NEWS: Dual-mode muscle car? GM may develop hybrid Camaro
Filed under: Coupes, Green, Cadillac, Chevrolet, GM, Pontiac

Buried at the end of an article from The Car Connection that discusses the future of General Motors' rear-wheel-drive expansion (or lack thereof) was an interesting canard. In an effort to lower the General's CAFE rating, GM has supposedly assembled a team to outfit the new Camaro with the automaker's dual-mode hybrid drivetrain. The rational behind outfitting a Camaro with a hybrid system might be sound from a fuel-economy standpoint, but offering a fuel-sipping pony car seems like the antithesis of what a muscle-bound coupe is all about.
The article goes on to say that our new CAFE standards have all but killed GM's planned RWD cars, and because the platform underpinning the Camaro was supposed to be utilized on these other vehicles, its costs can't be kept in check. That's likely going to cause the V8 Camaro's sticker to be higher than anticipated -- possibly encroaching on Corvette territory.
Both the Camaro and the Pontiac G8 will live on, but everything else is likely off the table. Rear-wheel-drive Chevys and Buicks are dead in the water, but Cadillac will soldier on with a RWD vehicle to compete in the ultra-luxury segment.
Gallery: Chevy Camaro Concept





Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
More...

Buried at the end of an article from The Car Connection that discusses the future of General Motors' rear-wheel-drive expansion (or lack thereof) was an interesting canard. In an effort to lower the General's CAFE rating, GM has supposedly assembled a team to outfit the new Camaro with the automaker's dual-mode hybrid drivetrain. The rational behind outfitting a Camaro with a hybrid system might be sound from a fuel-economy standpoint, but offering a fuel-sipping pony car seems like the antithesis of what a muscle-bound coupe is all about.
The article goes on to say that our new CAFE standards have all but killed GM's planned RWD cars, and because the platform underpinning the Camaro was supposed to be utilized on these other vehicles, its costs can't be kept in check. That's likely going to cause the V8 Camaro's sticker to be higher than anticipated -- possibly encroaching on Corvette territory.
Both the Camaro and the Pontiac G8 will live on, but everything else is likely off the table. Rear-wheel-drive Chevys and Buicks are dead in the water, but Cadillac will soldier on with a RWD vehicle to compete in the ultra-luxury segment.
Gallery: Chevy Camaro Concept
Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
More...
The author (I assume the Car Connection) of this offers a bunch of speculative garbage. No one is going to pay a corvette price for a v8 camaro. Why not just buy the corvette. GM developed this architecture and the US congress screwed them over. That is just the way business goes. They aren't going to sell any camaros if they jack up the prices to cover all architecture costs.
A hybrid option package would be a good way to extend the new Camaro's reach in the marketplace. Hybrids can be designed to offer lively performance. A V6 hybrid Camaro would appeal to quite a few ecology-minded buyers.
Last edited by BigDarknFast; Feb 4, 2008 at 08:54 AM.
Is a Hybrid powertrain even a viable option here? It would add $5-10,000 and who knows how many hundreds of pounds to a Camaro.
Personally, if I needed to go with a high mpg Camaro, I'd rather have a turbo Ecotec or a diesel over a hybrid any day.
Personally, if I needed to go with a high mpg Camaro, I'd rather have a turbo Ecotec or a diesel over a hybrid any day.
But Zetas are heavy, and building hundreds of thousands of 2(+) ton sedans, no longer fits into GM's future plans. A new smaller lighter RWD architecture should be out by about '11.
The Camaro WILL once again fail if not priced properly. Another speculative "GM is dead" article. And yes, the high end V-8 will be a "high priced" Z28... we already knew that.
Here's the full original article.
http://www.thecarconnection.com/blog/?p=759
It's already been posted under the powertrain section.
Here's the full original article.
http://www.thecarconnection.com/blog/?p=759
It's already been posted under the powertrain section.
Last edited by Silverado C-10; Feb 4, 2008 at 09:46 AM.
...reading the article again....
...to me that statement implies there is an actual 1 mpg penalty automatically applied to any car that is RWD... that can't be right... can it? Or are they just assuming all rwd cars get 1 mpg less than a similar fwd version???
GM, though, is not in a position to absorb the roughly 1-mpg fuel-economy penalty that comes with building rear-wheel-drive passenger cars



