2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

NEWS: Mark LaNeve: Camaro won't be positioned as a muscle car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-25-2008 | 06:58 PM
  #91  
DvBoard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 940
From: Southern Indiana
Originally Posted by jg95z28
I still say there won't be a "base" V8... although there will be at least two.
The lack of a "base" V8 will lose sales to the mustang GT crowd since they can get 2 extra cylinders, even if it doesn't have as much hp.
Old 03-25-2008 | 07:02 PM
  #92  
91Z28350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,011
No it won't, the SS (or Z28) will be the "base" v-8, just as the GT is Fords "base" v-8 model. A true base v-8 would be like the 3rd gen v-8 RS's, had a TBI 305 in them.
Old 03-25-2008 | 07:07 PM
  #93  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,710
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by DvBoard
The lack of a "base" V8 will lose sales to the mustang GT crowd since they can get 2 extra cylinders, even if it doesn't have as much hp.
Originally Posted by 91Z28350
No it won't, the SS (snip) will be the "base" v-8, just as the GT is Fords "base" v-8 model.
Asked and answered.

Let us not put the term "base" V8 on the SS as there will be nothing "base" about it. You'll be able to option it out from basic to luxury, or in "Ford" terms, GT to Mach1.
Old 03-25-2008 | 07:38 PM
  #94  
91Z28350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,011
Hey I can hold out hope until they announce the line up! Rain on someone elses parade, thank you very much!!

Note the use of "" around base, I am sure the first V8 offering will be able to be optioned up quite nicely!
Old 03-25-2008 | 08:13 PM
  #95  
Dragoneye's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 801
From: New York
Originally Posted by jg95z28
Let us not put the term "base" V8 on the SS as there will be nothing "base" about it.
That very thought has been replayed in my head every time somebody says the "Base" V8....
Old 03-25-2008 | 08:38 PM
  #96  
TrickStang37's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 619
Originally Posted by jg95z28
Asked and answered.

Let us not put the term "base" V8 on the SS as there will be nothing "base" about it. You'll be able to option it out from basic to luxury, or in "Ford" terms, GT to Mach1.
thats not a good analogy at all. The MaCh1 had a different v8 than the base GT.

2v/3v 4.6 = base
4v 5.4/4.6 = premium
Old 03-25-2008 | 11:06 PM
  #97  
BigBlueCruiser's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 574
From: Richmond, TX
So here's what we're down to.


2009 Challenger R/T 375hp/404lb-ft 4041lbs 15/23mpg >$30K
2010 Mustang GT 400hp/360lb-ft ~3500lbs >15/>23mpg high 20s

2010 Camaro ? 400+hp/400+lb-ft <3800lbs >15/>23mpg $??



****edited. The insider over on SVTperformance says 2010 stang GT is the 400hp 5.0

Last edited by BigBlueCruiser; 03-26-2008 at 03:48 PM.
Old 03-25-2008 | 11:17 PM
  #98  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,711
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by Eric77TA
That's why I had the question mark. The point I was trying to make wasn't really the exact engines as much as 6, hot V8, Hotter V8, with the latter two not available except in SS/Z28 in whatever level and combo that ends up being. I'm assuming SS will be middle and Z28 will be the "special" car. Which is the way it should be. So is jg95 onto something? I'm guessing his thinking is 3.6, LS3, LS9.
For all intents and purposes, if I was going to save for a V8 Camaro, I'd mentally prepare for the LS3 and nothing else.

If I was going to stockpile $40,000 in my bank account, and be open to paying my local Chevrolet dealer Shelby GT500-like markups, and wanted a car that would have to have carnal knowledge with that same dealer simply to get on the list to get one, I might consider taking a good long look at the LSx engine that's under the hood of the upcoming CTSv.

If I expected 2 normal affordable V8s to choose from in my next Camaro, I'd advise to stop expecting it.

Originally Posted by BigBlueCruiser
The stang GT is going to be closer to 400hp than 300. The Hyundai will still be a cheaper, slower car.
That's why I made a point to say the current Mustang.

The Challenger R/T is going to around $30K with 380hp. The Dodge trucks with the MDS still have the worst mileage of the group. Only the Titan is worse. And the Challenger will outweigh the Camaro and stang by at least 350lbs. So go ahead and take out the overpriced part.
The Dodge Challenger is priced right along with the Pontiac G8 GT, and will be just about as loaded. I wouldn't bet too much on Camaro's V8 being any cheaper. Mustang GTs currently cost $27K, and will likely go up a few percent by this time next year. Safe bet puts the V8 Camaro no lower than $28,000.

Untill we actually see the weight of a loaded Camaro V8, I wouldn't put my neck in that guillotine of 350 pounds, least you loose your head over that assertion.

Don't use the Hemi in the heaviest truck (Dodges are heavier than Chevys-GMCs, and are more powerful by far than Fords) as a yardstick. Use the LX cars instead. The upgraded Hemi will see improved performance and fuel economy.


