Track Kill Stories Race Track Victories, 1/4 Mile Times, Dyno Numbers - DRIVE RESPONSIBLY

do bone stock 88 mustang gt's run 13.9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 17, 2003 | 02:51 PM
  #76  
sukkoi19's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10
From: Moline IL
Originally posted by Rearpl8tsinsite
do bone stock 88 mustang gt's run 13.9


We seem to be a bit off topic. Key word GT's.

Mustang GT's are a bit different than the cars you are talking about (fox body, notch back, hatch back). I believe they are 200-300 lbs heavier than the cars talked about in this thread.

So the answer to the question is NO Stock 88 mustang GT's do not run 13's. Hatch, fox, notch are possible with a great driver. Do the math. (hp/weight) I have seen a 89 GT geared, posi, and huge tires on the back run 14.0 with a good driver at the wheel at California Speedway. Once that engine and 2 others gave in that same car needed free mods, exhaust, filter, and gt40 intake to hit 13.9's. Of coarse now that same car is close to 12.5's with heads, cam and other goodies.
Well the problem here is, in the title it says stock, then he goes on to say that it has exhaust work. So we really dont know whats done to it. With very minimal mods speed-density cars can hit the 13s, which is what this car seems to be. As far as bone stock, no I dont think they can touch the 13s.
Old Dec 17, 2003 | 06:27 PM
  #77  
amean94ta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,991
From: pa
Originally posted by amean94ta
NO, BUT I AM CALLING BILL COSBY A LIAR THEM JELLO PUDDING POPS TASTE LIKE ***
nobody found this funny?
Old Dec 18, 2003 | 11:09 AM
  #78  
Steve Y's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Originally posted by amean94ta
nobody found this funny?
Why is it funny? Bob Cosby knows what he is talking about unlike a lot of retards on this board.
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 08:14 AM
  #79  
BlackHatch's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1
From: VA
Originally posted by Steve Y
Why is it funny? Bob Cosby knows what he is talking about unlike a lot of retards on this board.
Yeah, keep challenging Bob when it comes to factual knowledge about the Mustang. Kinda stupid to try that guys. Bob knows his sh*t.
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 12:15 PM
  #80  
Juiced347Stng's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
From: NC
I have personally seen a friend of mine run his "bone stock"( all the way to stock exhaust and silencer) 91 GT, run as good as 14.1. I know this is not a usual case, but he was a hell of a driver and was at the dragstrip everyweek.

I also have seen a mustangGT run as good as 13.5 with just the addition of ET streets and 4.10's.

Jeremy
Old Dec 20, 2003 | 02:27 AM
  #81  
Johnnynsac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 589
From: Sacramento CA
I normally don't get into this kind of thread but as much as I love the Fox body 5.0 GT mustang, I have to say I have never in my life seen a bone stock from the factory mustang run in the 13's. 14, yes, all the time. I'm not saying that it never happens but as many as I've seen run, I should have at least seen one by now run in the 13's. Still a fast car for it's time.
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 08:40 AM
  #82  
hasi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9
From: Erie , PA
Originally posted by Steve Y
You don't know your *** from a hole in the ground.
better than you
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 11:42 AM
  #83  
Steve Y's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Originally posted by hasi
better than you
Right . Go away troll boy.
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 09:04 PM
  #84  
PoloGreen 3.4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 263
From: Vegas
Im sure this was already stated, but I dont want to read through 6 pages..what is the normal times for fox bodies in the 1/4 mile?
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 09:12 PM
  #85  
hasi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9
From: Erie , PA
Originally posted by Steve Y
Right . Go away troll boy.
Punk
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 07:54 PM
  #86  
Mike 92LX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 221
From: Merritt Island FL USA
Its a tough car to get the ET with. Most are too old to get the numbers with anymore.
I have seen numerous 87-88 cars run low 14s at 97MPH in the last 14 years(308 geared sticks). The 89-92 seem to be slower due to more weight,different cam(87s were different) and MAS added. I saw Tony's black car run -I saw it go mid 13s with BS mods in Jersey as a kid. I saw Steve Collison go mid 13s with bs mods on radials. Saw Evan Smith go 13.89 at 98MPH in his car with "free" mods so low 14s in good air should not be hard to duplicate.
All of them went at least 14.0s stock.
Ed H from Canada went 13.9s stock years ago in his coupe. More I probably forgot about.

