2010 - 2015 Camaro Technical Discussion All 5th Generation Camaro technical discussion that doesn't fit in other forums

One Step Closer to a LS3 Camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 07:34 PM
  #16  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Of all the unknowns about this car the engine, IMO, seemed to be the easiest to guess. The LS3 is no different than the L98, LT1, LS1 or LS2 before it. Despite the power these are just mass produced performance SBC's for this day in age.

As for power. If we look back at history and when the Vette and Camaro shared the same engine and trans the only "detune" was the F-bodies more restrictive exhaust and intake which gave GM marketing a nice option to rate the engine as less powerful but as we know that was not the case.
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 07:41 PM
  #17  
MauriSSio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 378
From: San Jose
Originally Posted by TrickStang37
it still doesnt say anything about the LS3 being base V8's in any of those cars. Just that they will be available. Could be as "premium" engines/trims.
i agree, this doesnt seem like news at all, i think it was more conclusive when the G8 GXP was announced as having a detuned LS3, and since its built on the same platform as the camaro, it would make sense that the engines available to the camaro would be the L76 for the "base" V8 (z28?) and the LS3 for the SS. i bet they (G8/camaro) might even be priced VERY similarly.
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 07:44 PM
  #18  
MauriSSio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 378
From: San Jose
Originally Posted by 99SilverSS
....
As for power. If we look back at history and when the Vette and Camaro shared the same engine and trans the only "detune" was the F-bodies more restrictive exhaust and intake which gave GM marketing a nice option to rate the engine as less powerful but as we know that was not the case.
but i believe that the engines are actually certified now, so they cant "underrate" engines anymore.
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 10:07 PM
  #19  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Originally Posted by 3rdGenNut
Please, if it is detuned, make 87 octane the cause.
I am not as educated on the GenIVs as I should be, but what is the minimum octane for the LS2 and 3?

Although the LS1 was rated for 91+ you could run 87 in it if you wanted.
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 11:41 PM
  #20  
My Red 93Z-28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,503
From: BFE, Ohio
Originally Posted by MauriSSio
but i believe that the engines are actually certified now, so they cant "underrate" engines anymore.
I think the number they give has to be within ~2% of the actual SAE rating
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 11:59 PM
  #21  
yellow_99_gt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 393
From: Houston Tx
Originally Posted by My Red 93Z-28
I think the number they give has to be within ~2% of the actual SAE rating
Every production motor has to be within 2% of the certified rating but the rating has to be within 1% of the test motors dyno output.
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 12:16 AM
  #22  
Black5thgen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 138
From: Chicago
If I'm not mistaken wasn't the LS3 designed with AFM and the vette people actually made enough noise that GM didn't offer it in the vette.
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 12:28 AM
  #23  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
AFM is not available for the Vette due to the fact that the exhaust work that it would require for a Corvette to sound like a Corvette in 4cyl mode would be too much for the underside of the car.
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 05:43 AM
  #24  
polo3433's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 188
From: Detroit , MI
If the LS3 is 16mpg city and 26mpg highway in the Vette will that be comparable to the Camaro?
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 05:53 AM
  #25  
christianjax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 881
From: Jacksonville Florida
Originally Posted by polo3433
If the LS3 is 16mpg city and 26mpg highway in the Vette will that be comparable to the Camaro?
I would think that the final weight of the Camaro will factor in that equation.
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 05:55 AM
  #26  
hyperv6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 515
Originally Posted by 3rdGenNut
Please, if it is detuned, make 87 octane the cause.
You should have the option. Most new GM engines allow you to run high test or regular.

It cost about 20 HP in the Series III 3800 SC if you used regular and cause no damage.
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 10:29 AM
  #27  
Ron78Z&01SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 639
From: Wichita, Kansas
Originally Posted by Big Als Z
AFM is not available for the Vette due to the fact that the exhaust work that it would require for a Corvette to sound like a Corvette in 4cyl mode would be too much for the underside of the car.
Haven't heard that one. .

I have read that no DOD on the '08 Corvette had something to do with bad harmonics/vibration in the drivetrain on the Vette.
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 10:46 AM
  #28  
azfan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 145
From: arizona
Has anyone here driven a vehicle with DOD?
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 10:58 AM
  #29  
punkdrum01's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 58
From: Tallahassee, FL
Originally Posted by azfan
Has anyone here driven a vehicle with DOD?
I have.....a Honda Pilot, i dunno how you can really compare the two though Anywayz, the 4 cyl engine shut downs to 3 cyls when you maintain a crusing speed over 45 mph after about 7-8 seconds....Little to no hesitation in cylinder reactivation when u get back on the gas.......

Last edited by punkdrum01; Mar 27, 2008 at 10:59 AM. Reason: typo
Old Mar 27, 2008 | 10:59 AM
  #30  
91Z28350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,011
Yeah my Tahoe has it, it is completely seamless in its operation.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 AM.