Great set of new Camaro pix from Sweden winter testing

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 26, 2008 | 08:56 AM

terps

Thread Starter

Member

Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 101

From: Great Lakes

Great set of new Camaro pix from Sweden winter testing

posted from
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2999

I love this shot!

Feb 26, 2008 | 09:01 AM

RSHugger

Registered User

Joined: Dec 2007

Posts: 26

From: Oregon

Trailer Hitch!

Design is still working for me... Not sure what is going on with that hood camo though... makes it look like the hood doesn't quite fit. WIP.

Feb 26, 2008 | 09:11 AM

christianjax

Registered User

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 881

From: Jacksonville Florida

very nice. *wiping drool from chin*

Feb 26, 2008 | 09:14 AM

Silverado C-10

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 1,897

From: Greenville, SC

That confirms it... still no spoiler... man, GM must really not want us to see it yet

That is some *weird* hood camo. It looks "normal" from the side, but the frontal shots it looks like someone punched the hood back

I see the third brake light

Last edited by Silverado C-10; Feb 26, 2008 at 09:16 AM.

Feb 26, 2008 | 09:33 AM

skorpion317

Registered User

Joined: Dec 2005

Posts: 1,209

The taillights still look like afterburners.

Feb 26, 2008 | 10:20 AM

gray20

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2005

Posts: 32

From: Bergen County, NJ

Havin a lil extra fun in that last pic or is it just me?

Feb 26, 2008 | 10:27 AM

Geoff Chadwick

Registered User

Joined: Apr 2002

Posts: 2,154

From: All around

Rear Rotors are really close to the size of the fronts.

Rear rotors are slotted, fronts are not.

Big brake option for the fronts?

Feb 26, 2008 | 10:31 AM

vtech95z

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2000

Posts: 98

From: roanoke,va

It just keeps gettin better and better the more i see it. Now rip off the rest of that Camo!

Last edited by vtech95z; Feb 26, 2008 at 10:34 AM.

Feb 26, 2008 | 10:35 AM

km9v

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 1,296

From: Beaumont, TX

What happened to the "No more camo" rule from Lutz?

Feb 26, 2008 | 10:35 AM

#10

terps

Thread Starter

Member

Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 101

From: Great Lakes

I love fbodfather's comment in that forum... poor Scott has to keep repeating himself

Feb 26, 2008 | 10:49 AM

#11

Silverado C-10

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 1,897

From: Greenville, SC

This is crude, so bear with me. I printed out the *almost* perfect side shot drawing and scaled the wheelbase and length based on rim size. Keep in mind, this is crude:

Concept wheelbase: 110.5"

Concept length: 186.2"

Mustang Wheelbase: 107.1"

Mustang length: 187.6"

MY **ESTIMATE** based on 20 INCH RIM SIZE

Wheelbase: 112"

Overall Length: 178"-180"

MY **ESTIMATE** based on 19 INCH RIM SIZE

Wheelbase: 106.5"

Overall Length: 169"-171"

Summary: *MY OPINION* Those are 20" rims and this car IS a hair smaller than the Mustang!

Last edited by Silverado C-10; Feb 26, 2008 at 10:54 AM.

Feb 26, 2008 | 10:52 AM

#12

Black5thgen

Registered User

Joined: Apr 2007

Posts: 138

From: Chicago

There is no way in hell that the rear tires are 245's. It almost looks like the rears are wider than the fronts.

Feb 26, 2008 | 11:04 AM

#13

Silverado C-10

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 1,897

From: Greenville, SC

This is SUPER CRUDE because of the angles of the pics, but I scaled the width of the car to be between 69" and 72".

The concept was 79.6"

Again, I could be way off on this, but I believe 69" would be a pretty good minimum. BUT the width *could* be as wide as 74".