3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech 1982 - 1992 Engine Related

new rotating assembly??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2004, 08:48 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
CamaroStylin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 151
new rotating assembly??

ok so im building this high performance TPI 350 for my 88 camaro and I know i need new pistons, so im going with forged TRW flat tops. I'll be running 10.5:1 compression and I'll be pulling 490 ft/lbs of torque and 499 hp. i guess i need to replace the rods as well, huh?
if so, do i need H beam or should I beam be ok? what's the limit for each?
Do i need a new crank? im really hoping i dont, but if you guys think its a possibility, please tell me.
thanks guys!
CamaroStylin is offline  
Old 05-14-2004, 10:13 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
TheGreatJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: T-town
Posts: 1,677
You don't need H-beam rods. I-beams will be more than sufficient. The stock nodular iron crank should be fine too, as long as you don't plan on ever going to a forced induction or spray setup. Make sure to get the rotating assembly balanced....that'll play a big role in it's durability.
TheGreatJ is offline  
Old 05-14-2004, 11:52 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Black6SpdTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 2,043
What RPM does the motor make peak power at? If it's higher than ~5k, and the crank has a lot of miles on it, I'd consider going forged. Then you're totally safe down the road.
Black6SpdTA is offline  
Old 05-15-2004, 02:34 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
CamaroStylin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 151
peak horsepower at 6k and peak torque at 4500.
i dont have the engine yet, so im not sure what kind of wear is on the crank
how much power do you think I beams can take??
CamaroStylin is offline  
Old 05-15-2004, 09:47 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
aklim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,249
Why do you want such high compression? I have that and regret it. If I had known then what I know now I would have spent the money on a Callies forged rotating assembly and had about 8.5 compression. That way when I wanted more power later on, I could install a supercharger.
aklim is offline  
Old 05-16-2004, 01:09 AM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
CamaroStylin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 151
why such high compression? because if im goign to build an engine and spend all that time and money (neither of which i have much of) then it's going to be done right and its going to be powerful enough to make it worth while. if i could run higher compression on pump gas then i would. you have to do everything you can to get more power out of a performance engine, and as everyone knows higher compression equals more power. what kind of compression do you have? why do you regret it?
i would never build an engine with 8.5:1 unless I specifically intended to run boost on it. Im not going to put a supercharger on a daily driver. it's just not logical. especially if i can get 500hp out of it anyway.
would you disagree?
CamaroStylin is offline  
Old 05-16-2004, 01:14 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
97WS6SCharged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 4,784
I seriously doubt you're going to see 499 hp out of a TPI type motor, but I wish you luck. As far as compression, I'd look to run about 10:1 on a gen 1 street engine. That should be plenty.
97WS6SCharged is offline  
Old 05-16-2004, 03:04 AM
  #8  
Banned
 
aklim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,249
Originally posted by CamaroStylin
why such high compression? because if im goign to build an engine and spend all that time and money (neither of which i have much of) then it's going to be done right and its going to be powerful enough to make it worth while. if i could run higher compression on pump gas then i would. you have to do everything you can to get more power out of a performance engine, and as everyone knows higher compression equals more power. what kind of compression do you have? why do you regret it?
i would never build an engine with 8.5:1 unless I specifically intended to run boost on it. Im not going to put a supercharger on a daily driver. it's just not logical. especially if i can get 500hp out of it anyway.
would you disagree?
Currently I have 10.8:1. I regret it because I am way too high to supercharge it.

I would think that at 8.5:1, you could make it work because you can run more timing without risk of detonation to make up for the loss of power with the low compression. I have seen a 306 (bored .030 over) Mustang with a supercharger that makes 560 ft/lbs of torque at the wheels that is a daily driver. To get 500 out of a 350 and have streetability will be difficult. You'd have to sacrifice some idle quality and some gas mileage.
aklim is offline  
Old 05-16-2004, 04:05 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
97WS6SCharged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 4,784
Lots of boost on that 306 to make that much torque at the wheels.

Why is it illogical to put a supercharger on a daily driven car? With a supercharger you can get decent gas mileage, a nice idle, power brakes, and stupid amounts of power and torque.
97WS6SCharged is offline  
Old 05-16-2004, 12:06 PM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
CamaroStylin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 151
I wouldnt put a supercharger on a daily driven 350 because first off, it's too much power for a daily driver. if i can get 499 hp without a supercharger, then i'll do it in a heartbeat. even at tha tkind of power i wont be able to keep the tires on the road. plus, i like a rough idle in a car. lets you know its ready to eat up some hondas im looking forward to it.

and its not going to be a stock GM TPI intake system. Im using a Holley Stealth Ram system so i can actually get some power in the top end (notice that the peak HP is at 6k and peak TQ is at 4500 instead of like 2500.)

i dont even really see how you can expect good gas mileage in any driving condition when you combine 355 cubic inches and 7 pounds of boost. that basically makes the engine run (and consume fuel) as if it were a 525 ci. that's just too much for a car that i drive 25k miles a year.

plus a supercharger is expensive! I read up on all the info for the vortech third gen supercharger and it only increased power by 35% at best. not worth it in my opinion. I'd be happy sitting at 499hp-i dont need anything else
CamaroStylin is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
9t4lt4z28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
10-02-2015 10:28 AM
Z Power
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
09-19-2015 11:19 PM
cmsmith
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
08-27-2015 06:37 PM
Str8hp
Parts Wanted
0
08-25-2015 06:03 PM
Dams76
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
08-20-2015 08:28 AM



Quick Reply: new rotating assembly??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 AM.