Making the case for LS3 in top dog Camaro
Re: Making the case for LS3 in top dog Camaro
Originally Posted by TallicA32
Plus, if a supercharger is absolutely necessary for some people, it can always be added onto the 500hp N/A engine for an ENOURMOUS power gain. If the engine comes from the factory supercharged, I almost feel limited with what can be done to the engine as far as modding goes.
From the pics of the concept, there an awful *LOT* of room under that hood - unlike the 3rd and especially 4th gens whose engine was crammed into the firewall with zero hood clearance. Changing a spark plug required a mechanic with special tools(exageration to make a point).
I see a lot of possibilities here - even headers and true dial exhaust looks to be a cinch with the new platform. One reason for trading my 4th gen SS for a Vette was how much better an aftermarket exhaust could work on the Vette. No more stupid 3inch y-pipe going into a single pipe, feeding into a muffler with two outputs. The 5th gen looks to be far more flexible in terms of aftermarket customization.
I wouldn't even want an LS7 if GM were to offer a factory supercharger upgrade to an already stout LS3. Supercharged and factory warrantied/guaranteed....can't beat that. No need to break into the engine for a cam swap or head swap. Dealers would love this, as it would be a good revenue source for their service and parts departments.
Re: Making the case for LS3 in top dog Camaro
Originally Posted by CLEAN
What would your theory be if the small V8 were not made available? The BASE performance V8 was the LS3 by then, and then above that...what?
I'll use 2 sources of information, 1 is the Lutz quote about the 2 V8's, and specifically mentioning 500hp. And 2 is the unnamed guy at the GM Heritage center who is helping design the car, and his quote directly to me that the car is being designed to handle in excess of 500 hp. Take it for what it's worth, but when one of the guys who's actually designing the car, and Superbob say 500hp, I'm sorry, but I go with them.
However I will say that I do like your scenario w/ one change. Make the smalll cube V8 the base V8, but we'll need more than 450hp that by then out of the top dog, I mean 450 is down to TODAY's Shelby, and rumor is there's more to come out of that bad boy by the end of the decade. If the wife got her wish, she would take the 325ish V8 you describe.
I'll use 2 sources of information, 1 is the Lutz quote about the 2 V8's, and specifically mentioning 500hp. And 2 is the unnamed guy at the GM Heritage center who is helping design the car, and his quote directly to me that the car is being designed to handle in excess of 500 hp. Take it for what it's worth, but when one of the guys who's actually designing the car, and Superbob say 500hp, I'm sorry, but I go with them.
However I will say that I do like your scenario w/ one change. Make the smalll cube V8 the base V8, but we'll need more than 450hp that by then out of the top dog, I mean 450 is down to TODAY's Shelby, and rumor is there's more to come out of that bad boy by the end of the decade. If the wife got her wish, she would take the 325ish V8 you describe.
My theory goes to he11 if the small displacent V8 is not made available. That would leave, as I see it, only one option: A common block, such as the 6.2 litre shared between the two V8 platforms - one supercharged, the other N/A. That would seem to make more sense. Supply would come from the same place for both models. You want more power? GM simply adds an SC on top, installs larger injectors and gives the PCM a different program. I am in no way a production guru, but it seems to me that they could do this all on the same assembly line. Actually, I like this theory.
Re: Making the case for LS3 in top dog Camaro
Originally Posted by TallicA32
Plus, if a supercharger is absolutely necessary for some people, it can always be added onto the 500hp N/A engine for an ENOURMOUS power gain. If the engine comes from the factory supercharged, I almost feel limited with what can be done to the engine as far as modding goes.
#1 - DISPLACEMENT. There, in one word, is why the Ford mod motors suck.
#2 - Factory support of the aftermarket. Most importantly, GM MUST NOT lock down the PCM, and must make certain information available to companies like Holley, Edelbrock, Katech, Dart, AFR, etc... And there, in 5 words is why the Hemi family is a second-rate hack job copy of the LSx's. They copied nearly everything... except for the PCM...
#3 - Construction and material selection. Before REALLY gutting a motor and swapping out slugs and rods and a crank, forced induction motors have natural advantages - they generally come with a super-tough reciprocating assembly, AND they generally have very flexible control architectures where the sensors are concerned. In the end, they're easier to mod.
Last edited by PacerX; Jan 28, 2006 at 04:14 PM.
Re: Making the case for LS3 in top dog Camaro
Originally Posted by Shackleford
Let's leave forced induction out of Camaro and Corvette and for the sissy Ford engines. 

