

|
11-06-2008, 12:18 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 181
|
2010 Camaro Exhaust Options
Ok guy/girls...our long awaited car is almost here. I like many others cannot leave well enough alone when it comes to my cars. One of the first changes to my 2SS will be a mean sounding set of mufflers. I have always been a Flowmaster fan, but want something different this time around. I have narrowed it down to Corsa, with the aggressive black mufflers, or SLP loudmouth set up. I like loud muscle cars. Does anyone have any thoughts on these 2 systems, experiences, feedback, other suggestions.
|
|
|
11-06-2008, 12:55 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Richmond B.C.
Posts: 1,961
|
its a new exhaust configuration on a car thats not out yet, i dont think you will find any info yet on which companies are developing what, what their exhausts will look like or sound like.
__________________
95 camaro 383 LT1, AI200cc, AI cam, AI ported intake, full bolt on, 3.73's (in progress)
79 Camaro Z/28 drag car, new 434 sbc in progress, 700hp 650 tq 150 shot old motor,
-10.13@134mph 1.45 60ft 3650lbs
|
|
|
11-06-2008, 01:15 PM
|
#3
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Okemos, MI
Posts: 7,540
|
I have a Corsa system on my current Camaro. I would have to be very impressed by some other system in order to choose anything but that for a 2010, assuming they make one.
__________________
2002 NBM Camaro Z28 M6 - best ET 13.21, best MPH 108.9, best 60' 2.14 - 325hp/343tq - Lid, Corsa, SixSpeedsInc T56, Pro 5.0 w/ short stick, 17x9 wheels
1987 Buick Grand National - best ET 13.66, best MPH 101.5, best 60' 2.08 - 253hp/334tq - 93 chip, RJC, meth, Hooker catback, 160 t-stat, shift kit, no-hop bars
|
|
|
11-06-2008, 01:25 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: ohio
Posts: 2,673
|
borla has designed the gmpp system for the camaro so im sure they are and will be the first to have a system out for the camaro.
i plan on doing the borla catback system and probably hooker long tube headers. just to give it that deep aggressive sound.
|
|
|
11-06-2008, 01:32 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Golden State
Posts: 13,661
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CTK1
Ok guy/girls...our long awaited car is almost here. I like many others cannot leave well enough alone when it comes to my cars. One of the first changes to my 2SS will be a mean sounding set of mufflers. I have always been a Flowmaster fan, but want something different this time around. I have narrowed it down to Corsa, with the aggressive black mufflers, or SLP loudmouth set up. I like loud muscle cars. Does anyone have any thoughts on these 2 systems, experiences, feedback, other suggestions.
|
1. The car is still 3 months from ending up in the showroom.
2. You haven't heard the Camaro's exhaust yet.
3. You have no idea on how efficient the Camaro's exhaust is.
One of the hot rodding mags got ahold of a Challenger SRT8, and (like you) the first thing they did was install an aftermarket exhaust.
Funny thing.
The aftermarket exhaust was more restrictive than the one from the factory. Turns out, the aftermarket exhaust had a smaller diameter than the aftermarket one. If I remember, I've also read that the Challenger SRT8's mufflers are perhaps better than any available aftermarket item.
Both cases, it was Borla.
Wait till it's actually in showrooms and you've heard the exhause tone yourself and read about how efficient it is (or isn't) before blowing that hard earned money that might have better use elsewhere in the car.
__________________
Don't whine... Deal with it!!!
'97 Camaro Z28 6 speed ( SOLD)
'89 Thunderbird SC (manual)
'93 Thunderbird SC (auto)
2002 CHP B4C (auto)
" ...what the Thunderbird SC does best: look great and go fast. Very very fast....responds as if it had a 747 engine on it's roof"
"Better still is this big bruiser's balence...nose and tail bite as one."
"...the big paradox in the SC's character. It's better at going haywire fast than driving slow." (Car and Driver, March 1989)
|
|
|
11-06-2008, 01:35 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: ohio
Posts: 2,673
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by guionM
1. The car is still 3 months from ending up in the showroom.
2. You haven't heard the Camaro's exhaust yet.
3. You have no idea on how efficient the Camaro's exhaust is.
One of the hot rodding mags got ahold of a Challenger SRT8, and (like you) the first thing they did was install an aftermarket exhaust.
