Like I said, good kill... But damn, 14.6? lol That is embarrassing to all Mustangs, hell to all cars period! I trap 10mph faster stock. lol

I can't wait to see what my new 95 will do against my Mustang... I get excited just thinking about it.

 

i know it seems slow but most cars run pretty slow here in the desert w/our DA.compared to other states.

(2006 Mustang GT M5) | 13.97 @ 100.64 [2.07 60'] | 4.6 3vNA
(2002 Mustang GT M5) 13.399 @ 102.13 [1.836 60'] 4.6 2vNA
(2007 Charger SRT8 A5) | 13.777 @ 101.61 [2.110 60'] | 6.1 NA
(2006 Pontiac GTO M6) 13.43 @ 107.65 [2.18 60'] 6.0 LS2NA
(2003 Mustang Cobra A4) | 9.65 @ 140.15 [1.35 60'] | 4.6 4vFI - Whipple 2.3
(2004 Pontiac GTO A4) | 11.156 @ 121.45 [1.73 60'] | 6.7 LS1 - Procharger

these are some of the ETs out here.
the o2 stang has a cam in it

 

Allow me to start by informing most of you whom I am, First off this entire conversation is pertaining to my car.Allow me to start off by saying I’m an F-body fanatic I’ve always loved f-bodies He** I own one, I also own a Turbo Civic. Check it out, I’ve been to the track many times, I’ve made somewhere around 200 passes, In one he** of an assortment of cars, The majority of the cars that run at this track, are generally between high 14s and low 17s, it works like this, if its Mopar or any affiliated piece of crap, it will run high 16.00s to low 17.00s, unless its some stupid srt8 model, but who wants to pay those prices, for instance look at the charger what better way for Mopar to pay there respects to the Charger, than to bring it back as a four door sedan model, the taxi cab companies use those cars here, Also every Mopar has some stupid huge rims on it, and a big stereo system, if it’s a Mustang and its pre 2005 and stock it’s more than likely a slow bucket, unless it’s a 60s car then its a good looking slow bucket, There’s always been a lot of hype about fox bodies well general rule of thumb is fox bodies are crap, I mean look at the convertible what was ford thinking when they put a luggage rack on the trunk lid of a ugly sports car to begin with,. And the 3rd generation Fbodys wow where they put together with JBweld, Generally 2005 mustangs and newer will run 14.20s to 14.80s, I ran a guy a few months back with a 2005 GT Mustang Manual and he ran a 15.00 I then ran his buddy that ran a 14.70, with an auto, so I guess there’s just something wrong with Las Vegas Nevada’s batch of mustangs or cars in that matter since these are extremely common quarter mile numbers, so there’s nothing wrong with the numbers of my car prior to supercharging it or even after superchargering for that matter, Now Camaros and Firebirds generally run high 13s for ls1 cars and High 13s low 14.s. for lt1 cars.

Thanks for the discussion.

 

Thread was closed, but after talking with 1998PurpleZ28 I am reopening it for a calm discussion.
Please do not let this get out of hand.

 

thank you for reopening my thread....


to others that posted,do you have time slips for your runs. not dyno numbers since we do not race dynos nor recieve time slips from dynos?

 

Yes, I do.

Here are 3 slips:


At New York International Race Park:


My mods are as follows: SLP LM1 exhaust, Pypes ORX with leak at manifold, plenum, 4.30 gears, sct xcal2 for gears/CEL and drag radials.

Now the 05+ stangs are right between LS1 and lt1 territory. A 99-04 GT runs similar times to the lt1 so I would not venture to say that the 2v guys are slow(especially when Trick Flow just produced a monster for a head). On the street any one of the 4 mentioned cars could win with the biggest handicap going to the auto 99+GT vs. LS1(anything).

I know a good portion of the guys here have quite a bit of seat time, hell I have over 120 passes in this car alone.


EDIT: Hmmmm..... No matter what I do they just do not appear sharp with the sites auto sizing. It is a 13.21, 13.30 and 13.38.

 

i have ridden in a few NBS GTs and they just dont have the pull. another club member had an 06 GT 5spd,x-pipe,flowmasters,cai and a tune on DRs and he ran the crap out of that car pass after pass and the best he got from it was r (2006 Mustang GT M5) | 13.97 @ 100.64 [2.07 60'] | 4.6 3vNA really consistant but no faster.
great ets your mustang has LOL there are some cammed stangs around here, that barely run what you are runnin with your 60' time...........