Re: Making the case for LS3 in top dog Camaro
Originally Posted by PacerX
In the end, they're easier to mod.
Re: Making the case for LS3 in top dog Camaro
Hey greg nate, are you saying if we put a S/C on it, we wont messup our warr?
I think some dealers would have something to say about that. If I miss read,sorry.
I think some dealers would have something to say about that. If I miss read,sorry.
Re: Making the case for LS3 in top dog Camaro
Originally Posted by Z284ever
No argument there. But I have to say....I don't really care much. I had this conversation with Doug Harden, in Detroit. If I buy 500 factory horses, I won't be too concerned about adding more.
Re: Making the case for LS3 in top dog Camaro
Originally Posted by greg_nate
Designed to handle an excess of 500hp...VERY NICE. Say good bye to drivetrain upgrades such as tranny and differential. Say goodbye to suspension upgrades and stiffeners. That is good information and thanks for the source. This also tells me that we're not going to get a wuss IRS. To handle 500hp, that rear end is going to have to be fairly stout.
This is all I can say, so if it's not enough to at least give you a hint that a 500hp motor is coming, just wait for the cars 2nd or 3rd year.
Re: Making the case for LS3 in top dog Camaro
Originally Posted by 1stls1
Hey greg nate, are you saying if we put a S/C on it, we wont messup our warr?
I think some dealers would have something to say about that. If I miss read,sorry.
I think some dealers would have something to say about that. If I miss read,sorry.Now the above example would depend on the dealership as an add-on. Not all dealerships will do this. However, suppose that GM offered a supercharger setup as an add on part - just like GM does now with the Chevy Cobalt. This would not void the factory warranty. Today, GM offers a stage I and II setup for Cobalts. Smaller blower pulleys and different PCM tuning.
There is a HUGE market for aftermarket performance, and GM wants a slice of the pie. I work in the industry, but on the IT side. GM is trying to get its fingers into that market as well by offering dealer management computer systems(DMS) to their GM dealerships. This is something that has traditionally not been in the area of GM's realm, but they are getting into it now, hoping for revenue from this non-traditional source.
Re: Making the case for LS3 in top dog Camaro
Originally Posted by CLEAN
Ha ha, gotcha! Now name me a time in recent memory where GM designed a car w/ more strength and durability (at added cost to GM) than it needed . In the last cars, we all know the rear ends couldn't handle much more power, or certainly slicks for very long. Why? Because they were only designed to handle the factory designed powertrains. GM doesn't want to save you money on aftermarket mods, they want you to give the money to them!
This is all I can say, so if it's not enough to at least give you a hint that a 500hp motor is coming, just wait for the cars 2nd or 3rd year.
This is all I can say, so if it's not enough to at least give you a hint that a 500hp motor is coming, just wait for the cars 2nd or 3rd year.

Re: Making the case for LS3 in top dog Camaro
Interesting ideas guys... It definitely would be a cool step to include a supercharger in chevy's muscle.
Ah but what would you choose then if a forged N/A LS3 and a sc'ed one were available for the top two models? I guess styling and the price breakpoints for both would settle that question. However... what about getting the 'lowly' LS3 and slapping a turbo on it?
We are definitely in some fun times now... I can only hope that I'll be in the financial position in a few years to play along with you guys. That and insurance better not get their panties bunched up over this.
Ah but what would you choose then if a forged N/A LS3 and a sc'ed one were available for the top two models? I guess styling and the price breakpoints for both would settle that question. However... what about getting the 'lowly' LS3 and slapping a turbo on it?
We are definitely in some fun times now... I can only hope that I'll be in the financial position in a few years to play along with you guys. That and insurance better not get their panties bunched up over this.
Re: Making the case for LS3 in top dog Camaro
Originally Posted by TallicA32
Plus, if a supercharger is absolutely necessary for some people, it can always be added onto the 500hp N/A engine for an ENOURMOUS power gain. If the engine comes from the factory supercharged, I almost feel limited with what can be done to the engine as far as modding goes.
That being said, whatever it takes for the top Camaro to stay on top is alright by me, but I would like to see a naturally aspirated motor in the top dog. Z284ever is right, a high compression, quick revving, naturally aspirated v8 does have a great crackle to it, and I have always liked how an NA engine's power curve is much more linear than most boosted cars.




What if I bought from 1 dealer, but installed s/c at another?