2004 SRT4 Neon
Originally posted by NiteRider
Yup, headers and a good cat back and your laughing.
Yup, headers and a good cat back and your laughing.
Now, the exhaust I had before was arguably worse than stock - it was set up very crappily, didnt have a brand name or anything. It was just a replacement muffler and tips, the stock i-pipe was still attached. It was too quiet and I always got walked by similar LT1's in the top end (similar in terms of mods..) Dyno proves magnaflow gives 14hp and 18tq over stock, so I think i probably gained 18hp and 22tq, since that other exhaust didn't flow well at all. Either way, i *definitely* feel a difference now. I'm chirping second *and* third.
Originally posted by whoa guy
no matter how fast a neon is................. its still a pos neon.
no matter how fast a neon is................. its still a pos neon.
i'd take my $5K Trans am that runs over a brand new $20K car that runs just as fast as i do anyday... plus we both know which way the girls are guna look at 
even 2 fast 2 furious proved that.... that guy revved his engien, and he spooled and all, adn u see the v8 rev, and everyone's jaw dropped

even 2 fast 2 furious proved that.... that guy revved his engien, and he spooled and all, adn u see the v8 rev, and everyone's jaw dropped
Originally posted by Steve Y
First of all it is UGLY
! It is fwd. It is little and has a stupid looking wing on the back. It reminds everybody of an economy car. It has no sex appeal (most sports cars look good, are shapely, etc.). It is fast for the $$, I will give it that.
First of all it is UGLY
! It is fwd. It is little and has a stupid looking wing on the back. It reminds everybody of an economy car. It has no sex appeal (most sports cars look good, are shapely, etc.). It is fast for the $$, I will give it that.
The point of the SRT-4 is to demolish all the import sport-compacts and cost less, and it's accomplished that.
Originally posted by andol469
Most of your statements are subjective. I think 94-98 Mustangs look terrible and have no sex appeal.
The point of the SRT-4 is to demolish all the import sport-compacts and cost less, and it's accomplished that.
Most of your statements are subjective. I think 94-98 Mustangs look terrible and have no sex appeal.
The point of the SRT-4 is to demolish all the import sport-compacts and cost less, and it's accomplished that.
Sorry for being off topic. Like you said though, everyone has their own opinion of which cars look nice. Myself, I don't care for the looks of the Firebirds and Trans Am's, believe it or not. I know, blasphemy.
Dan
Originally posted by stereomandan
That's funny, the 94-97 mustangs are the ones that I like the looks of best in the last couple of decades, even though they aren't the fastest. I really don't like the hard corners on the new mustang.
Sorry for being off topic. Like you said though, everyone has their own opinion of which cars look nice. Myself, I don't care for the looks of the Firebirds and Trans Am's, believe it or not. I know, blasphemy.
Dan
That's funny, the 94-97 mustangs are the ones that I like the looks of best in the last couple of decades, even though they aren't the fastest. I really don't like the hard corners on the new mustang.
Sorry for being off topic. Like you said though, everyone has their own opinion of which cars look nice. Myself, I don't care for the looks of the Firebirds and Trans Am's, believe it or not. I know, blasphemy.
Dan

Oh and Steve, I know you were just answering my question, but I see too many people driving stock Honda Civics or even bolt-on Hondas and think they can talk **** about what a POS the SRT-4 is. Just doesn't make sense to me, if you understand what I'm saying. Personally, I don't care for the looks of the SRT-4. I do think just about all model years of Mustang look better than the SRT-4, except for 94-98. I also hate that the SRT-4 is FWD, but that's part of what keeps it's cost so low, so I'm not complaining.
I will say it again
The dodge 2.4L turbo motor should have been dropped into a Avenger type body style with 2 doors and either been an MR or FR
The next big wave of ricers are going to want drift machines and hopefully Nissan will bring the Silvia over...if that happens Dodge will be back to square one....the srt-4 is ugly....even their owners know this....
The dodge 2.4L turbo motor should have been dropped into a Avenger type body style with 2 doors and either been an MR or FR
The next big wave of ricers are going to want drift machines and hopefully Nissan will bring the Silvia over...if that happens Dodge will be back to square one....the srt-4 is ugly....even their owners know this....
Originally posted by andol469
I actually like the look of 4th F-bodies. Go figure.
Oh and Steve, I know you were just answering my question, but I see too many people driving stock Honda Civics or even bolt-on Hondas and think they can talk **** about what a POS the SRT-4 is. Just doesn't make sense to me, if you understand what I'm saying. Personally, I don't care for the looks of the SRT-4. I do think just about all model years of Mustang look better than the SRT-4, except for 94-98. I also hate that the SRT-4 is FWD, but that's part of what keeps it's cost so low, so I'm not complaining.
I actually like the look of 4th F-bodies. Go figure.

Oh and Steve, I know you were just answering my question, but I see too many people driving stock Honda Civics or even bolt-on Hondas and think they can talk **** about what a POS the SRT-4 is. Just doesn't make sense to me, if you understand what I'm saying. Personally, I don't care for the looks of the SRT-4. I do think just about all model years of Mustang look better than the SRT-4, except for 94-98. I also hate that the SRT-4 is FWD, but that's part of what keeps it's cost so low, so I'm not complaining.
About the SRT-4. To each his own. At least it's stock, and not riced out using aftermarket parts like you see all too often. So what if it's on a cheap chassis/vehicle. If the driver likes it, more power to them. I will tell you this, after being an engineer in the auto industry, and dealing with Chrysler/Dodge, you won't ever catch me buying one of their vehicles.
Dan
Originally posted by SergioEK9B18C5turbo
I will say it again
The dodge 2.4L turbo motor should have been dropped into a Avenger type body style with 2 doors and either been an MR or FR
The next big wave of ricers are going to want drift machines and hopefully Nissan will bring the Silvia over...if that happens Dodge will be back to square one....the srt-4 is ugly....even their owners know this....
I will say it again
The dodge 2.4L turbo motor should have been dropped into a Avenger type body style with 2 doors and either been an MR or FR
The next big wave of ricers are going to want drift machines and hopefully Nissan will bring the Silvia over...if that happens Dodge will be back to square one....the srt-4 is ugly....even their owners know this....
That would have ruled, the SRT-4 motor in the Avenger body.........i loved that car.


