2010 - 2015 Camaro Technical Discussion All 5th Generation Camaro technical discussion that doesn't fit in other forums

Horsepower peak @ 5000RPM

Old Jul 21, 2008 | 01:59 PM
  #1  
AdioSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,371
From: Kilgore TX 75662
Horsepower peak @ 5000RPM

This is either a misprint or maybe the folks at GM are being sneaky. Yeah, it only makes 422/400hp@5000RPM (but it makes 440hp@5800RPM.)

I mean, look at the torque peak at 4500.

In the 2009 Corvette, the peaks (with standard exhaust) are 430hp@5900/424tq@4600. Preliminary specs of the G8 GXP LS3 indicate 402hp@6000/400tq@4400.

The only catch that I could see is if it uses variable valve timing, but that's not listed anywhere in the specs.

I can't wait to see the SAE ratings.

Last edited by AdioSS; Jul 21, 2008 at 02:04 PM.
Old Jul 21, 2008 | 02:21 PM
  #2  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
What are you referring to? I didn't see anything about 440hp.
Old Jul 21, 2008 | 02:28 PM
  #3  
AdioSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,371
From: Kilgore TX 75662
that was an example. I don't know what it really makes at 6000RPM.

The DZ302 was only rated at like 290hp despite obviously making more than that, right? Many people joke that it was rated at an RPM lower than where it's peak power really was. I'm suggesting that maybe that idea is being used here also..
Old Jul 21, 2008 | 04:00 PM
  #4  
radz282003's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 84
From: Tree huggin', Bug eatin' Crapifornia
Regardless if there is underrating going on, I think it is agreable that 420 horse' is pretty d@mn good. If I can't get a Z28 in a few years, I wouldn't be too sad with this power. I think they're doing a great job thus far.
Old Jul 21, 2008 | 05:06 PM
  #5  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
The LS3 doesn't have VVT. If the motor is identical to the Vette motor then the only differences would be the chassis specific exhaust components.

I am more concerned about the L99 in the automatic and how much difference in performance there will be between it and the LS3 cars.
Old Jul 21, 2008 | 06:00 PM
  #6  
dacook's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 206
Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
I am more concerned about the L99 in the automatic and how much difference in performance there will be between it and the LS3 cars.
Exactly.
Old Jul 21, 2008 | 06:41 PM
  #7  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
I think it's a misprint I would have expected the HP peak to be in the 5900-6000 range like the LS3 in Vette and G8 GXP.

The 3.6L DI is listed at 300hp at 6400.
Old Jul 21, 2008 | 09:45 PM
  #8  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by AdioSS
This is either a misprint or maybe the folks at GM are being sneaky. Yeah, it only makes 422/400hp@5000RPM (but it makes 440hp@5800RPM.)
It has to be a misprint.

422hp at 5000RPM is 443 lb ft of torque. Yet the torque peak is 408. So there's something fishy.
Old Jul 21, 2008 | 09:59 PM
  #9  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Originally Posted by dacook
Exactly.
Well the official GM performance numbers show the automatics to be quicker in the 1/4 then their respective manual models. That is a little odd. They said they "optimized the shift points." Guess torque converter plus the gearing difference makes up for 20 less HP, more weight, and 600 less revs.
Old Jul 22, 2008 | 12:22 AM
  #10  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
Well the official GM performance numbers show the automatics to be quicker in the 1/4 then their respective manual models. That is a little odd. They said they "optimized the shift points." Guess torque converter plus the gearing difference makes up for 20 less HP, more weight, and 600 less revs.
Do you have a URL for those numbers? I've not seen any numbers for the Camaro yet.
Old Jul 22, 2008 | 01:05 AM
  #11  
Jason Dove's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 561
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
1/4 mile times etc are here:
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=129496
Old Jul 22, 2008 | 01:16 AM
  #12  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by Jason Dove
Thanks. It looks like the A6 is very efficient.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F'n1996Z28SS
Cars For Sale
8
Aug 23, 2023 11:19 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
2
Aug 24, 2015 06:41 AM
Slayer
LT1 Based Engine Tech
2
Aug 17, 2015 03:55 PM
karpetcm
Parts For Sale
5
Aug 14, 2015 03:02 PM
D1SC383LT4
Parts For Sale
1
Jan 26, 2015 01:41 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 AM.