2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

So what should the Camaro run in the 1/4? 0-60?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 09:13 PM
  #31  
TrickStang37's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 619
its going to be tough. so is the high level v8 supposed to have more power than the c6?
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 05:42 PM
  #32  
toegead93's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 616
From: West Palm Beach, FL
That is the rumor. There should be a V8 LS3 equal to or very close to the HP rating of the vette.
The high end V8 is rumored to be a supercharged V8 with over 500hp...of course these are only rumors.

Last edited by toegead93; Dec 18, 2007 at 05:45 PM.
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 04:17 PM
  #33  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
I can see a 580 hp supercharged 6.2L V8 and yes I would buy it.
Old Dec 20, 2007 | 07:38 PM
  #34  
TrickStang37's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 619
so this 580 hp car is going to faster than the base corvette AND cheaper? (MSRP)
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 10:01 AM
  #35  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by TrickStang37
so this 580 hp car is going to faster than the base corvette AND cheaper? (MSRP)
My guess is that it would be priced pretty similarly to a GT500, since that would be its primary competitor.
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 02:20 PM
  #36  
TrickStang37's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 619
GT500............$41,930 MSRP
Super Camaro...$?????? MSRP
C6.................$46,225 MSRP

obviously, the GT500 doesnt sell at MSRP and neither will the super camaro. but its going to be faster and more powerfull than a C6 AND priced Cheaper??
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 03:31 PM
  #37  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by TrickStang37
GT500............$41,930 MSRP
Super Camaro...$?????? MSRP
C6.................$46,225 MSRP

obviously, the GT500 doesnt sell at MSRP and neither will the super camaro. but its going to be faster and more powerfull than a C6 AND priced Cheaper??
Yep, but it won't be a two-seat roadster with cool doodads like magnetic shocks. It'll be a lot heavier, and won't handle as well. It's weight distribution won't be as good. And, I'm guessing, GM won't build nearly as many LS9 Camaros as LS3 Vettes.
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 04:50 PM
  #38  
TrickStang37's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 619
i dont see it happening. everybody looks at 0-60 and 1/4 mi. times, tho way overrated, its always covered in the mags.
Old Dec 23, 2007 | 11:07 AM
  #39  
90rocz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,947
From: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
11.7 @ 149mph
isn't that 9.7 @ 149??

I'd really love to see a top tog Camaro in the mid 12's...

And average, mid level ones in low 13's...

The last gen "SS"s were pulling some 12.80's around here with good track conditions and good tires with great drivers.
Old Dec 23, 2007 | 01:26 PM
  #40  
my94blackz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,064
From: Dobson, NC
Originally Posted by 90rocz

I'd really love to see a top tog Camaro in the mid 12's...


Should be more like high 11's.
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 01:51 PM
  #41  
toegead93's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 616
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Agreed, the base V8 will be close to mid-12's with the LS3.
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 10:59 AM
  #42  
cjmatt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 983
From: Motor City
itll run a high 12, low 13. I expect it to perform very similarly to the last GTO's sold in 06. M6 usually pull a 13.1-13.3@107-109, The auto usually around a 12.9-13.1 with a good launch.

Itll have 3.42 gears. The aussie rear ends pretty much only have 3.42's or 3.90's and GM wont use a 3.90 for gas mileage purposes
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 01:38 AM
  #43  
90rocz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,947
From: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
3.42 gear is pretty near ideal for most purposes, especially since transmissions these days have steeper 1st gears.
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 02:01 AM
  #44  
robb4964's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,130
From: Kentucky
Originally Posted by 90rocz
isn't that 9.7 @ 149??

I'd really love to see a top tog Camaro in the mid 12's...

And average, mid level ones in low 13's...

The last gen "SS"s were pulling some 12.80's around here with good track conditions and good tires with great drivers.

I have seen people who couldnt break 14's in a Dodge Viper.

However,I think low 13's should easily be the " Average" for the new Camaro.
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 12:12 PM
  #45  
90rocz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,947
From: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
I've got a buddy who runs mid 9's....with a 340ci smallblock, in his '72 Demon, ALL MOTOR...727 trans, 4.88:1 gears. He can drive and he can dial in a chassis...

And yeah, I remember beating a lot of LS1 T/A's and Z's in my IROC...some people couldn't get out of the 14's with them. But most were low 13 second cars with good drivers.

Last edited by 90rocz; Jan 2, 2008 at 12:15 PM.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08 AM.