Long time readers from this board might remember back in 1998 at Cecil with 1fastFirechicken,Blackhatch,97T/A,Pee Wee from Tealnet,Wildthing94Z etc there was a kid in a 93 LX hatch with temp tags on it at Cecil County dragway. He was running 15.0s at 95 MPH. We instructed him on how to launch,overinflated his front tires and told to him to shift 5400 and to powershift. BINGO. Went 14.3 at 97MPH. Cecil is a fast track and air was good that night. But car was at stock timing,silencer in,unknown oil and NO MODS.

Blackhatch and I met another kid back in 97. Had a 88 hatchback-308s 5 speed. Kid was going mid 15s at 75/80. I did one pass-14.78 at 98MPH-it had no silencer,plug wires,burnt trac loc and a drop in filter. Blackhatch went up to Fredrick and outran about 8 5.0s all with way more mods than he. The kids could not believe it.

I can't count the number of times I have seen or helped kids knock a 1 full second of their ETs just by showing them how to launch and shift.

Basing how fast a car is by races you had on the street is laughable.

LX's are typically at best 50 pounds lighter than a GT. GTs are not as heavy as you think.

I have some mags including popular hot rodding that got a 14.2 at 97MPH with an 87 GT stock. So yes in ideal conditions 13.9 is possible. Almost impossible to duplicate these days. Fastest 5.0 foxes by far are the 93 Cobras and 87/88 GT/LXs
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 10:30 PM
  #87  
MauriSSio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 378
From: San Jose
5400 is pretty high to be spinning a stock cammed 5.0, I actually gained 3 mph from changing my shiftpoints from 5250-5400 to 4900 and I had all the little (cheaper) bolt-ons (went from 97-98 to 100-101).
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 08:01 AM
  #88  
Mike 92LX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 221
From: Merritt Island FL USA
4900 is way to low with a stock cam/intake/head 5.0 especially when using the stock tach which most of the time.
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 11:33 AM
  #89  
Steve Y's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 97
From: Reno, NV
Originally posted by Mike 92LX
Its a tough car to get the ET with. Most are too old to get the numbers with anymore.
I have seen numerous 87-88 cars run low 14s at 97MPH in the last 14 years(308 geared sticks). The 89-92 seem to be slower due to more weight,different cam(87s were different) and MAS added. I saw Tony's black car run -I saw it go mid 13s with BS mods in Jersey as a kid. I saw Steve Collison go mid 13s with bs mods on radials. Saw Evan Smith go 13.89 at 98MPH in his car with "free" mods so low 14s in good air should not be hard to duplicate.
All of them went at least 14.0s stock.
Ed H from Canada went 13.9s stock years ago in his coupe. More I probably forgot about.

Long time readers from this board might remember back in 1998 at Cecil with 1fastFirechicken,Blackhatch,97T/A,Pee Wee from Tealnet,Wildthing94Z etc there was a kid in a 93 LX hatch with temp tags on it at Cecil County dragway. He was running 15.0s at 95 MPH. We instructed him on how to launch,overinflated his front tires and told to him to shift 5400 and to powershift. BINGO. Went 14.3 at 97MPH. Cecil is a fast track and air was good that night. But car was at stock timing,silencer in,unknown oil and NO MODS.

Blackhatch and I met another kid back in 97. Had a 88 hatchback-308s 5 speed. Kid was going mid 15s at 75/80. I did one pass-14.78 at 98MPH-it had no silencer,plug wires,burnt trac loc and a drop in filter. Blackhatch went up to Fredrick and outran about 8 5.0s all with way more mods than he. The kids could not believe it.

I can't count the number of times I have seen or helped kids knock a 1 full second of their ETs just by showing them how to launch and shift.

Basing how fast a car is by races you had on the street is laughable.

LX's are typically at best 50 pounds lighter than a GT. GTs are not as heavy as you think.

I have some mags including popular hot rodding that got a 14.2 at 97MPH with an 87 GT stock. So yes in ideal conditions 13.9 is possible. Almost impossible to duplicate these days. Fastest 5.0 foxes by far are the 93 Cobras and 87/88 GT/LXs
Man what am I doing wrong? Running 14.0 at 101 in a nearly stock '00 GT. I should see mid 13s with these mods if those 5.0s are running that well nearly stock.
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 02:02 PM
  #90  
Mike 92LX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 221
From: Merritt Island FL USA
Improve on the 60ft. 101MPH means 13.6s. I have seen numerous 99 and GT sticks hit 13.8s-7s on the east coast. Fastest I ever saw was David T from LS1.com hit 13.6 in one at Capitol at 102MPH. With temp tags on it.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 PM.