
Old Apr 18, 2004 | 07:10 PM
  #3  
LiquidSkies's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 130
From: New England
ive heard the arm makes clunking noises when the brakes are applied. im not sure if its totally true though. my whole car is BMR and i have nothing but good things to say about them. but the spohn products are nice too
Old Apr 18, 2004 | 08:32 PM
  #4  
OrangeIROC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 188
Ya i may have gone a little overkill with my chromoly parts, but i'm desparate to make this thing as light as possible, so i went for it.. And i know it is good that the torque arm relocates to the crossmember but i feel the BMR Trac-Pac is better, i wish i woulda seen it before hand, oh well too late now.. Waht did u do for a Torque arm ??

Originally posted by Stephen 87 IROC
Nothing wrong with the Spohn torque arm however you didn't really need the chromoly version.

Having the torque arm attach to the crossmember takes the load and stress on the tailshaft housing off the tranny and moves it to the chassis.
Old Apr 18, 2004 | 09:19 PM
  #5  
Stephen 87 IROC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,037
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500' elevation
I ran a Spohn torque arm for a couple of years. When I finally installed a tranny with a transbrake I also switched to a 9" diff. Instead of trying to fabricate a bracket to the 9" diff for the torque arm to attach to, I installed ladder bars instead.
Old Apr 19, 2004 | 08:52 AM
  #6  
OrangeIROC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 188
i'm buying a bolt in moser 9" pretty soon, i figured it'd have a bracket on it since its bolt in.. am i wrong? *fingers crossed*
Old Apr 19, 2004 | 11:19 AM
  #7  
Stephen 87 IROC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,037
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500' elevation
A "bolt-in" housing has all the mounts to attach the factory suspension components. That's why it's called a bolt-in.

That's also why you can't just go and find a junkyard 9" or 12 bolt and install it. All the other brackets can easily be moved over however there's no easy way to attach the torque arm.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Stephen68
Parts Wanted
2
Sep 27, 2015 06:42 PM
autoxr166
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
0
Sep 25, 2015 04:21 PM
Jake Bialke
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
0
Sep 24, 2015 11:31 AM
MDZ28
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
11
Sep 24, 2015 09:15 AM
Bxlt1
Drivetrain
8
Sep 17, 2015 08:31 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 PM.