V6 Tech 1967-2002 V6 Engine Related

Question about the 3.4 vs 3.8

Old Dec 15, 2002 | 07:21 PM
  #16  
ibanez6rg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,579
From: Cincinnati, OH
The 3.4s are 160HP and 200lbs of torque, talk about power!
Old Dec 19, 2002 | 07:26 PM
  #17  
2_shady's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 136
From: Commerce, MI
15.7 is not that great of a time for a 3.8l
i went to the track about 2 months ago.. i have a 96 3.8 with slp CAI and catback exhaust.. some suspension mods and the factory 3.42 lsd.. and for weight reduction i just took out my spare tire, and system..
it was a cool night.. about 40-50 degrees
my best run was a 15.1 without a serpentine belt..which was a bad move since in just 1 run my engine almost hit red zone by the end of the pass and i had to shut it down to cool it off before i returned... 15.3 was my best with it on and my average was about a 15.5... 15.8 was my highest time
my buddy with a 97 v6 with just exhaust ran a best of 15.7
Old Dec 19, 2002 | 08:03 PM
  #18  
CLEAR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 680
From: INDIANA
take it from me...a guy that has had both. i had a 95 3.4 now i have a 98 3.8, you want the 3.8

either way you will have fun. if your looking for mods id say that there are the most for a 95-97 3.8

when i had my 3.4 i wanted a 3.8 now i have it and i wouldnt mind having more but im 19
Old Dec 19, 2002 | 09:03 PM
  #19  
Slowmaro1988's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 37
From: Barboursville, WV, USA
Im not getting a lt1 car....one reason is snow driving. I know a v6 camaro wont be the best snow car but it would be much better than a lt1 car. I already have a project car...I hope to see 12s this summer with my 88 after the head swap and cam.

The v6 is just for a daily driver...I might be getting a DSM now Im not sure. AWD would be nice for snow thats for sure. Plus those DSMs run high 14s stock which is faster than most any v6 camaro/firebird (except the TTA).
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 02:28 AM
  #20  
bluecmaro96's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 608
From: windber pa
The 3.8 have 200 hp and 225 ft lbs not 230 ft lbs, And i dont care what you think your 3.4 doesnt sound like a v8 its a v6 and no matter what it wont sound like a v8 in all honesty, you just cant get that v8 rumble.
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 02:05 PM
  #21  
thadoc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 8
From: Lubbock, Tx
hey i have a 3.4 and it isn't that bad it is brought up to be! Yea everyone is right about the top end (N), but my little 6 banger can accelerate pretty damn good. With just a few minor mods I could take a 3.8 though the 1/4 with ease! and i also have flowmaster 80 series, and sounds pretty good!





95 3.4 A4 Camaro
Hooker Headers
Flowmaster 80 Series
K/N Filtercharger
Msd Ignition
PP3
Old Dec 20, 2002 | 07:32 PM
  #22  
greenL32's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1
From: Suburbia, IL
I've had my 3.4 since October 2000, and it's been great to me. Raw numbers, the 3.8 has more power. For pure speed, the 3.8 is definitely faster. And the LT-1 is faster than either, of course. In my case, insurance cost, winter driving, etc., didn't allow the good 'ol 5.7L route, and although the numbers aren't as high as, say, a 3.8L Bonneville, the looks, handling, driveability, and other aspects of the F-Body are all in full-force. You'll be happy with either, I was originally looking at third gens and found a great 3.4L, so I went with it, and I have no regrets. Get what you can afford for now, and know that you can always mod it to your liking! Happy car hunting!
Old Dec 21, 2002 | 12:28 AM
  #23  
Slowmaro1988's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 37
From: Barboursville, WV, USA
I wont be modding this car much if at all. Like I said Im gonna do some crazy **** to my 88. I already have a good basis with it. Brand new 350...all kinds of good stuff. I just want a normal car with AC to drive everyday and while my 88 is in 1000 pieces.
Old Dec 21, 2002 | 02:13 AM
  #24  
94TeALFiReBiRd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 162
From: Collinsville IL
Originally posted by CODY BEHNKE
LO3's may not be HP monsters but they will still kil a 3.4, 170HP ans 255FtLbs vs 160HP and ?200FtLbs?


Most 3.4's run a very high 16 or a low 17

As for mods one second takes alot to make up for.

And if a set of headers has flange problems they belong in the garbage.
well... i have a 3.4 and beat a 92 305.... by a few cars... and got him outta the hole........ 3.4s are awsome outta the hole.... hang with alot of things.... but after 40 they suck........
Old Dec 21, 2002 | 12:35 PM
  #25  
Slowmaro1988's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 37
From: Barboursville, WV, USA
305 TBIs are turds. A 305 TPI is alittle better but a 5.7 is always better. I have seen some supercharged 305s running good times tho.

Im still looking and so far looks like im only going to be able to afford a 3.4 car...
Old Dec 21, 2002 | 12:39 PM
  #26  
94TeALFiReBiRd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 162
From: Collinsville IL
Originally posted by Slowmaro1988
305 TBIs are turds. A 305 TPI is alittle better but a 5.7 is always better. I have seen some supercharged 305s running good times tho.

Im still looking and so far looks like im only going to be able to afford a 3.4 car...
i bought my 94 firebird for 5,700 during of may of 2002........had 66,xxx on it.......
Old Dec 23, 2002 | 12:24 AM
  #27  
99blackSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,719
From: Bay Area, CA
I don't know what the 3.4s have for traction control but the SGS (second gear start) on the 3.8 is a joke, plus it heats up the tranny. I lost way more control in my 3.8 with SGS then my LS1 with ASC or whatever its called. My point is the LT1 might have good traction control. If I was in your situation I would get the LT1 because it sounds like you want a moded 3.8l and why not just get the LT1, if its an option. If not the 3.8 is still a really good car, no matter what you do get t-tops.
Old Dec 23, 2002 | 02:36 PM
  #28  
shortdog273's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 216
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally posted by thadoc
With just a few minor mods I could take a 3.8 though the 1/4 with ease!
HAHAHAHAHA
Old Dec 23, 2002 | 02:43 PM
  #29  
94TeALFiReBiRd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 162
From: Collinsville IL
Originally posted by shortdog273
HAHAHAHAHA
must be pretty fst 3.4 shorty right?
Old Dec 23, 2002 | 02:53 PM
  #30  
shortdog273's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 216
From: St. Louis, MO
3.4 guys, don't take it the wrong way, but thadoc said he beat 3.8s WITH EASE! Mustangeater82's car is pretty quick for a 3.4, but I guarantee you he don't beat 3.8s with ease.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20 AM.