V6 Tech 1967-2002 V6 Engine Related

Stock 3.8 Times? 5spd or A4?

Old Oct 28, 2002 | 07:40 AM
  #1  
ProjectRS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 492
From: AK Ron
Question Stock 3.8 Times? 5spd or A4?

Hey guys. Long time no see, but I am about to re-enter the v6 world!

I am selling my 97 Grand Am GT and getting a v6 Camaro!

I dont want another 3.4 Like my old camaro cuz that thing was just too slow for a v6!

So I'll probably get like a 96+ Camaro with the 3.8. What do they run stock? (my 4 bager GT runs 16.7 Stock)

Also, This is gonna be my daily driver! I got the Ws6 for a show/show-off fat car.

The Ws6 has the 6 speed! So I am having fun with that!
Now should I get the v6 with Auto ar 5spd? I want an A4 for consistant track times (im gonna race it) But I want the 5 speed so I can better drive it in snow! Which one should I get?
Old Oct 28, 2002 | 08:38 AM
  #2  
02T-Camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 11
From: Miami, Fl
I got at the track last week with a completely stock 2002 camaro V6

16.499 @ 83.49 MPH

That was the best time I got
Old Oct 28, 2002 | 12:15 PM
  #3  
MustangEater82's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,738
From: Charleston, SC
I think I could sqeeuze a 15.6-.7 in my dads 2k, but I had only driven it for 2 days before I took it to the track, I managed a 15.875, like stated in the sig, thats stock with 7k miles on it.


I would get a 5-speed whatever you do especially if you already have a 6-speed, it doesn't get old, I think most 4-banger and 6-banger cars should be manual trannies anyways to use the power they have most effectively.
Old Oct 28, 2002 | 01:28 PM
  #4  
ProjectRS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 492
From: AK Ron
Originally posted by MustangEater82
I think most 4-banger and 6-banger cars should be manual trannies anyways to use the power they have most effectively.
Can you explain this statement above please.

And are you implying that 4/6 bangers with stick are faster?
I heard of this but im not sure if its true or not
Old Oct 28, 2002 | 02:09 PM
  #5  
MustangEater82's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,738
From: Charleston, SC
Well my belief but I have found the v6 world generally thinks autos are faster.


First there is a less drivetrain loss in a manual drrivetrains so more of the power form the motor is making it ot hte wheels.

Second, its mroe evident in 4 bangers then I think in v6s but still applies in alot of places.

a 4 banger usually has a "peaky" hp/torque curve, and much smaller power bands. Generally in a 4 banger the power is in a power band say from 4500-5100. With an auto you cannot always change where the shift point is, with an auto you can control the car better in so that it stays in that effective pwoer range, and allows you to rev pas it so when you hit the next gear you start off in that powr range instead of boggin then working your way back into the power range.

Its also similar with v6s, in alot of ways I think even more son in 3.8Ls, since there peak torque is higher in the RPMs.

now a v8, has low peak torque, and is generally pretty powrful all across the powerband, compared to a I4 or v6, so it is not as hard to keep a car in the power band.

So you can control the the car to keep it in the pwoer band so the manual tranny uses the power most efficently, assuming the driver drives it right but driving skills are easier learned then custom programing to allow your car to shift at certain points.

And antoehr important factor is you can "stall" a 5-speed, basically you can get a higher RPM launch then you can over a stock auto. Only thing keeping your form hard launches in a M5 is wheel spin.

Thats my reasoning....


And my rebuttal to the "well the fastest v6s are all autos debate"

Well the Borg Warner T5 is a pretty weak transmission as transmission go thats why it was never put on anything bigger then a 305 tpi in 3rd gens. I think its rated to only handle 300 ft. lbs. of torque, but there are very few any making that sort of power.

Second, what is one thing that the people with the fastest cars all have, MONEY, when they bought there cars, they bought them with most the creature comforts, and most f-bodies are autos. Thats another theary of why they have autos.

Just the fact that 5-speeds are slightly rare, when my dad was looking for a 5-speed 2k with "some" options like pwoer windows, and t-tops, and in Navy blue, me and him spent 2 months searching and could not find one, so he had to settle without the t-tops, we did find one firebird that was navy blue and similar options 5-speed and t-tops, but it was $20,000, compared to the Camaro for $15k, so he settled without the t-tops.
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 03:42 PM
  #6  
bowtieracer6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25
From: Tucson, AZ
I agree with MustangEater. My friend in his 2001 3.8 5spd (NOT LYING) ran a 14.5!!! with intake, exhaust and 3.73's. I myself ran a 15.8 stock, keeping in mind it was my first time ever to the track and the car had around 85,000 on the clock back then.
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 04:24 PM
  #7  
Infernal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 27
From: Albany, NY, USA
Infernal

My 2000 3.8 (A4) ran 15.5 stock with 3.42s and LSD.
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 05:24 PM
  #8  
1fastV6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 805
From: san anto, tx
DAYAMN!!! 14.5 with intake, exhaust and 3.73s. i needz to get me some 3.73s!
i never ran it stock, but with an airlid and dynomax muffler i ran 15.5 @ 88 mph.
Old Oct 29, 2002 | 07:56 PM
  #9  
Joshs99BlackBeauty's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 257
From: Aiken, South Carolina
I ran 16.0 @ 85 on a hot and humid day, with SLP CAI, flowmaster, and not cat in my 99 3.8
Old Oct 30, 2002 | 12:33 AM
  #10  
bowtieracer6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25
From: Tucson, AZ
Yeah 14.5, I didn't believe it when i saw it. BTW he pulls a 1.9 60'
Old Oct 30, 2002 | 01:16 AM
  #11  
MustangEater82's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,738
From: Charleston, SC
As for 5-speeds guy around here with a 99 5-speed maro ran a 14.9 with 3.73s, intake, and exhaust.
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 01:21 PM
  #12  
TS99V6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 6
From: Dallas, TX, USA
Use to have a 99 V6 A4 Camaro before I traded it in for the '02 Maxima. The best I ran with SLP cold air kit, whisper lid, Borla cat-back and Trango shift kit was a 15.6.
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 02:12 PM
  #13  
cobra2550's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 125
so your saying that your Grand AM GT was faster than a 3.4
Old Oct 31, 2002 | 05:05 PM
  #14  
john00V6A4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 16
From: baton rouge, louisiana, usa
bone stock i went 15.20, then after intake and exhaust i went 14.70. my car is an a4 by the way
Old Nov 1, 2002 | 01:59 AM
  #15  
chesee48's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,674
From: Chicago, IL
"bone stock i went 15.20"

NO WAY....my friend has a 98 a4 and the best he could pull off stock was 15.9

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 AM.