2010 - 2015 Camaro Technical Discussion All 5th Generation Camaro technical discussion that doesn't fit in other forums

the camaro will have a 6.2 for sure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 04:57 PM
  #1  
cjmatt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 983
From: Motor City
the camaro will have a 6.2 for sure

thats all my supplier would tell me. there are also approximately 25k of the supercharged version of the non zr1 ls9 being built also
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 04:59 PM
  #2  
cjmatt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 983
From: Motor City
oh and there is also an LST, T is for Trucks
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 08:30 PM
  #3  
Kershaw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
Well that is encouraging. I wouldn't mind having me one of the 25k ls9 supercharged engines in my 2010.
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 09:34 AM
  #4  
radz282003's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 84
From: Tree huggin', Bug eatin' Crapifornia
Do you mean a production run of 25 engines or that they will cost $25K more?...
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 11:22 AM
  #5  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by radz282003
Do you mean a production run of 25 engines or that they will cost $25K more?...
I think he means 25,000 engines.
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 02:51 PM
  #6  
IREngineer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 854
From: neverneverland
No way they are planning on making 25k supercharged Camaro's. Is the CTS and other supercharged regular production (not LS9) cars possibly being grouped into that number? I think GT500 is ~10k/year and I see this market declining over the next 5 years.
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 06:47 PM
  #7  
blue 79 Z/28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,000
From: Richmond B.C.
im sure it includes the cts-v etc.
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 07:07 PM
  #8  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Keep in mind they always build a percentage of extras just in case they need to replace a few under warranty.
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 07:50 PM
  #9  
RobDarden's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 138
From: Virginia
We can only hope a few makes their way into a Camaro SS.
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 10:24 AM
  #10  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by RobDarden
We can only hope a few makes their way into a Camaro Z28.
Fixed it for you.
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 10:33 AM
  #11  
Tex95Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 347
From: Killeen, Texas
Originally Posted by blue 79 Z/28
im sure it includes the cts-v etc.
I thought the CTS-V got the LSA or am I off base?
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 10:43 AM
  #12  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by Tex95Z
I thought the CTS-V got the LSA or am I off base?
You're dead on.
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 10:50 AM
  #13  
Tex95Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 347
From: Killeen, Texas
Originally Posted by jg95z28
You're dead on.






So that may mean that certian prominent "in the know" members will not be posting in this thread?
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 12:59 PM
  #14  
Ron78Z&01SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 639
From: Wichita, Kansas
Originally Posted by Tex95Z
I thought the CTS-V got the LSA or am I off base?

In my mind I always assumed that LSA was simply the general term given for the engines designed for Automobiles and the LST's were the ones designed for Trucks. LS_ (insert a number here) is used to refer to a SPECIFIC engine (such as LS9).

Think about it, why would GM all of a sudden start referring to specific engine designs with ONLY letters as opposed to letters followed by numerals?

LSA and LST being used to refer to general engine types, NOT specific motors seems pretty obvious to me.......or am I missing something?


......and by the way, I doubt that all 25K of the motors in production are destined for the Caddy. This only reinforces my long standing suspicions that GM will surprise us with the "Bad-@ss" being released FIRST year out.

Last edited by Ron78Z&01SS; Apr 30, 2008 at 01:14 PM.
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 01:00 PM
  #15  
STOCK1SC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,049
From: Confederate States of America
Are there any details of the non ZR-1 LS9? Is it a different supercharger rotor and cheaper internals? I'm confused, I thought the LSA was the cheaper version of the LS9. Educate me, I'm lost and totally confused now with all these different names for these new engines.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:30 AM.