Drag Racing Technique Improve your track times

Just found some old timeslips

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 09:46 PM
  #1  
Red-LT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 106
Just found some old timeslips

I just found timeslips from March of 2006, the first time I was ever at the track. It was Orlando Speed World, not really known for being the best track, but that still doesn't explain how poorly I did.

First of all I must have been half asleep. Second I really pun my tires bad. Even still I managed a decent MPH given the terrible ET's.

First Pass: Second Pass

RT 0.878 0.713
60' 2.570 3.132
330' 6.670 7.305
1/8 9.840 10.481
MPH 75.24 77.16
1000' 12.725 13.229
1/4 15.114 15.528
MPH 95.47 98.68

Tell me these aren't some weird slips, especially the second. Besides it being my first time, I also had a problem with my engine bouncing off the rev limiter and not shifting until I backed off.

I also didn't lose any PSI on the rear tires, ran at 33 or so. Didn't know any better.

So what are some average 60' times? RT is factored into ET right? That would make me feel a little bit better. I don't know what I was smoking that night to slow down my RT like that, damn lol. I blame it on it being my first time.

Yet even with all my problems the MPH isn't bad.

Last summer I ran it at Raceway park in NJ (an impeccably better track) and with a bit more practice and did 108-something MPH. I have to look for those now

Just thought I'd poke a little fun at myself being a n00b

Oh, also, what would be a good number to enter for weight of our cars? I'm using a HP from MPH calculator and using 3600, but I think 3700 is more realistic. Anyone?

Last edited by Red-LT1; Aug 19, 2008 at 09:52 PM.
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 09:52 PM
  #2  
SS RRR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
They don't look weird to me. First time I took the SS out was the summer of 1996 (ordered it in Jan.) and I was running up against my brother-in-law's 1990 bolt-on Cougar XR7. Needless to say he destroyed me. Can't remember what the exact numbers were, but I know he ran a low 15 to my mid 15 and he treed the **** out of me. Very embarassing since the SS was a novelty back then...
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 10:14 PM
  #3  
Red-LT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 106
Well using a calculator they ET and MPH don't match up at all. Means I had no traction I suppose.

http://www.wallaceracing.com/hpcalculatorquarter.php

Your HP computed from your vehicle ET is 173.96 rear wheel HP and 193.29 flywheel HP.
Your HP computed from your vehicle MPH is 226.15 rear wheel HP and 251.28 flywheel HP.

Your HP computed from your vehicle ET is 160.41 rear wheel HP and 178.24 flywheel HP.
Your HP computed from your vehicle MPH is 249.74 rear wheel HP and 277.49 flywheel HP.
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 11:13 PM
  #4  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,124
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Originally Posted by Red-LT1
I So what are some average 60' times? RT is factored into ET right? That would make me feel a little bit better. I don't know what I was smoking that night to slow down my RT like that, damn lol. I blame it on it being my first time.
With street tires, you should be looking for 2.0-sec 60-ft times, or lower.

Reaction time is NOT "factored into" ET. The ET clock does not start until you break the beams. A 14-second car will run 14-seconds with a .000 reaction time, or a 2-minute reaction time.
Old Aug 20, 2008 | 01:36 PM
  #5  
Javier97Z28's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,853
From: Jupiter (NPB), Fl
Originally Posted by Red-LT1

Oh, also, what would be a good number to enter for weight of our cars? I'm using a HP from MPH calculator and using 3600, but I think 3700 is more realistic. Anyone?
Try 3420 or so + driver weight

My fully loaded z28 w/ skinnies, no sway bar, and no spare/jack weighed in at 3370 w/o driver back in the day. I figure that's about 50lbs off from stock.
Old Aug 20, 2008 | 01:56 PM
  #6  
6SpdLT1Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,595
From: Lenexa, KS
timeslips look fine, you just spun a lot off the line. improve your 60's and you'll be in the low 14's and possibly break into the 13's.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nayr
LT1 Based Engine Tech
7
Mar 3, 2023 08:34 PM
marlar98
LT1 Based Engine Tech
15
Sep 12, 2018 07:18 AM
Double aught
LT1 Based Engine Tech
7
Oct 2, 2015 11:29 PM
Wart Hog
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
Sep 8, 2015 05:53 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Aug 17, 2015 11:40 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:04 AM.