camaro z28 beats lambo diablo!!!
Re: camaro z28 beats lambo diablo!!!
Originally Posted by keithystealmaro
The diablo ran a mid 13.6 while the camaro ran a 13.4 

Re: camaro z28 beats lambo diablo!!!
The older Diablos run low 13s, the newer ones are low 12s.
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
click and scroll down, a lot.
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
click and scroll down, a lot.
Re: camaro z28 beats lambo diablo!!!
Most of the exotics run lack-luster 1/4 times (compared to their hp ratings) due to the high/narrow powerbands (from the "small" displacements and high rpm to make those 500hp ratings) and tall gearing.
With that said... run him on top end and see what happens
Good kill
With that said... run him on top end and see what happens
Good kill
Re: camaro z28 beats lambo diablo!!!
those supercars run much faster than some of us on this board (including myself) tend to think. You can find any internet site that will claim 13 second times for a lamborghini. You will also find them claiming 11.6 seconds.
The thing that seems consistent is their 120mph+ trap speeds. If you put slicks and gears/rear end on a lambo, im sure the 1/4 will drop by up to a full second.
The thing that seems consistent is their 120mph+ trap speeds. If you put slicks and gears/rear end on a lambo, im sure the 1/4 will drop by up to a full second.
Re: camaro z28 beats lambo diablo!!!
Originally Posted by med_reject
You can find any internet site that will claim 13 second times for a lamborghini. You will also find them claiming 11.6 seconds.
Re: camaro z28 beats lambo diablo!!!
I've got a vid on my computer of a lambo murcialgo (sp?) loosing to either a t/a or a camaro. The lambo ran a low 13 in the 1/4 . They are top end cars, and I imagine most of their owners do not drive them to the max to achieve great times in the 1/4.
Re: camaro z28 beats lambo diablo!!!
most of their owners simply do not know how to drag race. C & D gets good times out these cars. These cars beat the z06 in the 0-60, in under 4 seconds, so if they are not just "top end cars", but relatively speaking they perform at their best on the highway.
Re: camaro z28 beats lambo diablo!!!
Originally Posted by med_reject
those supercars run much faster than some of us on this board (including myself) tend to think. You can find any internet site that will claim 13 second times for a lamborghini. You will also find them claiming 11.6 seconds.
The thing that seems consistent is their 120mph+ trap speeds. If you put slicks and gears/rear end on a lambo, im sure the 1/4 will drop by up to a full second.
The thing that seems consistent is their 120mph+ trap speeds. If you put slicks and gears/rear end on a lambo, im sure the 1/4 will drop by up to a full second.
Traction can't be that much of a problem... At least not when you're comparing that to an f-body with lots of low end and skinny tires.
Re: camaro z28 beats lambo diablo!!!
All the newer Lambo's (Diablo, Mucielago, Gallardo) run 120+ traps in the quarter. E.T.s, as we all know, is largely influenced by the driver. A *well driven* Lambo should be able to get well into the 11s bone stock.
In this case, you beat the driver of a Lambo, and for that you deserve congratulations.
In this case, you beat the driver of a Lambo, and for that you deserve congratulations.
Re: camaro z28 beats lambo diablo!!!
Originally Posted by nuke61
All the newer Lambo's (Diablo, Mucielago, Gallardo) run 120+ traps in the quarter. E.T.s, as we all know, is largely influenced by the driver. A *well driven* Lambo should be able to get well into the 11s bone stock.
In this case, you beat the driver of a Lambo, and for that you deserve congratulations.
In this case, you beat the driver of a Lambo, and for that you deserve congratulations.


