Chassis Talk
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,121
From: Houston
Re: Chassis Talk
Originally Posted by nova
Just some food for thought, it could be a visual trick of the CAD program they're using. I don't know which CAD program they're using but I know a lot of them have a "perspective" option in the display settings that changes the way proportions look on screen.
The UGS NX3 CAD program that I use as an aerospace engineering student has that option which makes things look significantly different depending on which perspective option is chosen.
The UGS NX3 CAD program that I use as an aerospace engineering student has that option which makes things look significantly different depending on which perspective option is chosen.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,255
From: new jersey
Re: Chassis Talk
Originally Posted by notgetleft
hmmm, when i did it, i didn't come out quite that big. No time to black it out and post right now though.
whenever you get a chance Ed. i really want to see how they compare.
and thanks for doin this for us.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 808
From: manassas, VA
Re: Chassis Talk
I used the bellhousing flange and a rectangle towards the back of the trans case as references.
btw, no making fun of my chop, best i can do with ms picture it
Last edited by notgetleft; Dec 12, 2005 at 12:15 PM.
Registered User
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 284
From: Franklin Park, NJ, USA
Re: Chassis Talk
Originally Posted by Big Als Z
I wana say teh GTO's is 108? Id say this is abotu 111-113.
Id say that we are gunna have a car about as long, wheel base and overall legth, as my Malibu Maxx.
Id say that we are gunna have a car about as long, wheel base and overall legth, as my Malibu Maxx.
Longer wheel base would be good, less overhang
.Chris
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alliance12364
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
3
Sep 23, 2015 12:40 PM
mark0006
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Sep 14, 2015 12:35 PM