3rd Gen / L98 Engine Tech 1982 - 1992 Engine Related

9" Borg Warner on stock 88 IROC-Z?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2002, 09:45 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
88 427 Camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: MN, USA
Posts: 58
I get many inquires about 9 bolt parts and my reply to Alkim's email (posted above by Alkim) represents a majority of them.

Yes, a 9 bolt is stronger than a 10 bolt.
Yes, a 9 inch is stronger than 9 bolt.
Yes, a 9 bolt is more expensive than a 10 bolt.
Yes, a 9 inch is more expensive than a 9 bolt.

Don't forget about a drive shaft, drive shaft length, u joints, brakes, brake lines, ..... when looking at a cost comparison.

I believe (and market) the 9 bolt as an intermediate level solution (both in terms of cost and strength (fyi - book mark this post and come back one year from now and read this again )). I have been running my 9 bolt (completely stock) for over 4 years now behind my 500hp/520lbft big block (1.72-1.75 60 fts) with no problems.

My business site has more information on the 9 bolt ( www.diffsolutions.com or www.9bolt.com ). My personal site at www.koolmeister.com has more information on my car.

We are also developing components for other differentials as well (hence the new name of Diff Solutions vs 9 Bolt).


Hope this helps,
Miles
Diff Solutions
www.9bolt.com

Last edited by 88 427 Camaro; 09-17-2002 at 09:49 PM.
88 427 Camaro is offline  
Old 09-17-2002, 09:54 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
Rage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Baytown Tx, Home of HRP
Posts: 465
Yeah, hi. I have the 9 bolt. I also have a pair of Nitto's that I was scared to use in fear of breaking the rear. But by what y'all are saying I should have absolutely no doubt in my mind that it would be fine to run them. Right? Thanx for the info.
Rage is offline  
Old 09-18-2002, 05:04 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
KeithO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 537
Rage -

You sig only mentions the flowmaster as your mods. flowmaster + nittos = no problem for a 9-bolt. You have quite a bit of room for more mods too.
KeithO is offline  
Old 09-18-2002, 08:37 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
rickyzZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New Phila, OH
Posts: 357
Originally posted by KeithO
In 1988, the 9-bolt was only available with a 2.77 or 3.27. If you go over to www.9bolt.com you can read an article on the strength of these units...

BTW - I have a 2.77 posi for sale on this site.
You could also get 3.45 gears on a G92 305 TPI 5 speed car in 88. I know because I have one.


And Black Sunshine/ 00SS the brakes would bolt up just fine, but wheel spacers would be needed to run it on your 4th gen.
rickyzZ28 is offline  
Old 09-18-2002, 08:54 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
KeithO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 537
That is correct. My statement is only true for L98's. Sorry for the mis-information.
KeithO is offline  
Old 09-18-2002, 09:03 AM
  #21  
Registered User
 
IZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: At car shows and cruise nights!
Posts: 3,647
Just wanna correct something, no 3.70 gear was offered in the Third Gen. I recall the poster not being sure.
IZ28 is offline  
Old 09-19-2002, 01:18 AM
  #22  
3rd Gen Tech Moderator
 
Kevin91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 780
Originally posted by IZ28
Just wanna correct something, no 3.70 gear was offered in the Third Gen. I recall the poster not being sure.
Yes, it was. The 85 Trans Am with the L69 engine, 5-speed, and G92 option came with a 3.70 9-bolt rear end. The 86 Trans Am with the same options might have it, as well.
Kevin91Z is offline  
Old 09-19-2002, 06:11 AM
  #23  
Registered User
 
KeithO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 537
If the statement regarding the 3.70 is true, then this table needs updated:

http://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/tech/techdb.shtml

The guys over a third gen will need more than someone's word on this. They will likely want the VIN, RPO's for the car and probably a picture of the stamp on the ring gear (which indicates the ratio).
KeithO is offline  
Old 09-19-2002, 10:49 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
IZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: At car shows and cruise nights!
Posts: 3,647
I haven't seen anything ever saying there was a 3.70 gear in a Third Gen. You're gonna have to say where you're getting that from.
IZ28 is offline  
Old 09-19-2002, 11:50 PM
  #25  
3rd Gen Tech Moderator
 
Kevin91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 780
Check the History board or the General board at http://www.thirdgen.org/ There are people there who claim to own cars with stock 3.70 rear ends.
Kevin91Z is offline  
Old 09-20-2002, 05:34 AM
  #26  
Registered User
 
IZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: At car shows and cruise nights!
Posts: 3,647
I don't think they are right.

91Z, you switched to 3.70's?? I thought the best all around gear for TPI was 3.42's. Do you like them??
IZ28 is offline  
Old 09-20-2002, 08:44 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
Willie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Tucson, Arizona USA
Posts: 312
I cannot speak about Firebirds as I only know Camaros. The fact is the 9-bolt was used in the following regular production applications:

1987
3.45: 305 TPI w/5-speed and G92
3.27: 350 TPI
Note: G92 was NOT an option on the 1987 350.

1988 - 1990
3.45: 305 TPI w/5-speed and G92
2.77: 350 TPI
3.27: 350 TPI w/G92

People say the 9-bolt is stronger than the 10-bolt. I know this was GM's thought when they introduced it. What I can't help but wonder is why GM discontinued it in 1990, even as power increased year by year. And why isn't it used exclusively on fourth gen LT1/LS1's if it's stronger than the 10-bolt? Does anyone know?
Willie is offline  
Old 09-20-2002, 09:07 AM
  #28  
Registered User
 
RobsWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 467
Originally posted by Kevin91Z
Yes, it was. The 85 Trans Am with the L69 engine, 5-speed, and G92 option came with a 3.70 9-bolt rear end. The 86 Trans Am with the same options might have it, as well.
Back when I had my 84 Z28 HO 5spd/3.73 rear. My neighbor had bought a 85 HO 5spd and his came with the 3.70 9 bolt.

I went through hell trying to say that to the f-body list back in 96 or so. Nobody believed me and said it was a 10 bolt. I think I know how to count, at least up to 10
RobsWS6 is offline  
Old 09-20-2002, 09:07 AM
  #29  
Registered User
 
KeithO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 537
I cannot confirm this. However, I have been told that the 9-bolt was phased out due to the cost that they added to the price of the car. It is my understanding that the 10-bolt was beefed up (splines, maybe) in around 1990 to allow GM to eliminate the 9-bolt.

This is what I have been told.
KeithO is offline  
Old 09-20-2002, 09:09 AM
  #30  
Registered User
 
RobsWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 467
The 9 bolt is a lot stronger than the 10 bolt. I don't think a 10 bolt would've held up to the 1.6 launches I was doing with my car. Not a hint of anything wrong back there.

Of course that was with the stock setup. Now that I have a bigger stall, I can't get better than 1.8
RobsWS6 is offline  


Quick Reply: 9" Borg Warner on stock 88 IROC-Z?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 AM.