new emission test went GREAT
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 217
From: Hurst TX
new emission test went GREAT
Wow, I thought my TA with 79K might do well but it passed like new.
25mph 15mph
allowed results allowed results
HC 114 11 117 21
CO 0.63 0 0.65 0
NOX 796 161 879 6
Dilution >6.0 14.9 >6.0 14.9
------------------
Adam in Hurst TX
95TA M6 Borla Cat Back
!TB,!MAF,Ripper,Tuner Cat
HP160, !UD pulley,CAI,
24# SVO
Best 1/4 13.79 101.4
25mph 15mph
allowed results allowed results
HC 114 11 117 21
CO 0.63 0 0.65 0
NOX 796 161 879 6
Dilution >6.0 14.9 >6.0 14.9
------------------
Adam in Hurst TX
95TA M6 Borla Cat Back
!TB,!MAF,Ripper,Tuner Cat
HP160, !UD pulley,CAI,
24# SVO
Best 1/4 13.79 101.4
Registered User
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 3,144
From: Jackstandican
As long as you keep the motor tuned, oil changed faithfully, cat(s) are in working order and change/clean the filter then you should never have any worries no matter the mileage.
------------------
1996 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 SS #597
What?
------------------
1996 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 SS #597
What?
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 232
From: S. FL I help launch stuff into space
I passed too...In DE of course...2500rpm test(no dyno...they don't do that in DE).
test allowed as tested
Hydrocarbons 220 43
CO 1.2% 0.05%
C02 40.0 12.0
so much for emissions...oh..did I say I have a 98 Trans Am with an 8# ATI Procharger
DarkblueTA
8# Prochager
test allowed as tested
Hydrocarbons 220 43
CO 1.2% 0.05%
C02 40.0 12.0
so much for emissions...oh..did I say I have a 98 Trans Am with an 8# ATI Procharger DarkblueTA
8# Prochager
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 217
From: Hurst TX
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by DarkblueTA:
I passed too...In DE of course...2500rpm test(no dyno...they don't do that in DE).
test allowed as tested
Hydrocarbons 220 43
CO 1.2% 0.05%
C02 40.0 12.0
so much for emissions...oh..did I say I have a 98 Trans Am with an 8# ATI Procharger
DarkblueTA
8# Prochager</font>
I passed too...In DE of course...2500rpm test(no dyno...they don't do that in DE).
test allowed as tested
Hydrocarbons 220 43
CO 1.2% 0.05%
C02 40.0 12.0
so much for emissions...oh..did I say I have a 98 Trans Am with an 8# ATI Procharger DarkblueTA
8# Prochager</font>
Why doesn't the whole damn country smog/dyno test? I say all or none. Why is OK to pollute if you live in Iowa (not picking on IA) but not in Ill etc? And how about the turds who live in a county that don't test and drive their POS 1975 Ford F150 into my TOWN stinking up the air on 7 cylinders, every day for work.
OK off my soap box. With all my extra room I need a cam so I can pollute to max allowed by law.
------------------
Adam in Hurst TX
95TA M6 Borla Cat Back
!TB,!MAF,Ripper,Tuner Cat
HP160, !UD pulley,CAI,
24# SVO
Best 1/4 13.79 101.4
Registered User
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19
From: dallas
15 mph low speed dyno sniffer
HC 42 (117 was max allowable)
CO .04 (.65 was max)
NOX 496 (879 was max)
25 mph high speed dyno sniffer
HC 34 (114 was max)
CO .02 (.63 was max)
NOX 540 (796 was max)
Not bad for FLP long tubes, its funny, our cars are actually cleaner then a lot of econo cars if just kept in good tune.
