V6 Tech 1967-2002 V6 Engine Related

94 Camaro 3.4L VS 1990 Honda CRX SI

Old Apr 23, 2005 | 10:01 PM
  #16  
92rslt1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 447
From: NY Rochester
Re: 94 Camaro 3.4L VS 1990 Honda CRX SI

AHAHHAHAHAHAHA so funny. They arent that fast and if you have some with 200 hp that smoke 400hp v8 camaro somthing is wrong with your camaro. I actualy am into ricers too. I have had a **** load of cars and a 92 civic with a vtec b18c1 gsr is one of them.It has 200 hp and will not smoke any v8 camaros. I know my 4cyl stuff too and i know why i like them both.4cyl pull hard and rev high almost like a adrenaline rush while my v8 car comes off the line and puts you in the seat like a plane on take off. Theres no feeling like the gs of a good hook and 420hp v8. That i will most likely never find in my gsr civ. I got some pics of it too if you dont believe me. The sunfire gt will take it off the line too and only runs .4 seconds less in a 1/4.Wich i bet if i had the right sized tires the sunfire would be closer if not beat it. BTW the sunfire has 230k miles and up until last week(wp leak) hasnt had a dime of repair done to it.I beat the car bad too.Good little car. Anyway this is way off topic you got me on a rant so thats all i have to say

Last edited by 92rslt1; Apr 23, 2005 at 10:24 PM.
Old Apr 23, 2005 | 10:45 PM
  #17  
bodydropped's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 88
Re: 94 Camaro 3.4L VS 1990 Honda CRX SI

[QUOTE=92rslt1]AHAHHAHAHAHAHA so funny. They arent that fast and if you have some with 200 hp that smoke 400hp v8 camaro somthing is wrong with your camaro.

what i meant was you need a 400 horse camaro to keep up with some of them,there a a few here in atlanta running almost in the 10's now thats impressive. my bird was nice i even had a 100 shot on it also.
the hatch i have now came built,its a LSvtec swap,type r cams,type r intake manifold and throttle body,type r tranny with LSD,13:1 compression,lightend fly wheel and a beast of a clutch.the motor is built internally aswell,balanced,rods strengthed,all ARP rod bolts and studs,rc 270cc injectors,fully programmable ecu with 3 chips 1 for a 150 shot,1 for 93 octane gas,1 for race gas,3inch exaust,race type header,underdrive pulleys,walbro 225 fuel pump,so much i could go on for a while.the suspension is freaking amazing too,all tokico shocks and struts with adjustable coil overs,and to top it off a brembo brakes and a nice set of Hooiser slicks for the front(had to drive home 50 miles on them )..the previous owner ran in the 12's with no nitrous and ran 11.70's with a 2 stage nitrous kit. for real. can a 400 horse camaro run 11.70's???
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 01:03 AM
  #18  
atl2001's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 657
From: carbondale IL \ Alton IL (outside St Louie MO)
Re: 94 Camaro 3.4L VS 1990 Honda CRX SI

Originally Posted by bodydropped
can a 400 horse camaro run 11.70's???
easily
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 01:06 AM
  #19  
Z_boy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 114
From: Mansfield, TX
Re: 94 Camaro 3.4L VS 1990 Honda CRX SI

well no a 400 hp camaro probly couldnt run that but you compared it to a 250 hp ricer which in that case the camaro would stomp it. ur car, running those 11's probly has alot more than 190-250 hp and it has to have a s hit load of money dropped into it before it put up those kinds of numbers. if the same amount of money was put into a v8 it would easily put down those numbers im sure.
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 08:46 AM
  #20  
bodydropped's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 88
Re: 94 Camaro 3.4L VS 1990 Honda CRX SI

yeah, im not sure what the whp is on my hatch,but if you have a 1900lb car and 250whp,you have a wild car.its that power to weight ratio that most people dont get thats why some of you v8 guys have been ran down by hondas and nissans and toyotas(some of you). now the honda guys with thier gay body kits and big wings and GSR this and that,they stand no chance against my hatch or my formula.well some of them.
oh and i have seen new vette's beaten badly by civics,it breaks my heart to say that but its true.they all wanna race this kid in a 96 hatch,i mean his tag even says 10sec.but i guess you cant teach a old dog new tricks they keep coming back for more,and lose each time.come out to atlanta and run at the atlanta dragway in commerce on a friday night better yet call them and ask them what happens to domestics on a friday import grudge match.maybe the import scene is crappy where you are but here its way diffrent,you rarley see body kits and neons anymore mostly guys in thier mid 30's driving these imports primered up complete sleepers,quiet exaust.i call them money makers and they still get 28mpg

