2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Concept the same as production, 500HP an option.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2007, 10:12 AM
  #31  
Registered User
 
posaune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Stafford, Va
Posts: 455
I thought that I saw on here or another site that the Base V8 was the best selling V8 in the second and third Gen. I can't find where I read that now.
posaune is offline  
Old 01-12-2007, 10:30 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by Sixer-Bird
Why would you "hope not"? Wouldn't that be the engine slated for the rumored Z28?

Because I'm not really sure that's where I want the Z/28 to go. In normally aspirated form - near 500 hp will be available in a smaller, lighter, cheaper, more responsive, less complex package. I just don't see the need or desire for a heavier, expensive, less fun to drive, supercharged motor.

I don't especially want the Z/28 to become the Camaro GT500. We shouldn't lose our focus on what the spiritual essence of the Z/28 is. GT500? It's cool alright. But I just see it as a Mustang GT with big brakes, 200 more horsepower, $15,000 more cost and 400 lbs more heft. Not my ideal formula for a Z/28.

I'd rather have a lighter weight, less expensive, more fun to drive, 450-485 hp normally aspirated Z/28. And I wouldn't be surprised if it put the hurt on the big bad GT500 either.

Last edited by Z284ever; 01-12-2007 at 10:50 AM.
Z284ever is offline  
Old 01-12-2007, 10:38 AM
  #33  
Prominent Member
 
Doug Harden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,282
Preach it Charlie...
Doug Harden is offline  
Old 01-12-2007, 10:42 AM
  #34  
Registered User
 
Casull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 336
Originally Posted by 1badLS1M6
I'm pretty disturbed about the part where he said you won't be able to tell the difference between the concept interior and the production interior. The interior is what I haven't worried about up to this point because I mean, it it just so horrible....HORRIBLE....that I just assumed it would be completely redone.

That said, I already plan to buy this car, but I won't buy it with that interior.
I agree completely. I am absolutely in love with the exterior of this car, but I loathe the interior. If they leave the interior unchanged it is going to be hard for me to pull the trigger. I hope the interior either gets a face-lift or it grows on me between now and then.
Casull is offline  
Old 01-12-2007, 11:12 AM
  #35  
Registered User
 
91 Camaro RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 448
I'm glad the production version is going to be very close to the concept. I wasn't sure about the concept interior, but it's really grown on me and now seeing the concept vert with the white instead of that ugly orange I like it even more. My big concern is the steering wheel, I hope it stays like it is. The huge airbags they liked to use on the older Camaros made the steering wheels look ugly and feel clunky.
91 Camaro RS is offline  
Old 01-12-2007, 11:16 AM
  #36  
Registered User
 
91 Camaro RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 448
Originally Posted by Z284ever
I don't especially want the Z/28 to become the Camaro GT500. We shouldn't lose our focus on what the spiritual essence of the Z/28 is. GT500? It's cool alright. But I just see it as a Mustang GT with big brakes, 200 more horsepower, $15,000 more cost and 400 lbs more heft. Not my ideal formula for a Z/28.

I'd rather have a lighter weight, less expensive, more fun to drive, 450-485 hp normally aspirated Z/28. And I wouldn't be surprised if it put the hurt on the big bad GT500 either.
Me either. The Corvette with 100 less HP than the GT500 outperforms it in almost all (if not all) aspects IIRC.
91 Camaro RS is offline  
Old 01-12-2007, 11:33 AM
  #37  
Registered User
 
Chocolate Apocalypse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vegas
Posts: 119
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Because I'm not really sure that's where I want the Z/28 to go. In normally aspirated form - near 500 hp will be available in a smaller, lighter, cheaper, more responsive, less complex package. I just don't see the need or desire for a heavier, expensive, less fun to drive, supercharged motor.

So what is the difference in weight between the top dog Camaro whether its NA or FI? About 100 to 150 pounds worth of blower and assorted hardware. Where is this 400 pounds coming from? And we arent talking about the Mustang, we're talking about a car which hasnt even been produced yet. If you build a car to handle a 450-485 hp NA motor, the weight should be pretty much identical to one built for a 500 hp FI motor (plus the weight of the blower). There shoudlnt be a huge different in weight. I would also gladly pay a little more for a forged (if built right) blower motor that I could just change the pulley on and get instant power gains. Chevy [I]can[I/] build a fun-to-drive, FI, 500hp Camaro that is lighter and cheaper than the GT500. And hopefully they will, cause I want it.
Chocolate Apocalypse is offline  
Old 01-12-2007, 11:36 AM
  #38  
Registered User
 
Z/28lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 311
Originally Posted by 91 Camaro RS
Me either. The Corvette with 100 less HP than the GT500 outperforms it in almost all (if not all) aspects IIRC.
Excuse my ignorance, but what does IIRC mean?
Z/28lover is offline  
Old 01-12-2007, 11:59 AM
  #39  
Registered User
 
