Track Kill Stories Race Track Victories, 1/4 Mile Times, Dyno Numbers - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

Late 90's Dakota 5.9 R/T's.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 15, 2004 | 08:15 PM
  #1  
Black6SpdTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,043
From: Mooresville, NC
Late 90's Dakota 5.9 R/T's.....

What do these trucks run? I know they were made in the late 90's and possibly 2000+, but from what my buddy at work told me...

260HP
340 lb ft.

What do they typically run?
Old Jul 15, 2004 | 08:29 PM
  #2  
GreenDemon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,770
From: Mishawaka, IN
Depending on the year, it should be between a 15 and a 16, high 80s, low 90s. Good competition for a V6 Camaro, not much for a Z28 to worry about.

I'm sure some people will say otherwise, but it usually takes more power to get a truck moving, so 260 hp really doesn't mean much, especially when Dodge's new hemi truck is stuck in the 15s too. From a Z28 point of view, the only two trucks to worry about are Lightnings and SRT-10s. Other than that, most trucks will need nitrous or boost to keep up.

[/lecture]
Old Jul 15, 2004 | 08:30 PM
  #3  
Steve Y's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Slow. Those things are overrated pigs. High 15s stock.
Old Jul 15, 2004 | 08:37 PM
  #4  
Black6SpdTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,043
From: Mooresville, NC
Sweet! He told me when it was stock he ran 9.X in the 1/8th. BS?

NOTE: He's done intake/exhaust/tuning since.
Old Jul 15, 2004 | 08:57 PM
  #5  
Steve Y's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Originally posted by Black6SpdTA
Sweet! He told me when it was stock he ran 9.X in the 1/8th. BS?

NOTE: He's done intake/exhaust/tuning since.
Yeah, maybe he ran 9.99 in the 1/8 stock. Maybe. Run him and show him his place in the food chain, below you. What is up with your times? Those seem mighty slow for your mods. Bad track day?
Old Jul 15, 2004 | 09:33 PM
  #6  
stereomandan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,620
From: Saginaw, Michigan
I ran a couple at the track last year. 15.9 -16.2 is what they ran

Dan
Old Jul 16, 2004 | 12:37 PM
  #7  
Beanboy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 233
Those 5.9s can get some power real quick if the right mods are done to them...
Old Jul 16, 2004 | 01:39 PM
  #8  
Bristol's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 317
From: Richmond
Agreed. With the "right mods" these trucks really wake up. Ive got a 2000 RT and they are dogs. No real performance mods done yet except dual Borla exhaust but tons of appearance stuff. I let the Z do the runs and the truck for cruising.
Old Jul 16, 2004 | 03:42 PM
  #9  
Mtdewandal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 25
From: Ga.
Cool

Ahhhh, who cares what he has done to that R/T, Just line em up.
Old Jul 16, 2004 | 04:33 PM
  #10  
Antz97ZNJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,223
From: Browns Mills, New Jersey
The sound great but there not fast, think I heard w/ a good amount of mods in the 14's
Old Jul 16, 2004 | 11:31 PM
  #11  
Black6SpdTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,043
From: Mooresville, NC
Originally posted by robvas
9.5 @ 75...maybe he has a V6

An LT1 should run a 9.0 @ 79mph or so
Hold up. My sig does not say 9.5 @ 75MPH....

I had 3 runs that night, it was when the car was BONE stock and my tires/clutch were crap. The best time I could muster between the 3 runs was 9.5 @ 72. I missed 3rd gear. The 75MPH run was a 2.3 60' and 9.6XX run.

Don't be hatin'

NOTE: Going back in 2-3 weeks with mods (CAI/Headers/Y-Pipe by then) and I'll get some real times.
Old Jul 17, 2004 | 12:16 AM
  #12  
Steve Y's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Originally posted by Black6SpdTA
Hold up. My sig does not say 9.5 @ 75MPH....

I had 3 runs that night, it was when the car was BONE stock and my tires/clutch were crap. The best time I could muster between the 3 runs was 9.5 @ 72. I missed 3rd gear. The 75MPH run was a 2.3 60' and 9.6XX run.

Don't be hatin'

NOTE: Going back in 2-3 weeks with mods (CAI/Headers/Y-Pipe by then) and I'll get some real times.
We're not hatin'. We just wondered why your times were so slow. Was your clutch slipping? If not you should be trapping at least 79 mph, stock.
Old Jul 17, 2004 | 11:24 AM
  #13  
Black6SpdTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,043
From: Mooresville, NC
Originally posted by Steve Y
We're not hatin'. We just wondered why your times were so slow. Was your clutch slipping? If not you should be trapping at least 79 mph, stock.
Clutch was slipping a little bit. I know I need plugs/wires. The guy before did them 2 years ago when he replaced the opti. I took the car right off the street, onto the track. No weight reduction, no air pressures, etc. I know I should still be trapping more. We'll see in a few weeks.
Old Jul 20, 2004 | 11:15 AM
  #14  
2K1SunsetSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 649
From: Clinton TWP, MI
Re: Late 90's Dakota 5.9 R/T's.....

My old 97 Dakota with a 318(club cab/short box) ran 15.88 @ 85. I believe Dodge rated the 318 @ 220hp that year but I'm not positive.
Old Jul 20, 2004 | 03:57 PM
  #15  
SFB767's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,486
From: FL
Re: Late 90's Dakota 5.9 R/T's.....

Originally Posted by 2K1SunsetSS
My old 97 Dakota with a 318(club cab/short box) ran 15.88 @ 85. I believe Dodge rated the 318 @ 220hp that year but I'm not positive.
That's right. The 318 got 230 HP in '98, I know because my dad's Ram has one. Just for the record, I think the most HP the 5.9 R/T had was 250. They're nice trucks though.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 PM.