Last edited by bodydropped; Apr 24, 2005 at 08:56 AM.
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 10:44 AM
  #21  
92rslt1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 447
From: NY Rochester
Re: 94 Camaro 3.4L VS 1990 Honda CRX SI

Im calling on this one boys. and yes there is 400hp cars in the 11s.Theres no way you run 12s and get 28mpg. not gonna happen. My gsr gets less with less mods. Thinking that your making this up I have to call Unless you can show me your time slip and a couple under the hood shots then i will shut up. You will of course have them since you have a 11 sec honda. Who wouldnt keep it handy. Lets see it.
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 10:44 AM
  #22  
Z28WannaB's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 467
Re: 94 Camaro 3.4L VS 1990 Honda CRX SI

Huh wrong, we don't need 400HP to keep up with them. This is such a generalized statement it makes me want to vomit.

The only way they are going to get 250HP to the wheels is with engine swaps plus a turbo. With an equal amount of money dumped into an F-body the rice burner will get his *** beat down.

- Z28WannaB

Originally Posted by bodydropped
just watch out for the sleeper civic's.some are insane and smoke my formula and camaros like nothing.the funny thing is we need 400hp to keep up with thier 190 to 250hp to the wheels.so i crossed over and traded my formula for a built civic hatch.and my god its so much faster and i havent even added my nitrous yet i traded 1 hour ago.knock the rice burners if you must but i gotta tell you some of these guys are not ricers and know thier stuff. i think everyone on here needs to drive a built import at some point.
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 10:53 AM
  #23  
MarcR94v6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,960
From: San Diego, CA
Re: 94 Camaro 3.4L VS 1990 Honda CRX SI

LOL. Beating a new corvette, huh? How much chicken fried rice did he put in his nitrous tanks?

Last edited by MarcR94v6; Apr 24, 2005 at 10:57 AM.
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 11:16 AM
  #24  
92rslt1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 447
From: NY Rochester
Re: 94 Camaro 3.4L VS 1990 Honda CRX SI

The only way they are going to get 250HP to the wheels is with engine swaps plus a turbo
yea and i didnt see were you said you had a turbo and i have never seen a honda run 11s na. And theres very very few modded hondas out there that can beat a new stock STOCK vette. The fact is it cost more to build a equaly powered hond than to just buy a new vette. I raced a ls1 the other day in my gsr actualy and it was not even funny. he got 2 car lenght by second gear and then he was gone by 3rd.
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 11:39 AM
  #25  
bodydropped's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 88
Re: 94 Camaro 3.4L VS 1990 Honda CRX SI

Originally Posted by 92rslt1
Im calling on this one boys. and yes there is 400hp cars in the 11s.Theres no way you run 12s and get 28mpg. not gonna happen. My gsr gets less with less mods. Thinking that your making this up I have to call Unless you can show me your time slip and a couple under the hood shots then i will shut up. You will of course have them since you have a 11 sec honda. Who wouldnt keep it handy. Lets see it.
hey no problem,how do i post pictures on here?i will gladly show you the hood shots i have now.since i just got the car last night i dont have any time slips,remeber i said 12's no nitrous and 11.70's with a 2 stage nitrous kit.and you need to read a little more my ecu comes with an assorment of chips,pick your pleasure and plug it in,one for race gas,nitrous,normal every day driving.i to thought this guy was messing with me,but i met him saw it drove it,alomost crapped my self and traded. its cool though if you dont belive it,i didnt either but that was me being ignorant,but its mine now!!! yippie!!! its a amazing how every forum i ever go to some one calls bs on something that is possible,oh yes i even saw a VW beetle run an 11.72 and the night of fire at commerce he ran a SVT cobra and beat him to death.but seriously how can i post a picture on here?let me know if you want to see what im talking about

Last edited by bodydropped; Apr 24, 2005 at 11:41 AM.
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 11:48 AM
  #26  
bodydropped's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 88
Re: 94 Camaro 3.4L VS 1990 Honda CRX SI

Originally Posted by 92rslt1
yea and i didnt see were you said you had a turbo and i have never seen a honda run 11s na. And theres very very few modded hondas out there that can beat a new stock STOCK vette. The fact is it cost more to build a equaly powered hond than to just buy a new vette. I raced a ls1 the other day in my gsr actualy and it was not even funny. he got 2 car lenght by second gear and then he was gone by 3rd.

