When to replace shocks ?
02-11-2006, 02:47 PM
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: BC
Posts: 2,325
Re: When to replace shocks ?
I had my stock shocks for a LONG time and they were still good when I replaced them. BUT it was night and day when I did got the new shocks (probably because I got springs at the same time).
Most people will say that the stock decarbons are "so so" and anything is an improvment over them. They don't have to be bad to notice an improvement.
Most people will say that the stock decarbons are "so so" and anything is an improvment over them. They don't have to be bad to notice an improvement.
02-11-2006, 05:15 PM
#5
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 5,556
Re: When to replace shocks ?
I'd only change the shocks if you see oil leaking from them. Otherwise, they should still be good. Our Z28 has 74,000 miles on it and the original 11 year old shocks and they are still perfectly fine, no leaks. If any suspension component is worn out on our Z28, it'd be the rear springs -- they are easy to compress. However, with such weak springs in the rear, the car has a more comfortable ride to it over bumps and dips. I don't drag or anything, so I prefer it being comfortable.
02-13-2006, 04:42 PM
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 715
Re: When to replace shocks ?
The stock shocks are terrible. I changed mine with 100 miles on the car (and I didn't autox it for months afterward, simply because it was so bad on the street). Shocks rarely leak externally, and that is in no way an indication of them being bad. After all, you could have seals and things worn out internally, and if the one at the top isn't bad, it won't leak.
All you have to do it ask anyone who's changed from stock shocks to something else, and you'll see by their improvements how poor the stockers are. Unfortunately, those that have not changed away cannot attest to the difference as it's unknown to them. And most folks have no idea what a lack of damping is or how it manifests itself until it's explained, and often until they experience a car that does not have the issue.
All you have to do it ask anyone who's changed from stock shocks to something else, and you'll see by their improvements how poor the stockers are. Unfortunately, those that have not changed away cannot attest to the difference as it's unknown to them. And most folks have no idea what a lack of damping is or how it manifests itself until it's explained, and often until they experience a car that does not have the issue.
02-13-2006, 04:42 PM
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 715
Re: When to replace shocks ?
The stock shocks are terrible. I changed mine with 100 miles on the car (and I didn't autox it for months afterward, simply because it was so bad on the street). Shocks rarely leak externally, and that is in no way an indication of them being bad. After all, you could have seals and things worn out internally, and if the one at the top isn't bad, it won't leak.
All you have to do it ask anyone who's changed from stock shocks to something else, and you'll see by their improvements how poor the stockers are. Unfortunately, those that have not changed away cannot attest to the difference as it's unknown to them. And most folks have no idea what a lack of damping is or how it manifests itself until it's explained, and often until they experience a car that does not have the issue.
All you have to do it ask anyone who's changed from stock shocks to something else, and you'll see by their improvements how poor the stockers are. Unfortunately, those that have not changed away cannot attest to the difference as it's unknown to them. And most folks have no idea what a lack of damping is or how it manifests itself until it's explained, and often until they experience a car that does not have the issue.
02-13-2006, 05:29 PM
#8
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 5,556
Re: When to replace shocks ?
Well... if he hit a dip and doesn't bounce more than once... the dampening function of his shocks is still working...
Our '02 SS has Bilstein shocks on it, and when we hit a bump on the street, it hits like a mother &%^$%#$. You definitely don't want sporty shocks on a daily driver. But I realize what you're trying to tell him.
I don't know what this guy does with his car, but if he just drives it on the street as a daily driver, and it isn't bouncing up and down when he hits bumps (or the car isn't feeling like it is trying to tear itself apart when he hits a bump -- meaning only one shock is worn out), then he should be absolutely fine with the stock shocks. 37,000 miles on a Camaro? It's barely even broken in yet. New shocks would be a terrible waste of money.
Our '02 SS has Bilstein shocks on it, and when we hit a bump on the street, it hits like a mother &%^$%#$. You definitely don't want sporty shocks on a daily driver. But I realize what you're trying to tell him.
I don't know what this guy does with his car, but if he just drives it on the street as a daily driver, and it isn't bouncing up and down when he hits bumps (or the car isn't feeling like it is trying to tear itself apart when he hits a bump -- meaning only one shock is worn out), then he should be absolutely fine with the stock shocks. 37,000 miles on a Camaro? It's barely even broken in yet. New shocks would be a terrible waste of money.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post