Funny thing.
The aftermarket exhaust was more restrictive than the one from the factory. Turns out, the aftermarket exhaust had a smaller diameter than the aftermarket one. If I remember, I've also read that the Challenger SRT8's mufflers are perhaps better than any available aftermarket item.
Wait till it's actually in showrooms and you've heard the exhause tone yourself and read about how efficient it is (or isn't) before blowing that hard earned money that might have better use elsewhere in the car. 
|
well obviously they have done the research on the gmpp exhaust and im sure it has a better sound to it( better as in deeper, and maybe a bit more hp rating). and it was already confirmed from a guy at borla that they made the gmpp exhaust. i would imagine if borla made this gmpp exhaust then it has to have some advantages over the stock.
|
|
|
11-06-2008, 05:51 PM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,200
|
I'll be installing a set of chambered mufflers on my car. I love the way they sound.
__________________
1998 Camaro 3.8L M5 - Some bolt-ons, !Rear seats, '93-96 tail light conversion
15.269@90.84 MPH
2009 Malibu LS
2010 Camaro SS/RS M6
|
|
|
11-06-2008, 05:55 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,200
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by guionM
One of the hot rodding mags got ahold of a Challenger SRT8, and (like you) the first thing they did was install an aftermarket exhaust.
Funny thing.
The aftermarket exhaust was more restrictive than the one from the factory. Turns out, the aftermarket exhaust had a smaller diameter than the aftermarket one. If I remember, I've also read that the Challenger SRT8's mufflers are perhaps better than any available aftermarket item.
Both cases, it was Borla.
|
That magazine was Hot Rod. The Borla Magnum system they installed had a 2 1/2-inch diameter, compared to the stock system's 2 3/4-inches. The Borla system, however, picked up 17 HP on the dyno over the stock system.
__________________
1998 Camaro 3.8L M5 - Some bolt-ons, !Rear seats, '93-96 tail light conversion
15.269@90.84 MPH
2009 Malibu LS
2010 Camaro SS/RS M6
|
|
|
11-07-2008, 02:37 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ballwin, MO
Posts: 821
|
I promise that welding a set up Dynomax or equivilent bullet mufflers will outflow, make the car louder, and be cost effecient.  May not be everyones cup of tea however. If GM runs a 2.5 inch true dual system stock you will have enough pipe to support 500 hp or so.
__________________
1999 Camaro SS #3347 Lid, SSRA, LS6 Intake, Hotcam, Jet-Hot LT's, True Duals, McLeod Street Twin, 4.10's
|
|
|
11-07-2008, 03:15 PM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: ohio
Posts: 2,673
|
i think im going to go with 3" all the way from the headers.
|
|
|
11-07-2008, 11:38 PM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 5
|
Muffler? What muffler? I plan on getting rid of mine probably the first week. It should be loud enough then... Anybody thought about doing the cutouts like we use to?
|
|
|
11-08-2008, 12:51 AM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston Area
Posts: 518
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010_5thgen
i think im going to go with 3" all the way from the headers.
|
Why? From what I understand, bigger diameter doesn't necessarily make more horsepower or torque.
|
|
|
11-12-2008, 08:12 PM
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: LaGrange KY USA
Posts: 330
|
3" good idea-she'll breathe easier for the future mods
|
|
|
12-24-2008, 08:20 AM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 382
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by twistedwedge
3" good idea-she'll breathe easier for the future mods 
|
But until you add the required mods, you'll be down on torque numbers due to the huge 3" dual exhaust on the factory setup.
I would stick to either a muffler sawp/muffler delete until the new mods are done. Heads/Cam, cold air, and a set of long tubes would get you close to actually using the dual 3" exhaust, but ideally, yoiu would be looking at stoker or forced induction to need that kind of exhaust flow. If the cats are as efficient as the ones on the new Vettes, then you won't gain tons of power form cutting them, just more noise.
|
|
|
12-27-2008, 01:30 PM
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 682
|
3" is a good diameter for a single I-pipe, but oversized for a true dual exhaust unless your pushing serious horsepower. As mentioned above, you'll be less efficient with a system that large without a serious head/cam or power adder (ie. s/s, nitrous, turbo).
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS A6 - !bowtie!
1993 Z28 A4
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 PM.
|