Capn Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Posts: 5,308
Originally Posted by Capn Pete
When's the last time they offered 2 V6's in the Camaro??
Originally Posted by CLEAN
1996?
Ok, so there was a cross-over year!! That doesn't count though!
Capn Pete is offline  
Old 01-12-2007, 12:03 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by Chocolate Apocalypse
So what is the difference in weight between the top dog Camaro whether its NA or FI? About 100 to 150 pounds worth of blower and assorted hardware. Where is this 400 pounds coming from? And we arent talking about the Mustang, we're talking about a car which hasnt even been produced yet. If you build a car to handle a 450-485 hp NA motor, the weight should be pretty much identical to one built for a 500 hp FI motor (plus the weight of the blower). There shoudlnt be a huge different in weight. I would also gladly pay a little more for a forged (if built right) blower motor that I could just change the pulley on and get instant power gains. Chevy [I]can[I/] build a fun-to-drive, FI, 500hp Camaro that is lighter and cheaper than the GT500. And hopefully they will, cause I want it.
I said 400 lbs because I WAS talking about the Mustang. Even at an additional 100-150 lbs - you don't think having that over the nose is a big deal for a pony car? Cause I do. And what if GM realizes that people will be doing just what you're saying - pulley changes - and decide to go with an iron block instead of aluminum to protect against crazy boost? And what if GM adds another 100 lbs to the drivetrain as well, as insurance against pulley swappers? You see, unintended consequences. Next thing you know, we've got a Camaro GT500.

As far as your willingness to pay "alittle more"? Wishful thinking. You'd pay several THOUSAND more.

Last edited by Z284ever; 01-12-2007 at 12:22 PM.
Z284ever is offline  
Old 01-12-2007, 12:04 PM
  #41  
Registered User
 
formulaon18s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: kansas city
Posts: 20
I think what he said still leaves it open for a SC version. If the "base" V8 and "HO" V8 is the same engine itself with the addition of a blower I would refer to it as 2 V6's and a V8. But then agian maybe I am still holding on the the hope of a 500hp SS and 400hp Z28.
formulaon18s is offline  
Old 01-12-2007, 12:30 PM
  #42  
Junior Member
 
Adam Bruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Posts: 29
Originally Posted by 1badLS1M6
I'm pretty disturbed about the part where he said you won't be able to tell the difference between the concept interior and the production interior. The interior is what I haven't worried about up to this point because I mean, it it just so horrible....HORRIBLE....that I just assumed it would be completely redone.

That said, I already plan to buy this car, but I won't buy it with that interior.
I kind of like the interior...... Lot better than whats in my 1998 TA.
Adam Bruce is offline  
Old 01-12-2007, 12:34 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
Chocolate Apocalypse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vegas
Posts: 119
A few thousand would be a good deal considering what you would be getting.
It just seems quite a few are "glass half empty" people when it comes to the NA/FI debate. Yes, the potential is there to create a high hp barge like the GT500 but since GM is starting with a blank slate there is the opportinuty to create something great. A hell of a lot better all around performer than the bloated GT500. Even though it will probably be at least a year possibly two before we know anything concrete about the top Camaro, I'm staying optimistic.
So many "what ifs", so little time.

Originally Posted by Z284ever
I said 400 lbs because I WAS talking about the Mustang. Even at an additional 100-150 lbs - you don't think having that over the nose is a big deal for a pony car? Cause I do. And what if GM realizes that people will be doing just what you're saying - pulley changes - and decide to go with an iron block instead of aluminum to protect against crazy boost? And what if GM adds another 100 lbs to the drivetrain as well, as insurance against pulley swappers? You see, unintended consequences. Next thing you know, we've got a Camaro GT500.

As far as your willingness to pay "alittle more"? Doubt it. You'd pay afew THOUSAND more.
Chocolate Apocalypse is offline  
Old 01-12-2007, 12:34 PM
  #44  
Junior Member
 
Adam Bruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Posts: 29
Originally Posted by Z284ever
I don't especially want the Z/28 to become the Camaro GT500. We shouldn't lose our focus on what the spiritual essence of the Z/28 is. GT500? It's cool alright.
Personally I would like to see a return to the 60's line up where there was an SS that was the super horsepower drag race car (Like the Shelby GT500), and a light high-rev racer with great handling (Z/28)..... but I know the market today doesn't work that way, since now when you buy the top of the line you want and expect both.
Adam Bruce is offline  
Old 01-12-2007, 12:59 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
msgZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Houston/Spring, TX
Posts: 210
I am happy with the news. The concept looks awesome. The only thing that I hope changes is the main two gauges, which I'm sure have been fixed. I also hope against a sc V8. I do not want one, and won't pay for it. I guess I will just have to buy the NA version, but I wish that the NA version is the high end V8.
msgZ28 is offline  


Quick Reply: Concept the same as production, 500HP an option.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:10 AM.