3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech 1982 - 1992 Engine Related

The real "Fast and the Furious" F-Body's/How fast are y'all's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 28, 2003 | 06:31 PM
  #1  
305man's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 67
From: Dallas
The real "Fast and the Furious" F-Body's/How fast are y'all's?

I'm at work bored and decided to start a new post. Hopefully y'all will fill this thread up. My car is stock so we're not even going into that one till I get mods but anyway, I just wanted to see out of the 3rd gens whose got some of the fastest ones on this board (relative to engine size etc.)?

Last edited by 305man; Jan 28, 2003 at 06:51 PM.
Old Jan 28, 2003 | 09:20 PM
  #2  
jd13's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 479
From: Clearwater, Florida
Time and mods in sig.
Old Jan 28, 2003 | 09:44 PM
  #3  
Narcah's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 74
From: Oroville, Ca
14.54x in a practically stock 89 Iroc 5.7.
Old Jan 28, 2003 | 09:52 PM
  #4  
ws6transam's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 2,161
From: Haslett, Michigan
14.04 @ 100.8 MPH in a feeble, 18 year old, 136,000 mile carburated 305. No nitrous, just clean air, exhaust system, and stock heads that I ported myself.

I even got it on video at the CamaroZ28.com M5 event at the Stanton event, then backed it up with two additional runs at 100.7 MPH.
Old Jan 28, 2003 | 10:33 PM
  #5  
305man's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 67
From: Dallas
Nice. Keep those replies comin'. I'm gonna go a little off topic here and say that I know I'm nowhere near any of y'alls level of power, even in my stock 91 RS (tbi of course) with the pathetic stock hp I still have the torque to finish off at least these crap ricers around here. You know who I'm talkin' about! Those idiots who know nothing about cars but watched Fast and the Furious and think that K&N, stickers, and a "trash can" on the back of their Honda (doesn't matter what year) will beat F-Body power. Even with the measly hp on my RS the 255 lb/ft of stock torque is more than enough to give them a reality check on their car. Honestly I don't think any of these guys even know what torque is! Mine is probably the lowest powered stock V8 GM has made and I kick their butts, w/ their manual tranny and mods, so I wonder what they're thinking when they come up against some of y'all! Just a random thought! Anyway keep the replies on your cars comin'!

Last edited by 305man; Jan 28, 2003 at 10:42 PM.
Old Jan 28, 2003 | 10:36 PM
  #6  
Irocvette355's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 119
From: Falls Church, VA
In the Sig
Old Jan 28, 2003 | 10:38 PM
  #7  
91 Redd Sledd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 824
From: St.Johns MI
WS6Tranam,

I envy you. The best I could get with my 305 was a 14.4 at 99mph.I just could'nt get it into the triple didgets. I still think my time is respectable for a Haevy *** Convertible and a 305 A4.I think with a stall and a cam I should be in the high 13's.At least thats what I am hoping for.Mods are in sig for both cars I own now. I know the brand X cars times ar'nt impressive but I am working on that.That ran a 14.3 with a 150 shot.


James
Old Jan 28, 2003 | 11:33 PM
  #8  
AutoRoc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 2,342
From: MI
nhghgmnhg

13.30's at 105 from a 305 engine with a carb/intake/headers/100 shot

It now has a 150 shot and proper timing...12's NO PROBLEM come spring time!
Old Jan 28, 2003 | 11:36 PM
  #9  
91 Redd Sledd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 824
From: St.Johns MI
Damn You too Denny
Old Jan 29, 2003 | 12:08 AM
  #10  
Osmosis's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 218
From: Seattle
12.06 @v 109mph
Old Jan 29, 2003 | 01:27 AM
  #11  
305man's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 67
From: Dallas
Osmosis, what size engine are you running in that car?
Old Jan 29, 2003 | 01:46 AM
  #12  
Error404's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 236
From: Los Angeles, CA
The guy I purchased my car from claims that he ran mid 13's in it. But I don't know for sure, nor do I plan on draging much to find out. ... at least for now anyway
Old Jan 29, 2003 | 01:58 AM
  #13  
kandied91z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,978
From: MI
18.69 @ 127

changed my K&N's to the new cool blue accel filters.
Old Jan 29, 2003 | 06:26 AM
  #14  
dewey316's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 71
From: Portland, OR
Originally posted by kandied91z
18.69 @ 127
something isn't adding up there
Old Jan 29, 2003 | 10:24 AM
  #15  
OrangeIROC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 188
Gunning for high 11's low 12's with the new combo

LT1, M6, 12-bolt w/ 4:11's, LT4 Hot Cam



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33 AM.