whats faster in the 1/4 mile?A 2002 camaro ss or a 2003 mach 1 mustang.

 

The ss, but anything can happen at the track.

 

last time I went to the track there was a stock mach 1 there running 14.0-14.3

It was 90* and 80* humidity.

 

The 02 SS would be faster. Especially on the street.

 

The LS1 will normally trap more but there almost identical in the 1/4 mile

 

Assuming it was an actual Mach I, it should be close, but once again, ya never know. They run pretty good from the factory. And I believe they're lighter than the fbody as well.

 

The SS has a slight advantage, on the order of 2-3 carlengths in the 1/4 mile everything else being equal.

 

m6 ls1 is faster.



until i see some conclusive proof im not sold on mach 1s hitting 12s STOCK.



if you have any please show me.

 

Exactly. Fastest stock Mach 1 by Evan Smith was a 13.1x at 105ish. He ran a 12.89 at 108ish in a bone stock LS1. It took Paul Svinicki DRs to get a very high 12 out of an otherwise stock Mach 1.

 

careful steve.you might cause an uproar.

 

That's pretty dang impressive for either car.

I agree that the LS1 has the slight advantage, although 108 mph trap vs 105 trap is a little more than a slight advantage.

Dan

 

Yes from high speeds the power and aerodynamics of the Camaro really shine. The Mach's gearing helps it in the lower speeds.

 

Oh well, I can't help it if people can't handle the truth.

 

In the 1/4 they seem to be about even. LS1s and mach1s can both run low 13s. Its a drivers race. Why dont you ask this question on mach-1.org so you can get the other sides opinions. I bet every other post will be


mach1


mach1


mach1

 

Except the answers he got here are correct.