3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech 1982 - 1992 Engine Related

Chilton or Haynes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 03:48 PM
  #1  
swissiroc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 60
From: switzerland
Question Chilton or Haynes

Which manual would you recommend ?
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 04:43 PM
  #2  
90rocz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,947
From: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
Re: Chilton or Haynes

Chilton hands down!...I've been working on cars for over 25 years..
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 01:02 AM
  #3  
2000GTP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,312
From: Aurora, IL
Re: Chilton or Haynes

I owned both manuals for my third-gen firebird and I felt the Chilton was by far the most accurate and detailed.
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 08:28 AM
  #4  
respectirocz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 927
From: Queens, New York City
Re: Chilton or Haynes

i own both, i bought the chiltons and got the haynes for free

at first i liked the chiltons over the haynes
but now i'm neutral, i like both equally, they have their ups and downs

i like the chiltons pictures and step by step instructions for everything while the haynes only has it for like drum brakes and stuff

but i like the little troubleshooting section in the haynes

i dont remember which one has better wiring diagrams

i feel that when they cost about 16 bucks each, just get both
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 08:54 AM
  #5  
Demus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 261
Re: Chilton or Haynes

I have both as well and would recommend either one. To be perfectly honest, it's pretty rare I read it anymore though, most guides on the internet are 10 times better than any guide they have in the book.
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 09:31 AM
  #6  
92blue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 44
From: Miami, Fl
Re: Chilton or Haynes

Chilton's is notorious for inaccurate information. One guy on Thirdgen.org screwed up his new cam, lifters, and starter after following their valve lash adjusting procedure exactly. Turns out they had written to turn the rocker 2 1/2 times instead of 1/2 turn. I have found numerous mistakes in their wiring diagrams as well. To be perfectly honest, I don't care much for it. ITs not very specific or detailed with respect to our cars.

As far as Haynes.... I only use it to put between the jack and the transmission pan when I need to raise it. That way you don't dent the pan.

If you are at all serious about working on your car, you need a GM service manual. Its a huge book, and covers only one model year. They are expensive, but once you try it, everything else will look like garbage.
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 11:13 AM
  #7  
swisscheese's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 153
From: somewhere over the pond
Re: Chilton or Haynes

Originally Posted by 92blue
If you are at all serious about working on your car, you need a GM service manual. Its a huge book, and covers only one model year. They are expensive, but once you try it, everything else will look like garbage.

Where can I get one and how expensive is it?

Thanks
Pat
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 03:58 PM
  #8  
Ben91RS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 139
From: Greenville, SC
Re: Chilton or Haynes

Originally Posted by swisscheese
Where can I get one and how expensive is it?

Thanks
Pat
www.helminc.com

They have sales every now and then. Once you get a factory service manual, you'll never know how you went so long without one. I have all 3 for my Camaro, a Haynes, Chiltons, and a service manual, and I use all 3 of them constantly. Most of time the service manual is all I need, though.
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 04:02 PM
  #9  
fratsit's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 78
From: Newport News, Va.
Re: Chilton or Haynes

You can also get a factory service manual on EBAY for pennies on the dollar. Stay the heck away fram Haynes and Chilton's......there crap.

Frat
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 09:31 PM
  #10  
quickchicken's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 381
From: Byhalia Ms, just south of Memphis
Re: Chilton or Haynes

neither, go to ebay and get a helm manual for your year and model. i even bought a helm set for my 86 S-10.
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 10:06 PM
  #11  
90rocz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,947
From: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
Re: Chilton or Haynes

I have the Chilton 1982-92 Camaro repair manual right in front of me. It's over 2 1/2" thick. And it says 1 1/2 turns after "0" lash, that's what I've always used and have built some 400hp+ motors, all worked fine..
I've used the wiring diagrams too, , never had a problem...

Haynes does have a decent troubleshooting guide in the front, kinda a quick reference. But the jack use is a good one!!

(btw, I have a factory manual as well, hard to find things in there, but very complete. I use it only for tough problems..
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 02:09 AM
  #12  
swissiroc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 60
From: switzerland
Re: Chilton or Haynes

I got them both finally and swisscheese is a friend of mine, so we are trying to get a factory manual too.

Thanx for giving advice
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 06:05 AM
  #13  
Demus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 261
Re: Chilton or Haynes

Originally Posted by 90rocz
I have the Chilton 1982-92 Camaro repair manual right in front of me. It's over 2 1/2" thick. And it says 1 1/2 turns after "0" lash, that's what I've always used and have built some 400hp+ motors, all worked fine..
What preload to use depends on what kind of lifters you're using and what kind of cam you're using. If you're going with a bigger cam than stock, but using stock lifters, I would not go over 1/2-3/4" of a turn from zero lash. [/hijack]
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 10:51 PM
  #14  
90rocz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,947
From: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
Re: Chilton or Haynes

What preload to use depends on what kind of lifters you're using and what kind of cam you're using. If you're going with a bigger cam than stock, but using stock lifters, I would not go over 1/2-3/4" of a turn from zero lash. [/hijack]
If you mean stock roller lifters, I always have went 1 full turn, and never had a problem, but you do have to be careful not to bind a lifter in this situation, not fun to bend a pushrod...
Old Sep 25, 2005 | 08:09 PM
  #15  
92blue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 44
From: Miami, Fl
Re: Chilton or Haynes

As far as where to get a service manual, HelmInc.com carries them. They vary in price depending on the year, some get as high as $135 ( I think the 95 manual is at this price now). I carry them in my store... www.tpiparts.net for $75 each, but I don't have the wide range of years that Helm has.

I have the Chilton 1982-92 Camaro repair manual right in front of me. It's over 2 1/2" thick. And it says 1 1/2 turns after "0" lash, that's what I've always used and have built some 400hp+ motors, all worked fine..
I am fairly certain that Chilton ended up correcting the mistake on the valve lash. Several people that I have heard from had a manual which called for 2 1/2 turns after 0 lash. Even for a stock cam though, 1 1/2 turns is too much. GM set them to a full turn to keep from needing any adjustments for a long time. Most engine builders use between 1/2 to 3/4 turn. Some racers like to stay under the 1/2 turn, but that requires adjustments more often.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41 AM.