V6 Tech 1967-2002 V6 Engine Related

rear end gears for turbo 3.4L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 09:56 PM
  #1  
oil pan 4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 878
From: Clovis, NM
Question rear end gears for turbo 3.4L

I all ready have one of those $100 torsen units from SLP and I called and got some axels for it from the junk yard.
I don't know if I should keep the 3.42 and there top end speed or fork over the $$$ and get some 3.73's and there low end acceleration. I'm not having the torsen put in untill I know what gears I want to use.
I am useing 2 audi VW 06A turbos there kinda small so they won't lag. The one I have is brand new now all I need is a second.
The car has is a 85' with a brand new 3.4L with a crane 270 cam and $40 kmotion springs with a 2.8 fuel injection system and 22lb.hr injectors, also a standard transmission (back home).
I have 2.8 heads 3.4 intake manifold and 2.8 pentum with TB, fuel rail and MAF; 1 of the 2 audi VW turbos and 2 saab intercoolers over here with me.
What do you think?
Old Jul 4, 2003 | 10:33 PM
  #2  
1fastV6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 805
From: san anto, tx
i think you should keep the 3.42s
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 01:19 AM
  #3  
99blackSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,719
From: Bay Area, CA
I would stay with the 3.42s. How much hp is this car producing?
Old Jul 5, 2003 | 03:15 AM
  #4  
MustangEater82's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,738
From: Charleston, SC
Do you know if our T5s have the same gearing between my 4th gen and your 3rd gen? Honestly I like how my car is I am not real sure I woudl have wnated to go for 3.73s in my car, seems to lose alot of huff in the top of 3rd gear as is, granted your turbos will help out since it will give you more topend on your motor so its hard to say. I can tell you though 1st gear is like nothing in my car with my 3.42s and 5-speed, seems like it woudl pretty steep with 3.73s in.
Old Jul 7, 2003 | 07:34 AM
  #5  
oil pan 4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 878
From: Clovis, NM
It should be makeing about 190hp with out the turbos.
With the TT's, intercoolers the ported and respringed heads, cam 1.6 rockers I wan to make about 260hp.
Old Jul 7, 2003 | 04:50 PM
  #6  
MustangEater82's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,738
From: Charleston, SC
I say 3.42s, seems 3.73s are relatively popular with t56s in 4th gens, and since T5s have more hear then T56s, seems 3.42s would be fine.

jsut my thought... though the main reason I got my 3.42s is my rear end was trash and found a used WS6 one reall cheap.
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 01:06 AM
  #7  
Tiago's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 368
From: HOUSTON-TX
you have low goals for such an involved project.

btw I run 3.73s and I love them.
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 08:52 PM
  #8  
oil pan 4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 878
From: Clovis, NM
The 260hp is my base line numbers.
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 05:23 PM
  #9  
burnemonm1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 156
From: Michigan
how much power can a sock 98 camaro Y87 (3.42 posi) hold, LT1 nitrous to much for that axle?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
jcamaro95lt1
LS1 Based Engine Tech
1
Jan 24, 2015 08:21 AM
nodnarb481
Middle Atlantic
0
Jan 1, 2015 11:43 PM
The Seer
Classic Engine Tech
2
Nov 26, 2014 05:55 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 PM.