3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech 1982 - 1992 Engine Related

LCA relocation?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 11, 2004 | 10:31 PM
  #1  
bmillington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 179
From: Raleigh, NC
LCA relocation?

I've seen rear lower control arm relocation brackets but, how does lowering the angle help traction. It looks like it would make it squat more. Wouldn't you want to raise the front of the LCA's so the rear end pushed up on the car more than down?

How much do they help if you have aftermarket springs?
Old Jan 12, 2004 | 08:12 AM
  #2  
blackztpi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,810
From: Indiana
well, the front of the lca's are up higher than the lower. lca relocation brachtes just extend the back down. i guess for better bite. I don't know the scientific explanation for it though. how much does it help if u have aftermarket springs?? do also depends what kinda springs u want. lca relocation's are usually going to be used i drag racing. you're gonna want drag springs or i launch on eibach sport. hooksa well. springs wont really effect the use of the lca's. springs just help themselves
Old Jan 12, 2004 | 11:55 AM
  #3  
Zepher's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,880
From: Norfolk, VA. USA
When the car is lowered with springs, it changes the angle of the LCA's causing more wheel spin and/or wheel hop.
Adding the Relocation brackets move the LCA's back the normal location.

I've used them on both lowered and non-lowered cars and it made a vast improvement with traction.

If you get them, go with the weld in ones.
Old Jan 12, 2004 | 12:21 PM
  #4  
formularpm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 87
From: Southwest Iowa
My relocators made no difference, still 2.4s 60fts.
Old Jan 12, 2004 | 12:35 PM
  #5  
Zepher's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,880
From: Norfolk, VA. USA
Originally posted by formularpm
My relocators made no difference, still 2.4s 60fts.
How are your tires and the rest of your suspension?
Old Jan 12, 2004 | 03:09 PM
  #6  
formularpm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 87
From: Southwest Iowa
Eibach pro-kit, custom tubular LCAs and panhard rod, polyurethane bushings, use 255/50/16s @ 30psi at the strip. The car is set up more for cornering than drag, but it still should hook better than it does, especially with the old setup, which was basically stock. This pretty much leads me to believe the torque arm is the weak link, pretty much everything else has been done.
Old Jan 12, 2004 | 06:44 PM
  #7  
Zepher's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,880
From: Norfolk, VA. USA
I don't know what it could be. I have to try really hard to get a 2.4 60' time.

Are you just spinning through 1st?

I average 2.0-2.2 with street tires on almost every car I've driven at the track.
Old Jan 12, 2004 | 07:10 PM
  #8  
Aaron91RS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 162
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally posted by formularpm
This pretty much leads me to believe the torque arm is the weak link, pretty much everything else has been done.
Get the pinion angle you want and weld the LCA's to the axle. It can still pivot on the frame so the axle goes up and down. but now you don't need a torque arm and if you have one it is less stressed.
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 08:41 AM
  #9  
formularpm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 87
From: Southwest Iowa
Are you just spinning through 1st?
Yeah, first, then enough of a scratch into second to make it bog.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RUENUF
Cars For Sale
6
Mar 13, 2016 03:37 PM
Henson071
Parts For Sale
8
Dec 30, 2015 09:55 PM
Henson071
Parts For Sale
2
Sep 18, 2015 04:01 PM
realistyc
Cars For Sale
4
Jul 28, 2015 07:32 PM
Boss002
Autocross and Road Racing Technique
2
Jul 24, 2015 10:47 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 AM.