3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech 1982 - 1992 Engine Related

LT-1 CAM in into LB9?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 4, 2004 | 01:26 AM
  #1  
Kuruption562's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 281
From: SouthSideCali
LT-1 CAM in into LB9?

Hey whats happnen yall, quik lil question, someone is sellin me an LT-1 cam for $80. Juss wonderin if it would fit in my 305 LB9? Thanks. And What kind of power would i see from this (hp gain?)

Last edited by Kuruption562; Feb 4, 2004 at 02:06 AM.
Old Feb 4, 2004 | 02:27 AM
  #2  
quickchicken's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 381
From: Byhalia Ms, just south of Memphis
from what im told that would be a decent cam to go with. i would get matching springs if i were you. if im correct thats a roller cam so your motor needs to be sett up for roller lifters as well. being 86 yours insnt a roller motor, they started in 87 IIRC.
Old Feb 4, 2004 | 11:36 AM
  #3  
chevyman502bb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 489
From: Stanley Va
80 bux? u got hosed
Old Feb 4, 2004 | 12:25 PM
  #4  
quickchicken's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 381
From: Byhalia Ms, just south of Memphis
if i were you i would decline the sale. i learned one thing a long timeago about cams. a friend said once "cams are cheap, dont take a risk. buy a new one." i had pitch a lifter when my # 7 exaust spring took a dump. we didnt know what unseen damage occured so we just replaced it.
do your homework on how you drive your car and what you plan to do with your car. call comp cams tech line and ask for Eric. hes a good friend and knows his stuff. hes going to ask you the same thing i told you and he will be better able to help ya with a cam selection. bigger aint always better.
Old Feb 4, 2004 | 12:53 PM
  #5  
95redvert's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 133
That's some good advice from quick. Bigger isn't always better.
Old Feb 4, 2004 | 01:05 PM
  #6  
chevyman502bb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 489
From: Stanley Va
from what i hea the LT1 cam isnt THAT agresive, but an all around great upgrade for a street cam, if ur gunna pay 80 for a used one u might as well get a new one, maybe the whole cam and lifter set as well if ur gunna pay that much.....ive seen used lt1 cams go for like 30 bux
Old Feb 4, 2004 | 01:14 PM
  #7  
quickchicken's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 381
From: Byhalia Ms, just south of Memphis
something else thats takeing him out of the running is he has a 86 block. the LT1 can is a roller cam and he has a flat tappet setup.
if the LT cam eas fglat tappet that would probably be a good cam to go with as is not to bumpy. the ECM can handle that without chip tuning. i considerd an LT1 myself till i bought a friends low low mile motor that was well built with a sizeable cam.
Old Feb 4, 2004 | 07:13 PM
  #8  
Black6SpdTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,043
From: Mooresville, NC
Kurupt,
Converting to roller is mad expensive. If you're going to though, I'll give you my L98 cam (real close to LT1 specs) for $25+shipping. Don't pay $80. I can't stand to see a friend get screwed like that! I'd look around for a flat tappet cam though, just because converting involves new special lifters, etc.

-Corey
Old Feb 4, 2004 | 10:06 PM
  #9  
97WS6SCharged's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,784
From: Jacksonville
Roller cams wear much better than a flat tappet cam. Since the lifters are in constant contact with the cam and they roll across the lobes, cam wear isn't that big of a deal in these cams. I've got an LT1 cam that came out of a motor with unknown miles that looks brand new (i know it isn't though). I would not hesitate to reuse it if I was doing a stock rebuild.
Old Feb 5, 2004 | 09:00 PM
  #10  
96LT14u2Nv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 980
From: batavia, ohio
ditto on what everyone else said on the LT1 cam (price). u are getting screwed for $80. that is insane!!!!! if u want one i have one for $25 shipped. but as everyone said b4, it is a roller cam and u dont have a roller block. FYI
Old Feb 5, 2004 | 11:17 PM
  #11  
stanghunter211's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 769
From: San Francisco, California United States
The 86 tpi cam was the worst ever. I would say though if you are gonna go through the trouble of a cam swap, get something a little more worth your while. There are a ton to chose from

Will
Old Feb 6, 2004 | 07:35 AM
  #12  
Black6SpdTA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,043
From: Mooresville, NC
Originally posted by stanghunter211
The 86 tpi cam was the worst ever
Try the LO3 cam. I think duration runs around 19X* and lift around .300". Pitiful, just pitiful.

Either way though, Kurupt-If I were you, I'd either look for a roller 350 block , or just find a flap tappet cam.
Old Feb 6, 2004 | 08:17 AM
  #13  
onefastgta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 366
From: Jax, FL
Why do you guys want to put stock cams back in your motors? Find a used aftermarket cam. Why go through the effort of swapping cams to only put a stocker back in there? I think there is a crane 214-220 .452 .465 roller in the classifieds at thirdgen.org, that would be a better cam than the stock LT1 anyway.

A convertor, headers, and/or used aftermarket runners would be a better mod if you don't already have them. $.02
Old Feb 6, 2004 | 02:04 PM
  #14  
Ray86IROC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 642
From: Atlanta, Ga
Summit sells a non-roller cam that will be perfect and for under $100. It specs out at 204/214 dur@.050, lift of .420"/.442. I run that in my 86 IROC's 305 TPI and it is a great upgrade from the peanut cam, yet works with the stock springs (assuming they aren't shot) and computer setup, no driveability problems. It's perfect for a mild 305. If you're doing heads/intake upgrades you can go bigger, but this one is great for a bolt on motor where you just want to ditch the worthless peanut...
Old Feb 7, 2004 | 01:51 AM
  #15  
stanghunter211's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 769
From: San Francisco, California United States
I was refering to the worst TPI cam, The 85 had 215 horse to the 86's 190,due to the cam change. But yes the LO3 would have to be the worst GM cam made...

Will



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 PM.