New size comparison shot beside Avenger.

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 20, 2008 | 11:00 AM

#31

vtech95z

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 98

From: roanoke,va

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug Harden

I didn't mean to indicate a repost, but only to add the dimensions and weights I found to this thread....my bad.....

Yep no disrespect at all Doug.....thanks for your research.

Mar 20, 2008 | 04:36 PM

#32

terps

Member

Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 101

From: Great Lakes

Thanks for the dimensions. Looks like the Avenger is an average sedan type of size, so the Camaro size is gonna be perfect IMO!

Mar 22, 2008 | 10:09 AM

#33

JChan611

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2008

Posts: 45

From: Cali

Dodge... LOL
Besides the looks, the Avenger drives like absolute cr*p.

Mar 24, 2008 | 09:52 PM

#34

mlars

Registered User

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 97

From: City of Brotherly Love

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric77TA

Here are some numbers for comparison. Shows how much wider the concept is than the mule. Even accounting for perspective I don't think the Camaro mule is 7.8 inches wider than that Avenger.

Yea it definitely doesn't look almost 8 inches wider form that photo. Too bad I loved how wide the concept was. But at least I'm hearing that the production camaro is the widest camaro ever made

Mar 24, 2008 | 10:01 PM

#35

91Z28350

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 1,011

Maybe I am mistaken, but I thought the concept was actually ~3 inches LESS wide than the stats reported? I could swear that I remember reading that the listed width was a misprint.

Mar 24, 2008 | 10:40 PM

#36

bombebomb

Registered User

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 1,855

From: Ohio

Best pics by far, new camaro is offically going to be awesom.

Mar 25, 2008 | 05:44 AM

#37

LS1Kid717

Registered User

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 237

awesome

Mar 25, 2008 | 09:08 AM

#38

Eric77TA

Registered User

Joined: Nov 2000

Posts: 1,958

From: Kansas City, MO

Quote:

Originally Posted by 91Z28350

Maybe I am mistaken, but I thought the concept was actually ~3 inches LESS wide than the stats reported? I could swear that I remember reading that the listed width was a misprint.

That's entirely possible. I was going by what the most widely printed spec I could find in a few minutes of poking around was. So it may not have been "official."