3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech 1982 - 1992 Engine Related

L98

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 06:36 PM
  #1  
85 IROC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 12
L98

Was the L98 the standard 350 V8 that was put in the 3rd gens?
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 06:53 PM
  #2  
x-40oz-x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 19
From: Canada
Re: L98

I don't think so because wouldn't the carb'd 350 be the standard. I've seen alot more L98's than i have just a stock carburated 350's in third gens.
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 06:57 PM
  #3  
85 IROC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 12
Re: L98

No the standard was a TPI motor. The reason I ask is that I am going to be buying an 85 IROC from a person and they said that the odometer says 109,000 something miles, but the motor was replaced with a 1990 LT1. Well there was no LT1 motor in 1990 so I am trying to decide wether or not the L98 that is in the car now is the origional motor. I have a picture of the motor.

Old Nov 22, 2005 | 08:08 PM
  #4  
87DJP2001's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,790
From: Florida. USA
Re: L98

Buying a 85 IROC and the sellers trying to give you BS about the motor. The picture looks like the 305 TPI that was the option in a 85 IROC. Check the vin and the eigth letter will be a "F". My opinion is run away from this seller as fast as you can and DON'T look back.
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 09:12 PM
  #5  
91-Z28-L98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 320
From: Tampa, FL
Re: L98

From the looks of things, that engine is crap. It has rust all over the place and the radiator and coolant reservoir show signs of leakage. The AC reciever/dryer looks bent all to hell so I doubt the AC works. It is pretty much guaranteed to be a 305. Definately not an LT1.
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 09:14 PM
  #6  
IrocManiac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,208
From: Tulsa
Re: L98

1987 was the first year the 350 was offered to the public. They built about 50 or so in 1986. These were for testing purposes. There was only one 350 offered in 3rd gens and it was the L98. This didn't happen as stated till 1987. This seller is probably full of **** and that motor looks to be pretty iffy, there's a lot of rust under that hood.
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 09:23 PM
  #7  
dcrews's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 53
From: Springfield, MO
Re: L98

it's also perimeter bolt valve covers. All l98's were center bold.. so I'm gonna have to raise the big BS flag.
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 09:50 PM
  #8  
IrocManiac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,208
From: Tulsa
Re: L98

Originally Posted by dcrews
it's also perimeter bolt valve covers. All l98's were center bold.. so I'm gonna have to raise the big BS flag.
Didnt' know that
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 10:41 PM
  #9  
dcrews's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 53
From: Springfield, MO
Re: L98

plus it's the old-style MAF sensor, so it still has the 85 harness and computer in it, which will not run an L98. (I know, it technically COULD but there would be a LOT of work and hacking involved.. just for the sake of the current topic, let's just say it can't)
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 10:45 PM
  #10  
91Z-28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 685
From: Bakersfield
Re: L98

Originally Posted by x-40oz-x
I don't think so because wouldn't the carb'd 350 be the standard. I've seen alot more L98's than i have just a stock carburated 350's in third gens.
There was never a carbed 350 in a thirdgen, just carbed 305s. The RPO LG4 was the base 305 4bbl and the L69 was the "HO" version.
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 12:30 AM
  #11  
85 IROC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 12
Re: L98

Ok thanks for the information. Now that I won't be buying this car, does anyone know of a good place to look for an IROC in Central IL?
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 12:37 AM
  #12  
85 IROC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 12
Re: L98

Well now I'm in a fix I have two places (both of witch I would consider reliable) saying two different things. This is saying it's not and http://musclecarclub.com/boards/showthread.php?t=772 is saying it is.
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 02:05 AM
  #13  
LaxStreetRacer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 13
Re: L98

The guy in the other thread doesn't explain why he thinks its an L98, and you cant tell the L98 from a 305 just by looking at them. If it was a 90 L98 it WOULD have centerbolt valvecovers, that engine does not.
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 05:15 AM
  #14  
Dave89IROC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,676
From: Melvindale, MI, US
Re: L98

get the casting number off the block, it is behind the drivers side head, it might be possible to see the stamping as well, it is on a flat pad on the passenger front, between the water pump and head, but may be covered by the alt. bracket
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 06:29 AM
  #15  
91-Z28-L98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 320
From: Tampa, FL
Re: L98

I would advise you to do your own research if you are unsure who to trust. All the information you need can be found using google searches alone.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:33 AM.