HC 42 (117 was max allowable)
CO .04 (.65 was max)
NOX 496 (879 was max)
25 mph high speed dyno sniffer
HC 34 (114 was max)
CO .02 (.63 was max)
NOX 540 (796 was max)
Not bad for FLP long tubes, its funny, our cars are actually cleaner then a lot of econo cars if just kept in good tune.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 217
From: Hurst TX
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by mark94z:
15 mph low speed dyno sniffer
HC 42 (117 was max allowable)
CO .04 (.65 was max)
NOX 496 (879 was max)
25 mph high speed dyno sniffer
HC 34 (114 was max)
CO .02 (.63 was max)
NOX 540 (796 was max)
Not bad for FLP long tubes, its funny, our cars are actually cleaner then a lot of econo cars if just kept in good tune.</font>
15 mph low speed dyno sniffer
HC 42 (117 was max allowable)
CO .04 (.65 was max)
NOX 496 (879 was max)
25 mph high speed dyno sniffer
HC 34 (114 was max)
CO .02 (.63 was max)
NOX 540 (796 was max)
Not bad for FLP long tubes, its funny, our cars are actually cleaner then a lot of econo cars if just kept in good tune.</font>
Any other mods?
I would like header too. Anybody with hot cam or cc305 try the texas two step dyno test yet?
------------------
Adam in Hurst TX
95TA M6 Borla Cat Back
!TB,!MAF,Ripper,Tuner Cat
HP160, !UD pulley,CAI,
24# SVO
Best 1/4 13.79 101.4
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 641
From: Dollars, Taxes
I'm considering throwing mine up one as soon as the new setup is in to see how much i'll be stinking up the air
------------------
94 Formula A4, 3.23's
The usual bolt ons...
13.8@100 2.03 60' (old time)
coming soon: '93 M29 T56, kmook's old stuff
------------------
94 Formula A4, 3.23's
The usual bolt ons...
13.8@100 2.03 60' (old time)
coming soon: '93 M29 T56, kmook's old stuff
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 130
From: Fort Worth, TX
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by rckrzy1:
Any other mods?
I would like header too. Anybody with hot cam or cc305 try the texas two step dyno test yet?
</font>
Any other mods?
I would like header too. Anybody with hot cam or cc305 try the texas two step dyno test yet?
</font>
Patrick
------------------
My Camaro & Mustang
1994 Camaro Z28 A4
------------------
Heads, cam, LT's ~336 rwhp, 331 rwtq~
1989 Mustang LX 5.0
------------------
Coast High 347, Twin T3 Turbos...
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 217
From: Hurst TX
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by pattymelt1285:
I failed with the cc305 but I need a tune bad! I think If i leaned it out I could pass.
Patrick
</font>
I failed with the cc305 but I need a tune bad! I think If i leaned it out I could pass.
Patrick
</font>
------------------
Adam in Hurst TX
95TA M6 Borla Cat Back
!TB,!MAF,Ripper,Tuner Cat
HP160, !UD pulley,CAI,
24# SVO
Best 1/4 13.79 101.4
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 232
From: S. FL I help launch stuff into space
s
Hey...I agree with you. The thing is, most of us don't have to worry about passing/failing. I just say, hey..if you can see black(to much fuel)/blue(oil)/white(anti-freeze) smoke coming out your tail pipe, then you shouldn't be driving the thing on the road w/o fixing it first. But heck..what do I know?
DarkblueTA
8# Prochager
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by rckrzy1:
That's the part I hate. Why are all "standards" NOT. Why is your 98 OBD2 allowed twice the emisions of my 95 OBD1 ?
Why doesn't the whole damn country smog/dyno test? I say all or none. Why is OK to pollute if you live in Iowa (not picking on IA) but not in Ill etc? And how about the turds who live in a county that don't test and drive their POS 1975 Ford F150 into my TOWN stinking up the air on 7 cylinders, every day for work.
OK off my soap box. With all my extra room I need a cam so I can pollute to max allowed by law.
</font>
That's the part I hate. Why are all "standards" NOT. Why is your 98 OBD2 allowed twice the emisions of my 95 OBD1 ?
Why doesn't the whole damn country smog/dyno test? I say all or none. Why is OK to pollute if you live in Iowa (not picking on IA) but not in Ill etc? And how about the turds who live in a county that don't test and drive their POS 1975 Ford F150 into my TOWN stinking up the air on 7 cylinders, every day for work.
OK off my soap box. With all my extra room I need a cam so I can pollute to max allowed by law.
</font>
DarkblueTA
8# Prochager
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post