Again, the reason Ford had a hp gap with Chevy from 96-02 is because they didn't have an engine to compete.

If they had built the '03 Cobra in '99, you would have seen a 300hp DOHC GT for the last few years of the Camaro.
Actually, Ford engineers actually did come up with an engine to compete with the LS1, up to and including using a upgraded 5.4 V8. The problem was Ford management which saw no need to spend the money to pump more power into the Mustang GT when the car was selling as well as it was. That changed around 2000 when Ford finally got serious about competing with GM's F-bodies. the results came up through the Bullitt, Mach 1, and finally the blown Cobra.

Even the current Mustang used the LS1 as a benchmark for acceleration. And there's more Ford can dial up from that engine on short notice with next to no investment. We'll be seeing that next year.
Old 03-26-2008 | 01:19 AM
  #99  
Rob V's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 553
From: British Columbia, Canada
Didn't Bob say something along the lines of "the boys down at powertrain are already talking sh*t and he's got their back, no way is ford going to One-up the Camaro?" Have faith, even with the weakening economy, that this car will succeed.
Old 03-26-2008 | 08:45 AM
  #100  
BigBlueCruiser's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 574
From: Richmond, TX
Originally Posted by Rob V
Didn't Bob say something along the lines of "the boys down at powertrain are already talking sh*t and he's got their back, no way is ford going to One-up the Camaro?" Have faith, even with the weakening economy, that this car will succeed.


Well that's good to hear. Because the 5.0 is bringing it.
Old 03-26-2008 | 09:51 AM
  #101  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,711
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by Rob V
Didn't Bob say something along the lines of "the boys down at powertrain are already talking sh*t and he's got their back, no way is ford going to One-up the Camaro?" Have faith, even with the weakening economy, that this car will succeed.
No, Rob. Bob never said anything like that regarding Camaro versus Mustang.

Both Ford and GM are being secretive regarding the output of their V8 powered 2010 Camaro and redone 2010 1/2 Mustang, so there isn't much way of one knowing how much power the other will be putting out until later this year when final tuning is done.

If the next Mustang GT maintains it's 3500 pound weight (Ford has already manage to cut a few pounds off of the current Mustang over it's life so far) and the engine output is close to 400 along with corresponding increases in torque & Ford's history of good gearing, and Camaro comes in at the weight of the last GTO with the same horsepower figures and GM's history of gearing for fuel economy, I would in no way assume that a V8 Camaro outaccelerating a Mustang GT is automatically a given.
Old 03-26-2008 | 06:18 PM
  #102  
ls1 hawkeye's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 15
From: Tipton, IA
I'm with a couple of you guys. GM can't afford to market the Camaro just as a tire shredding beast with a huge hp number that, unfortunately, people will have the misconception that it's going to suck gas down like nothing else. I have high hopes that this car will get better fuel mileage than my M6 4th gen. car. I love when people ask me what kind of mileage I get and I tell them 23-24 mpg. When I can keep my foot out of it at least. What I don't understand is why so many people are always ready to believe the sky is falling when we get information about the 5th gen. car. I hope there are enough powertrain options to keep this car alive for another 40 years, but it isn't always going to have a V8 as an engine option. I have a sinking feeling that soon we'll see the second death of the pony and muscle cars. I know that I don't want to pay $6 a gallon to drive my Camaro all summer, in what, two years if we're lucky. I think that there was a poll on here last year about what HP is too much? I would like to see the Camaro get a slightly detuned LS3 or whatever will be dropped into the Vette, something around the 400 mark and call it good, how many of you guys really need 500 or more? If you do, order a crate motor from GMPP for your car. Do I really wish there will be a rebirth of the ZL-1 yeah sure, would I buy one, no. Chevy knows there are the enthusiasts out there that want the small block powered cars and maybe I'm in the minority that GM will not disappoint, we may not like what we have to pay for it.

I have a qustion though. Is the premium price I've heard referance to like the gas guzzler tax?
Old 03-26-2008 | 06:43 PM
  #103  
Maddog78's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 21
From: BC
Originally Posted by ls1 hawkeye
I have a qustion though. Is the premium price I've heard referance to like the gas guzzler tax?
I believe it was in reference to the Mustang pricing.
It will cost more. How much is yet to de decided.
Old 03-28-2008 | 08:35 AM
  #104  
mzgp5x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,174
From: MI
Hey, OK, a turbo 4 cyl with a manual 8 or 10 speed trans and high ratio rear gear. Just rev the crap out of it. Just like a ricer. Only a bit heavy. But, you can install a fart can for sound. That would be fun! B.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Queens94z28
Parts For Sale
3
12-20-2014 09:11 PM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
2
12-07-2014 06:01 PM
ChrisFrez
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
2
12-07-2014 11:32 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
12-03-2014 12:30 PM
USAirman93
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
4
11-24-2014 03:37 PM



Quick Reply: NEWS: Mark LaNeve: Camaro won't be positioned as a muscle car



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02 PM.