11's with nitrous,thats not N/A 12's with out.and yes there is a crx running in the 10's all motor hes sponsored by castrol.take a look at a import drag site.this is hard though, owning a f body with a big nasty shot of nitrous and owning honda that will murder it. dont know what to say really,it just amazes me how tunable these cars are becoming.and with a import its so hard to get theses numbers,with my formula its way to easy,bolt on this bolt on that cam headers blah blah,it get boring dont you think?when every ones mods are the same?dont get me wrong im a gm man for sure.just respect some of those hard core import guys they love racing just as much as you and me. and GSR those are not really quick enough to beat a LS1,or LT1,but i bet you could do it.try it,hhok it up.im sure you will love it. and no i dont make things up,why would I?nothing to gain by doing that.....oh and i cannot run a turbo with 13:1 compression.

Last edited by bodydropped; Apr 24, 2005 at 11:52 AM.
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 11:53 AM
  #27  
92rslt1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 447
From: NY Rochester
Re: 94 Camaro 3.4L VS 1990 Honda CRX SI

Link it to webshots.com SO your saying you yourself have never riden that car down a 1/4 in 12 or less. That pretty much means its hear say and means nothing unless you have slips.Ive yet to see a na civ run 12 or 11.When i bought my civ the kid claimed it ran 13s I went to the track and the best run of the night was a 14.9 all conditions met for a good run. So 13s was just hear say.
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 12:00 PM
  #28  
92rslt1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 447
From: NY Rochester
Re: 94 Camaro 3.4L VS 1990 Honda CRX SI

hes sponsored by castrol.
Thats a multi million dollar company with a huge reputation to hold of course its a freak car. and your right about 13.1 comp im actualy not even sure you can run off pump gas like that. were as if your paying 3$ or more a gallon and im paying 2.20 whos actualy saving more money on gas??
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 12:02 PM
  #29  
bodydropped's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 88
Re: 94 Camaro 3.4L VS 1990 Honda CRX SI

Originally Posted by 92rslt1
Link it to webshots.com SO your saying you yourself have never riden that car down a 1/4 in 12 or less. That pretty much means its hear say and means nothing unless you have slips.Ive yet to see a na civ run 12 or 11.When i bought my civ the kid claimed it ran 13s I went to the track and the best run of the night was a 14.9 all conditions met for a good run. So 13s was just hear say.
thanks i will get some up in a few,but im not kidding there a 11,12,and 13 sec hondas around some are all motor some are boosted and some run a ton of nitrous. if you were from atlanta this would be much eaiser to explain,but the previous owner of the car has a very good reputation,and is a very intellgent tech,and good driver aswell.he ran for money on the street mostly and the reason he got rid of this car is beacuse he could not get anymore races and he wanted to show people doqn here how to build a f body to run like hell. around here my cars time slips are not hear say,they are common knowledge. the cool part is no one know i have it now,and im changing the color and im not driving around forever on slicks like he was.this guy was a serious import race engine builder.but whatever i will get the pics he sent to me before we met and traded.if that dont work for you i guess i will have to get you a slip then huh?
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 12:08 PM
  #30  
bodydropped's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 88
Re: 94 Camaro 3.4L VS 1990 Honda CRX SI

Originally Posted by 92rslt1
Thats a multi million dollar company with a huge reputation to hold of course its a freak car. and your right about 13.1 comp im actualy not even sure you can run off pump gas like that. were as if your paying 3$ or more a gallon and im paying 2.20 whos actualy saving more money on gas??
yes i can run pump gas only 93 octane with a computer detune(the chip) when i want to run hard i switch chips and run race gas.and im not really comparing savings,domestics will always be the cheapest way to go for big power,but kinda ruins the element of suprise dosent it?i bet i will make more money at the track with my honda than my formula.simply because its unexpected. and yes my engine to is a freak also.and i pray i dont break anything the parts are not really avaliable in the us.so i guess that kinda sucks for me.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 PM.